Jason Warren

UPDATE:
After just a couple hours of deliberations, a Humboldt County jury convicted Jason Warren of all counts.

The jury foreperson wept as the court clerk read off the verdicts in the case: guilty of the deliberate, premeditated murder of Dorothy Ulrich; guilty of the deliberate, premeditated murder of Suzanne Seemann; guilty of the attempted murder of Jessica Hunt; and guilty of the attempted murder of Terri Vroman-Little. Additionally, the jury found Warren guilty of special allegations that he laid in wait and tortured Ulrich, and that he committed multiple murders. Warren faces life in prison without the possibility of parole.

Family members of the victims wept and hugged at the conclusion of the hearing, which resolves the case more than three years after the murders.

Warren, clad in slacks and a dress shirt, with his black hair slicked back and braided in a pony tail, shook his head slightly as the first verdict was read but otherwise showed no emotion. Perhaps underscoring the caseโ€™s impact on the local community, the courtroom was packed to near capacity, with a number of notables attending, including District Attorney Maggie Fleming, Chief District Attorney Investigator Wayne Cox, Undersheriff Billy Honsal and Sheriff Mike Downey, who even held the door for jurors as they were brought into the courtroom.

Warren is due back in court Dec. 9 for a court trial on an unrelated matter. His sentencing date has not yet been set.

PREVIOUSLY:
Accused double murderer Jason Warrenโ€™s fate now rests with a Humboldt County jury.

The jury of seven men and five women began deliberations shortly before 11 a.m. today, after hearing for the first time the defenseโ€™s view of the case. Warrenโ€™s attorney Glenn Brown, who opted not to give an opening argument in the case, addressed the jury directly this morning for the first time in the four-week-long trial.

Brown opened his closing argument in the case by conceding that special prosecutor Paul Sequeira โ€” who was brought up from the Mendocino County District Attorneyโ€™s Office solely to convict Warren in this case โ€” had, โ€œwith great skill and professionalism,โ€ presented a lot of testimony and evidence in the case. Brown then proceeded to try to sprinkle doubt throughout.

Yesterday, jurors listened as Sequeira walked them through the prosecutionโ€™s theory of the case: That Warren tortured and murdered Dorothy Ulrich with a samurai sword in her Hoopa home at about 4:20 a.m. on Sept. 27, 2012 before taking a silver Kia sedan from her driveway, driving to the coast and running down three women out for an early-morning run on Old Arcata Road, killing Suzanne Seemann and seriously injuring Terri Vroman-Little and Jessica Hunt. Warren then ditched the Kia in a Eureka parking lot and hid out at a friendโ€™s house nearby, according to prosecutors.

Three times jurors in the case heard an audio recording of Ulrichโ€™s death โ€” three minutes of percussive whacks mixed with Ulrichโ€™s screams and pleadings for the perpetrator to stop โ€” taken from a video surveillance system in her home. Early in his closing argument , Sequeira said heโ€™d thought long and hard about whether to play the recording again.

โ€œQuite frankly, as I looked at all your faces, I didnโ€™t think you wanted to hear it again,โ€ he told the jury. โ€œIโ€™m not going to play it again because itโ€™s so disturbing.โ€

But Sequeira did methodically walk jurors through the recording โ€” Peopleโ€™s Exhibit 152 โ€” noting that investigators counted between 59 and 65 audible impacts. At one point, Sequeira held up a samurai sword similar to the one allegedly wielded by Warren that morning and whacked it against the podium, causing jurors and audience members to jump in their seats. โ€œItโ€™s disturbing in a courtroom and it makes us jump,โ€ he said, โ€œbut can you imagine being there and living it?โ€

At one point, Sequeira referred to the courtโ€™s legal definition of torture. โ€œThereโ€™s another definition of torture and itโ€™s Peopleโ€™s Exhibit 152,โ€ he said. โ€œIf you want to know what torture is, listen to Peopleโ€™s Exhibit 152.โ€

Sequeira then showed jurors pictures from Ulrichโ€™s autopsy, pointing out that the vast majority of wounds were to the back of her body. Her hands and forearms were extensively bruised, probably because sheโ€™d been trying to protect her head during the attack, he said. Some of Ulrichโ€™s wounds were shallow, which was probably intentional, he said, to inflict maximum pain and prolong her suffering.

Sequeira talked about how Warren had laid in wait and, after spending 18 hours with Ulrich, helping her pack up her house and install one of the aforementioned surveillance cameras, had chosen to attack her when she least expected it. He pointed out to jurors that the vast majority of the blood splattering found in Ulrichโ€™s home was low to the ground, indicating the bulk of the gruesome attack occurred when she was lying down, most likely on her stomach. โ€œThe only thing she could do was cover her head and try to ward off the blows in the hopes it would stop,โ€ Sequeira said. He pointed to Ulrichโ€™s cries on the video, when she appears to call Warren by name, asking โ€œJasonโ€ to stop and asking him why heโ€™s โ€œdoing this. … With some of her last words,” Sequeira said “โ€ฆ she told you who killed her.โ€

โ€œThe defendant had the ability to stop,โ€ Sequeira continued. โ€œWhat did he say? He said, โ€˜Shut up and be quiet.โ€™โ€

The prosecutor also pointed to surveillance footage that appears to show Warren leaving Ulrichโ€™s home shortly after the attack, holding her purse and a long, thin item. He pointed to stains of Ulrichโ€™s blood found on Warrenโ€™s clothing after his arrest that seem to link him to her killing.

Sequeira then turned his attention to the alleged murder of Seemann and attempted murders of Hunt and Vroman Little, explaining that the evidence shows that Warren took the Kia from Ulrichโ€™s driveway and drove it out to the coast. There, Sequeira said, Warren came across Seemann, Hunt and Vroman Little and intentionally ran them down from behind.

The three women were running northbound on the shoulder of the southbound lane, so they could see traffic as it approached them. They were all wearing headlamps and reflective clothing, Sequeira said. The impact of the collision was so strong, Sequeira said, that it sent the three womanโ€™s bodies scattering, noting that one of Seemannโ€™s shoes was found by a hay bail in a field adjacent to the road. The prosecutor pointed out that investigators didnโ€™t find a single skid mark at the scene, and thereโ€™s no indication that Kia braked or turned sharply either prior to or after impact with the runners.

Sequeira said thereโ€™s no question the Kia is the car that hit the three women, noting that debris at the scene and blood and hair samples taken from the exterior of the car all show conclusively that it was the vehicle that ran down the three women. And, Sequeira said, thereโ€™s scientific evidence pointing to Warren as the person who was driving it at the time, noting that glass fragments from the Kiaโ€™s windshield were found throughout Warrenโ€™s clothing and that Ulrichโ€™s blood was found both on Warrenโ€™s left shoe and on the Kiaโ€™s driverโ€™s side floor mat.

Evidence in the case, Sequeira said, shows conclusively and beyond a reasonable doubt that Warren willfully and deliberately tortured and murdered Ulrich, and that he then willfully and deliberately murdered Seemann while simultaneously attempting to murder Hunt and Vroman-Little.

Brown began his closing argument this morning by thanking the jury and noting the horrific nature of the case. โ€œThis case is a tragic case in every sense that you can think of,โ€ he said. โ€œAnything that includes the loss of human life is tragic. Human life is precious.โ€

The seasoned and respected defense attorneyโ€™s closing was devoid of any bombastic courtroom theatrics or impassioned declarations of his clientโ€™s innocence. Rather, Brown calmly and methodically worked to subtly cast doubt on Sequeira’s conclusions of the evidence in the case.

He noted that Ulrich and Warren met by happenstance at a local gas station the day before the murder, when she apparently asked him to come back to her house to help her with some things. He said it was curious that โ€” while packing up her house, getting ready to leave and join her husband on a long road trip โ€” Ulrich asked Warren to install another security camera on the outside of her house.

Brown also pointed out that there were blind spots in the cameras, noting that the back door to Ulrichโ€™s home wasnโ€™t captured by any of the housesโ€™s four cameras. Brown told the jury to keep in mind video members had seen of the property in the hour or so leading up to Ulrichโ€™s killing and that a neighborโ€™s dog can be seen barking and standing alert. He said he was pointing these things out to โ€œrebut the idea that no one else could haveโ€ entered the home in the period prior to Ulrichโ€™s death.

While blood stains that matched Ulrichย were found on Warrenโ€™s clothes, Brown asked jurors to consider that the stains looked distinctly different then the blood spatter found throughout her home. This seems to indicate, Brown said, that Warren was in the house after Ulrichโ€™s death but may not have been present for the slaying. Further, Brown said, one of the blood stains on Warrenโ€™s clothes was found to be a mix of two blood types โ€” one was Ulrichโ€™s but the other was not Warrenโ€™s. โ€œWhose was it?โ€ Brown asked.

Brown also took a minute to zero in on the stateโ€™s special allegation that Warren tortured Ulrich, noting that, by law, torture can only be considered if it was motivated by โ€œrevenge, extortion, persuasion or some sadistic reason.โ€ Itโ€™s clear the first three donโ€™t apply in this case, Brown said, adding that thereโ€™s also no evidence that whoever was inflicting Ulrichโ€™s pain was deriving pleasure from it.

After the killing, Brown said itโ€™s clear Warren leaves the residence and gets in the Kia. Whatโ€™s unclear, the defense attorney said, is if someone else is with him and if Warrenโ€™s driving the sedan when it leaves Ulrichโ€™s property. The evidence is clear that Warren knew Ulrichโ€™s property had multiple surveillance cameras on it, so why, the defense attorney wondered aloud, would his client โ€” if heโ€™d been in the midst of a willful premeditated murder and was taking pains to dispose of the sword used in the killing, as prosecutors allege โ€” not try to destroy the surveillance footage as well?

When it comes to Seemannโ€™s death, Brown conceded the evidence seems to indicate Warren was in the Kia when the runners were hit. But, he said, thereโ€™s nothing to prove Warren was driving at the time, or, if he was, that he intended to run down the women.

Brown said a test of the Kia found one of its tires to be significantly under-inflated, which the defense attorney said caused the vehicle to pull left in field tests at 20 mph. At a higher rate of speed, this could have posed a problem, Brown said, especially for a โ€œcrummyโ€ driver who hadnโ€™t slept the night before.

Brown wrapped his closing argument by reiterating his gratitude to the jury in the case, and expressing his faith in the jury system. He asked jurors to be objective. โ€œThatโ€™s really all I can ask you and I have all the confidence in the world that if you reach a verdict, your verdict will be a just one.โ€

In a brief rebuttal to Brownโ€™s closing argument, Sequeira asked the jury not to speculate about mystery killers that might have been but to look at the evidence before it and use common sense.

He briefly pointed out that fibers from Warrenโ€™s jacket were found on the driverโ€™s side of the Kia and that evidence indicates Warren actually passed by the runners as he traveled south on Old Arcata Road and then turned around in order to run them down in a โ€œmurderous rampage state of mind.โ€ The whole case is โ€œcompletely senseless,โ€ Brown said.

โ€œIโ€™ve told you from the beginning, I canโ€™t make sense of it,โ€ he said, adding that Warren has had a good attorney, an attentive judge and a full trial designed to protect his rights. Now, Sequeira said, it was time for the jury to do its part. โ€œJustice for Dorothy Ulrich, Suzanne Seemann, Jessica Hunt and Terry Vroman-Little is now in your hands.โ€

With that, after a few more instructions, the jury began deliberating.

For detailed, daily coverage of the case, check out Ryan Burns’ reporting for the Lost Coast Outpost here.

Thadeus Greenson is the news editor of the North Coast Journal.

Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *