Friday, June 3, 2022

Grand Jury Report Blasts Auditor-Controller, Auditor-Controller Says it's All Incorrect

Posted By on Fri, Jun 3, 2022 at 5:52 PM

click to enlarge Humboldt County Auditor-Controller Karen Paz Dominguez and Assistant Auditor-Controller Jim Hussey at a press conference this afternoon. - THADEUS GREENSON
  • Thadeus Greenson
  • Humboldt County Auditor-Controller Karen Paz Dominguez and Assistant Auditor-Controller Jim Hussey at a press conference this afternoon.

The Humboldt County Civil Grand Jury has interjected itself directly into the county's auditor-controller race.

Less than a week before Election Day, the Humboldt County Civil Grand Jury poured gasoline on what was already considered to be the county’s most contentious political race yesterday, issuing a largely scathing report stating  incumbent Auditor-Controller Karen Paz Dominguez’s office’s failure to file timely state and federal reports has already caused the county to lose more than $2.3 million in “non-recoverable funds,” while placing more than $9.7 million in funding at “significant risk.” The move of releasing such a report mere days before its subject is up for re-election drew immediately questions, prompting the Grand Jury foreperson to issue a follow-up press release today clarifying that the report is the result of months of interviews and “exhaustive research” and was simply released when done and approved, with the Grand Jury’s actions and decision making at no point “informed by politics.”

In response, acting in her official capacity as auditor-controller but with her campaign videographer set up before her on the courthouse steps (his computer plugged into the generator powering the speaker at her lectern), Paz Dominguez held an hour-long press conference this afternoon, answering “any and all” questions, including some about how voters should view this report. She issued a full-throated denial of essentially all aspects of the report that were critical of her office, saying she is aware of no funds lost by the county due to delinquent financial reports, and that if any funds have been lost, there would be subsequent opportunities for seeking reimbursement. As Paz Dominguez spoke, flanked by the county’s assistant auditor-controller, First District Supervisor Rex Bohn, with whom Paz Dominguez has repeatedly butted heads over the years through a series of cross allegations, sat on the courthouse steps looking on.

Immediately after Paz Dominguez finished the press conference, a process server officially served her with the county’s cross complaint civil lawsuit, which the board directed county counsel to file May 10, while also directing the county’s lawyer not to defend Paz Dominguez in a lawsuit brought by the California Attorney General against both her and the county over delinquent fiscal report filings with the state. (The county's cross-complaint reportedly makes the same allegations as the state's, while also accusing Paz Dominguez of misappropriating public funds when she paid a consultant for coaching services.)

There’s a lot to unpack — and Paz Dominguez has provided the press with scores of documents she says refute assertions in the Grand Jury report, which we have yet to sift through — but we’re going to try to give a brief rundown of the basics we know at this point, with both the Grand Jury’s published report and a version annotated by Paz Dominguez, disputing various claims, at the bottom of this post.

The Report

Grand Jury Foreperson Jim Glover described the investigative report as one of the most “exhaustive” in “recent years,” saying it follows “dozens of hours of interviews and inquiries.” Titled “Distrust, Disagreements, Dysfunction,” the report looks at the county’s notoriously troubled fiscal operations, finding that while Paz Dominguez stepped into an office rife with challenges and inadequacies, her office’s poor communication and interdepartmental distrust have marred her tenure, leading directly to missed reporting deadlines and the loss of county, school district and city funds. Exacerbating and enabling these issues, the Grand Jury found, the Humboldt County Board of Supervisors failed to intervene in a timely manner to find solutions and effectively exercise its supervisory duties.

“County departments and the board are at continual loggerheads with the auditor-controller because of ineffective communication and procedural changes,” the report states. “No consensus has been reached to resolve these issues. County services are in jeopardy due to overall financial dysfunction exacerbated by a breakdown of interdepartmental trust and communication on the part of the auditor-controller.”

The report makes clear there are deep rooted issues within Humboldt County’s fiscal systems and points to some significant improvements made, but repeatedly identifies instances in which “deficiencies in the performance of the auditor-controller” have exacerbated those issues, leading to missed reporting deadlines and errors that cost the county and other local government entities hundreds of thousands of dollars.

More specifically, the report states the Grand Jury received “verifiable information” that the county has “permanently lost” funds from a variety of federal and state reimbursements and grants due to its outstanding and now long overdue 2019-2020 fiscal year single audit. Additionally, the report states the county has paid penalties and fees to the IRS for late payroll tax reports and payments, lost interest apportionments and credit card late fees, noting the county employees’ credit card account was at one point suspended when payment was 96 days overdue.

Additionally, local school districts and other entities have been impacted, according to the report. It alleges, due to auditor-controller errors, the Fortuna Union High School District suffered a cash shortage of nearly $200,000, forcing it to obtain supplemental bond funding. Another alleged error by the auditor-controller’s office resulted in the Fortuna district, College of the Redwoods and the Humboldt County Office of Education being collectively underpaid $475,304, while alleged “regular delays” in the Auditor-Controller Office's transferring funds from treasury accounts to school and special districts “have put payrolls at risk.”

Further, the report alleges that delinquent Single Audits, Financial Transaction Reports and Cost Allocation Plans have put $9.7 million in state and federal funds at risk for things like grants for housing residents with disabilities, rural health clinics, workforce development, Mental Health Services Act funding, transportation project funding and future interest related to payroll.

An Alarming and Unusual Disclosure

The report also begins with a potentially alarming disclosure, noting it made an “informal inquiry into allegations of willful misconduct by the auditor-controller” and, late in its investigation as this report was approaching completion, found “sufficient information that would require” it to conduct a formal investigation of those allegations. The Grand Jury will continue that line of inquiry, the report notes, and “can consider its legal options, up to and including an accusation.”

The accusation referenced would fall under California Government Sections 3060 through 3075, which provide that a civil grand jury can file a formal accusation of “willful or corrupt misconduct” against an elected official and seek their removal from office. Such an accusation would be delivered to the district attorney and, if the elected official denies the misconduct alleged, tried in superior court before a jury, “conducted in all respects in the same manner” as a criminal case, with a conviction resulting in the official’s removal from office.

It’s an extraordinarily rare action. And mention of such an inquiry by the Civil Grand Jury — whose investigations and and processes are legally shrouded in secrecy — is in and of itself extraordinary.

Paz Dominguez’s Response

The auditor-controller was unequivocal in disputing the report’s findings, saying she “has seen no evidence” the county has lost any funds and that if anything has been lost, it can likely be reimbursed. Further, she asserted that there is no proof that hundreds of thousands of dollars in late fees and penalties lost are unrecoverable, and definitely no evidence that an additional close to $10 million is at risk.

She classified much of the report's contents as “hearsay,” saying they are the same talking points that have been repeated frequently by some members of the Board of Supervisors and appointed officials who have long pushed back against the Auditor-Controller’s Office asserting its independent authority.

“What I will say is a report is only as good as the information provided to its authors,” Paz Dominguez said, arguing grand jurors seem to have only interviewed the same people who have been vocal in warning of lost funds and laying the blame for blown deadlines at her office’s feet.

Asked during the press conference why so many have pointed blame at her office — the questioner pointing to no-confidence votes from the Board of Supervisors and the Fortuna Union High School District, a critical letter signed by 13 of the county’s 19 department heads, the state lawsuit and now the Grand Jury — Paz Dominguez said the answers are different for each. Some, she said, probably think they are doing the right thing but have been lied to, explaining, “I hate to say it, but if you repeat a lie 14 times, some people are going to believe it.” Others, she said, are motivated by vendetta.

She charged that her office is making constant improvements. It is functioning better than ever before, leading to improved morale and performance, saying that payroll, “torn and tattered” when it was returned to her office, is now running smooth. The failure to timely closely books for previous fiscal years, she said, is partly the product of not wanting to harm special districts, schools and county departments, saying arbitrarily closing the books before receiving all appropriate documentation could impact their funding.

She said the biggest challenge facing her office is staffing level and other departments and outside entities failing to get it timely documentation needed to perform its various functions. Among the few findings in the Grand Jury report Paz Dominguez indicated she agreed with were ones stating the Board of Supervisors should have done more to intervene and reconcile differences between hers and other departments, and that the county administrative officer should make sure all other departments timely file the documentation she needs to meet financial reporting deadlines.

“That’s perhaps the most important one,” Paz Dominquez said of the CAO.

Paz Dominguez also said she was only interviewed once by the Grand Jury at the investigation's start in August, then had a follow-up meeting May 26 after the report was complete.

A Rocky Rollout

It seems clear something was amiss in the Grand Jury’s rollout of this report. According to numerous sources, including Paz Dominguez, the Grand Jury had informed some county officials earlier this week that the report would be distributed to local media at noon today and provided them an advance copy for review, prompting Paz Dominguez to send out an invitation Wednesday night to a press conference scheduled for 2 p.m. at the Humboldt County Courthouse called “in anticipation of a pending headline event.”

But the report was then posted to the Humboldt County Civil Grand Jury’s website sometime early Thursday. Asked about the report Thursday afternoon, Paz Dominguez said she was directed not to discuss it until the grand jury’s anticipated release time of noon today, though she said she was “aware the [County Administrative Office] published it early.”

Asked how she knew it was the CAO that published the report “early,” Paz Dominguez said she knew because the “grand jury just told” her, saying she was told the “webmaster posted the report early” before noting the county’s IT department falls within the CAO’s office.

The Journal then inquired with the CAO’s office, which said it was unaware of any instructions regarding the posting of the report. The Journal then obtained the Grand Jury’s email request to IT. Sent from Glover to the county webmaster email at 6:46 a.m. Thursday, the request, in its entirety, reads as follows: “Good Morning! Please post the attached report to the Grand Jury Reports listing on our webpage. The title of this report is: Distrust, Disagreements, Dysfunction. Thank you, Jim Glover, Foreperson.”

No further direction — or embargoed release date and time — seems to have been provided.

It's also worth noting that the 2017-2018 Civil Grand Jury announced a new policy governing its release of reports in June election years under which no reports would be released from the second Monday of February until after Election Day. Contacted about the policy, Glover told the Journal that was "of great to concern to us many months ago" but the county has a different presiding judge now and is producing reports whenever they are cleared for release without restriction. (It was Judge Joyce Heinrichs then, and Judge Greg Elvine Kreis has since taken over the role.)

"That might change in the future with yet a different judge," Glover wrote, "but those are the guidelines we are operating under presently."

The Grand Jury’s Methodology

According to its website, the 2021-2022 Humboldt County Civil Grand Jury comprises 18 members (see the full list at the bottom of this post). According to prior Journal coverage, when the Grand Jury convenes each year, it splits into a half-dozen or so committees in varying subject areas, and then sifts through complaints and requirements to determine what inquiries and investigations will be undertaken.

The report notes the underlying investigation in this case was launched after the Grand Jury received “complaints of financial inefficiencies, ineffective communication and a lack of cooperation with various governmental entities on the part of the Auditor-Controller and the Auditor-Controller’s Office. (The Journal first reported the existence of the investigation in November, after Fortuna Union High School District Superintendent Glen Senestraro told his Board of Trustees the Grand Jury was looking into allegations of “deficiencies” and “poor service” after the board voted in September to send in an official complaint.)

According to the report, the Grand Jury’s investigation included interviews with “complainants,” elected county officials, county department heads and county fiscal managers. Additionally, the Grand Jury states it reviewed documents provided by witnesses, including emails and financial reports, pertinent state and federal statutes, prior financial reports and correspondences from the state Controller’s Office, Attorney General’s Office and Department of Finances. Additionally, the report states the Grand Jury reviewed Board of Supervisors meetings and “conducted internet research related to generally accepted accounting principles.”

According to past Journal reporting, a Grand Jury committee’s report undergoes three layers of review before it is released. First, the Humboldt County counsel looks it over to assess liability concerns — not for the county as a whole but for the jury itself. Then, the Humboldt County Superior Court’s presiding judge is supposed to give it another review through the same lens or delegate the task to another judge. With the legal feedback in hand, the report then comes back to the full Grand Jury for review and a vote on whether to publish it, with 12 votes needed to move forward with releasing a report publicly.

In his email to the media announcing release of the report, Glover noted that “due to the complexity of this report,” the report took longer to complete than most.

“It is the practice of any Grand Jury for reports to be released as soon as they are completed and authorized by the court, thus today’s release,” he concluded.

Conclusion

The Humboldt County Civil Grand Jury has taken the unusual step of releasing a relatively scathing report days prior to the election, including in it an ominous and even more unusual mention of an ongoing investigation. Paz Dominguez, the subject of said investigation, meanwhile, has basically maintained this is the result of the echo chamber created by her detractors, who are generally just pushing back on the Auditor-Controller’s Office for at long last doing its job. We’ll continue to dig through the documentation Paz Dominguez has provided, and pledges to continue to provide.

In the meantime, find the Grand Jury’s full report here, Paz Dominguez’s annotated version here and a folder containing the referenced documents the auditor-controller has released here.

Members of the 2021-2022 Humboldt County Civil Grand Jury:

Eugene Biggins
Stephanie Boers
Wendy Butler
Katherine Eagan
Kelly Eckberg
Kevin (Tuck) Engelman
Jim Glover
Michele Fell
Frederick Hebert
Victoria Joyce
Robert Kapus
Lyn Klay
Jim Knerl
Shannon Koczera
Linda Kuiper
Gabrielle Long
Jay Molofsky
Bob Phibbs

Editor's note: This story has been updated from a previous version.
  • Pin It
  • Favorite
  • Email

Tags: , , , , , ,

Comments (5)

Showing 1-5 of 5

Add a comment

 
Subscribe to this thread:
Showing 1-5 of 5

Add a comment

Readers also liked…

About The Author

Thadeus Greenson

Bio:
Thadeus Greenson is the news editor of the North Coast Journal.

more from the author

Latest in News Blog

socialize

Facebook | Twitter

© 2022 North Coast Journal

Website powered by Foundation