George Schmidbauer graduated from Willits High School in 1947 and worked his way through college like many other young men at the time, by pulling green chain — grabbing and stacking freshly milled lumber as it came off the line. After college he was drafted, served two years in the Army and was discharged in 1955. Then he headed straight back into the timber business — or “bidness,” as he says it — founding his own company, Schmidbauer Lumber Inc., in 1972.
At 81 he still has the broad chest and strong hands of a mill worker, though his eyes, which nest in the shadow of his furrowed brow, betray a certain weariness. This air of fatigue could have a lot to do with the fact that he was forced to shut down his Eureka sawmill a couple weeks back, placing 60 of his company’s 140 employees on unemployment. (The planing mill and machine shop are still operating, and a stockpile of milled lumber keeps the shipping department active.)
The sawmill closure was necessary due to a lack of supply, Schmidbauer explained last week while sitting in a wood-paneled conference room on the second floor of the mill’s office building. On the wall opposite him was a pair of windows overlooking the dark, mechanized innards of the shuttered mill. Weather’s a factor in the log shortage, Schmidbauer said, as is the still-sluggish housing market. But there are logs to be had. In fact, many timberland owners have refrained from harvesting in recent years in the hopes that market prices would rebound.
Many of those landowners are now ready to sell their logs, but not to Schmidbauer. He simply can’t pay them the price that’s being offered by international exporters, who in recent years have been buying up more and more lumber and logs from across the Pacific Northwest and beyond, then shipping it overseas — primarily to China.
The explosion in forest products exports, which began a few years ago in British Columbia and has now spread into Washington and Oregon, has provided a welcome income stream to timberland owners battered by the 2008 housing market collapse and the subsequent recession. This bullish demand from the Far East shows no signs of flagging. Last year, the value of North American softwood logs and lumber exported to China exceeded $1.6 billion according to Wood Resource Quarterly, an industry magazine. That’s up from just $125 million five years ago.
All of which has been welcome news for many West Coast lumber towns, particularly Canadian ones. British Columbia’s Minister of Forests, Mines and Lands was recently quoted in another industry publication saying that China’s seemingly insatiable demand for wood products “means more forestry workers are back on the job, more mills are running, and forest-dependent communities are enjoying more economic stability.”
If this sounds like opportunity knocking for Humboldt County, well, the equation here isn’t quite so simple for a number of reasons. For one thing, our port has a less-than-ideal dock configuration and lacks the modern infrastructure found at many other West Coast shipping centers. Secondly, the weather and terrain on the North Coast make logging a seasonal business. And thirdly, Canada has mostly been shipping cut lumber, whereas U.S. suppliers have focused more on whole-log exports.
That’s what’s happening here on the North Coast as local timber companies and entrepreneurs try to tap into this emerging market: They’re bypassing mill operators like Schmidbauer. This is happening despite a rebound in the prices he’s offering for logs. A couple years ago, he said, he could only offer $300 to $325 per thousand board-feet. “Now we’re payin’ $425,” he said. But that’s no match for exporters, who are offering more like $525, he said. So while Schmidbauer could potentially make a profit selling these exporters cut lumber for the same price they’re now paying for raw logs, there’s simply no incentive for timberland owners to cut him in on the deal.
If you were to walk out of George Schmidbauer’s office last week, go down the stairs and through the shipping yard to the entrance gate on Waterfront Drive, you could have looked directly across the street at the Schneider dock yard. There you would have seen thousands of shimmering, wet, telephone-pole-straight fir and spruce logs, stripped of their bark and stacked in massive piles. If you’d wandered through the yard’s main gate you might have encountered a dock worker puttering amidst the stacked-log peaks in a tiny loader, and if you’d asked him who the logs belonged to, he’d have answered The California Redwood Company, which is a Korbel-based subsidiary of Green Diamond Resource Company.
This massive stockpile of felled, denuded trees was loaded Monday morning onto the Bright Life, the first of two huge shipping vessels scheduled to arrive in Humboldt Bay in as many weeks. (There’s another mountainous stockpile of logs on the Samoa peninsula.) Otto Van Emmerik, Green Diamond’s operations manager in Korbel, said via email that the exportation market has already had a positive effect on the value of spruce, white fir, hemlock and Douglas fir logs on the North Coast, to the benefit of his company as well as local timberland owners. “The log values will increase the likelihood of additional harvests and result in more work for local foresters, loggers, timber fallers and log haulers,” Van Emmerik said.
Currently, however, it’s doing nothing to help George Schmidbauer or the 60 workers he laid off. In past seasons, many of the logs that were loaded onto the Bright Life Monday morning would instead have been sold to Schmidbauer, then milled into lumber and re-sold to his own customers. Needless to say, it’s frustrating to see such a wealth of logs mere yards away and know that they’ll be milled not in his own facilities but thousands of miles across the Pacific — sort of like dying of thirst in the middle of an ocean.
“Sure, yeah,” Schmidbauer said. “If you’re gonna export a big percent of the raw material out of Humboldt County, it’s gonna be a big problem for us.” But, displaying the diplomacy of a seasoned businessman, he said that he doesn’t really begrudge Green Diamond or the other interests for capitalizing on the export market. He knows that the forces of supply and demand are as implacable as the tides. He cautioned, however, that the deal might not be as sweet as it appears. Exporters only want the highest-quality logs — no crooked or knotty ones — so sellers shouldn’t assume that the price being offered will apply to their entire stand. Plus, the export companies don’t abide delays, which could arise from any number of complications.
In other words, it’s a risky enterprise all around, as local businessman Bob Figas discovered last year when he brokered the county’s first major export deal to China (“Going Global,” July 29, 2010). According to several sources Figas lost a bundle and is now being sued by the charter company. (Calls to Figas were not returned by press time.) He was nonetheless hailed as a pioneer by local business magnate Rob Arkley at a recent logging conference. The profitability of the deals now being executed may well determine the future course of timber activity in and around Humboldt Bay, which leads to this question: Is this model — shipping raw logs rather than cut timber — good for the local economy? Will the rising tide of exports lift all ships, or are we unnecessarily exporting valuable jobs atop those mountains of logs?
Let’s start the analysis with those 60 laid-off workers at the Schmidbauer mill. Dennis Mullins, a research analyst at the local office of the California Employment Development Department, said not all jobs are equal. Sawmill jobs in particular have a strong “multiplier effect” on the larger workforce: Statewide studies have found that one sawmill job adds another two-and-a-half to three jobs to the surrounding workforce due to the higher-than-average wages and the impact on surrounding industries. “So if you added 100 sawmill jobs you’d add an additional 250 or 300 jobs in other industry sectors,” Mullins explained. “The consequences of shipping the logs out rather than milling them locally is fairly dramatic,” he said.
On the other hand, there has been a sharp increase in timber employment in recent months. Logging and mining jobs have doubled since the same time last year, from 200 to 400 jobs, with roughly 95 percent of that growth attributable to logging, Mullins said. These new jobs were the largest single factor in reducing the county’s unemployment rate by 7/10ths of a percent over the same time last year; our preliminary February mark is 11.6 percent, placing Humboldt 18th among the state’s 58 counties.
Many who work in and around the bay are optimistic that our jobless rate could continue to fall. In a phone call from Washington, D.C., Humboldt Bay Harbor, Recreation and Conservation District CEO David Hull said he believes the arrival of more ships into the bay is good for the community, not to mention the financially strapped district. Hull was in the nation’s capital with fellow members of a statewide port association lobbying Congress to maintain federal funding for dredging the state’s waterways — including Humboldt Bay, where the Army Corps of Engineers is paid to keep the entrance clear of sediment. The high cost of this ongoing project was easier to justify (and finance) when the Evergreen Pulp Mill was bringing in 25 ships per year. Renewed shipping activity will help convince the feds to keep contributing funds toward those dredging costs. Hull believes the value of overseas timber exportation extends even further. Indeed, the multiplier effect isn’t limited to sawmills.
When a ship arrives at the opening to our harbor it’s greeted by a Harbor District-employed bar pilot in a rented tug boat. A second tug, with its own local crew, is usually employed to assist the ship into port. Once the ship arrives at the dock, longshoremen secure the vessel. Later, these workers will help with the loading. While the ship is in port, a stevedore company works to provide whatever the crew needs, be it groceries, water, fuel, sewer service — all supplied by local retailers. Plus, depending on the length of time in port, many crew members will disembark to spend money at local stores.
“The stevedores did a calculation a couple years ago,” Hull said. “Not counting [bar] pilots, having a ship in port has about a $140,000 value to the community.” Another benefit, he said, is that it keeps the local forests active. Yes, he acknowledged, ideally we would be exporting value-added products — processed lumber and manufactured goods rather than raw logs. “But, you know, the market’s just not there right now,” he said.
He expects that to be a temporary situation. As Schmidbauer himself noted, increased American exports will inevitably force domestic prices upward — again, those irresistible forces of supply and demand. Plus, Hull said, you shouldn’t underestimate the ingenuity of mill owners. “These guys are clever, and they’re survivors,” he said. “I think they’ll come up with something creative that will help the economy of our area.”
Just what that something might be remains to be seen. Aside from sitting around, waiting on the outcome of the local experiment with Chinese exports, Schmidbauer said he doesn’t see many moves available to him. “The only thing we’re doing [is] we’re buying a new piece of equipment to cut smaller logs more efficiently.” He wouldn’t say exactly how much this new slabber will cost — “a lot” was as specific as he’d get. “And, uh, I hope it’s not a waste of money,” he added, looking beleaguered.
A commonly accepted economic principle is that expanding exports helps to create jobs and grow the national economy. That may be true on the macro level but as this situation reveals, things aren’t always so simple up close. Last year, President Obama set a national goal of doubling U.S. exports in five years, a much-lauded objective. Large-scale log exports to the Far East may help the country reach that mark. And, as distasteful as it is to benefit from the suffering of others, rebuilding efforts in Japan, following the tragic March 11 Tohoku earthquake and subsequent tsunami, will also increase demand for timber exports.
Humboldt County now has an opportunity to contribute more toward those national exportation stats than it has in the past, but some business interests — Schmidbauer, for one — and elected officials wish that there was more acknowledgment of the nuances involved in the equation. One such official is Harbor District President Mike Wilson. “Personally,” he said, “I would hope that [federal goals] could include expanding our potential for value-added exports so it’s not purely predicated on resource extraction.”
Still, Wilson believes that if log exports out of Humboldt Bay prove successful they could potentially restart the engine of the local timber industry. The ensuing momentum, he said, could lead to new opportunities for adding value to our raw materials, whether it’s cutting dimensional timber or, as mills around the Port of West Sacramento and elsewhere have been doing, producing wood pellets that are being used in China to reduce carbon emissions from coal-fired power plants. Wilson said, who knows what other possibilities might present themselves?
International exportation is rife with complexities, from the intricacies of maritime law and port logistics to the fluctuating world of currency exchange. A robust export market depends on all sorts of personal relationships, business arrangements and government cooperation. Those things have already been established around ports in Oregon, Washington and British Columbia. There are hints that Humboldt Bay may be the next player in this high-stakes game: South Korean export company DK Korea is in the process of establishing an office in Eureka, and in recent months there has been an influx of export company representatives holding meetings around town, according to Schmidbauer.
The challenges of exporting from the Humboldt Bay region are well known. There are choppy seas, a treacherous bar crossing, and narrow bay channels in continuous need of dredging. Then there is the relative isolation of this port compared to those with better access to transportation corridors. But the emerging economies across the Pacific — China in particular — suggest that the future vitality of the local timber industry may depend on figuring out how meet those challenges.
Over the past 60 years, Schmidbauer has seen markets from around the globe experience building booms, but nothing like what’s happening in China today. He’s been there twice now. On his first trip, three years ago, he was shocked at the pace of development. “I couldn’t believe the amount of apartments they were building that weren’t inhabited at all,” he recalled. “We asked ’em the question, ‘What are they for?'” The response? “‘Well, they’re for the future.'”
Patric Esh, a student at College of the Redwoods, contributed to this report.
This article appears in Shipping Jobs to China?.

As long as we’re exporting a national treasure that we can’t seem to use here…I wonder how much I can get for my children overseas, since their nation is divesting in them anyway.
Since the collapse of the timber industry in Humboldt county it seems that we’ve been thrown into a bipolar logic of anti-scientific, emotive, so-called “environmentalism,” and an equally irrational, (not very well) greenwashed timber harvest industry. In this split we’ve lost probably the most valuable thing that Humboldt county ever had, aside from its now 90something% decimated Old Growth–a real, worker-based impetus toward collective ownership and management of our natural resource commons. Today, instead of IWW-style discussions of how best to communalize our land and distribute its bounties equally, many want to kick the logging industry out entirely, while others think that “green” capitalism can create incentives to allow Green Diamond to make a profit and create jobs while also doing little harm to the environment. What gets lost between the primitivism and psuedo-anarchism of our so-called “environmentalists” and the newer, greenwashed face of the same-old-capitalism is a realistic and very POSSIBLE communalization of our shared resources. If all profit from the harvesting of timber were kept in the hands of those who harvest the timber and those who are affected by it’s harvest, it would be much easier to argue for keeping the processing local–or you could simply use the common profit to subsidize local mills until a market for surplus-added products reemerges in the future.
Aside from the natural capital we are exporting to China, I am curious to know how much profit is exported from Humboldt into the hands of the shareholders of Green Diamond, etc., compared to the amount left here in the form of wages.
Phil, the local logging industry wants to be seen as a resource provider while operating like any profit based company. The resource in question is obviously nowhere near as renewable as the logging companies want us to think, nor are they as “green” as they’d like us to believe either. In fact, when people think “green”, they don’t think “deforestation”. Quite the opposite. These companies still log at maximum allowances set by higher regulators, spinning the story so as to have us believe they’re voluntarily slowing their roll, so to speak.
So basically I agree with you sort of for the most part I think. Those companies are just a bunch of human beings like everybody else, they can change their ways as much as everybody’s had to on account of their company’s environmental damage. Our planet’s environment is in critical condition, and the global consensus recognizes a 180 u-turn is needed to save everybody’s future. That’s reality. There is no better time to start than fifty years ago.
So, like any company, loggers are cutting jobs at the bottom while still seeing profits at the top. The logging companies own LOTS of Humboldt County’s open space, and it would be excellent for everybody in the world if that space was allowed indefinite generations to reforest itself. This can happen simply by further restricting the amount of local logging and insisting on exclusively “selective harvesting” or whatever Green Diamond etc. calls it at an extreme maximum….
…just like any company, let the loggers fight out the profit loss among themselves until each company has been whittled down to their current highest-ups going out with chainsaws and “harvesting” one log per acre per day themselves so they can maintain their personal profits. $500 per day is still over $100,000 than most of Humboldt’s population makes in a year. Give them the land outright if that’s what it takes, they obviously don’t recognize the need for REforestation on massive levels right now.
Trees are not commodity anymore than livestock or human beings.
Phil, I’m calling B.S. on your analysis.
Since when did Humboldt county have a “worker-based impetus toward collective ownership and management of our natural resource commons.” ?
Why do you think all Humboldt environmentalists are psuedo-anarchist or primitivist?
Do you believe EF! Humboldt is trying to end all logging in Humboldt? I can tell you we are not. We want restoration forestry to be implemented where appropriate, which is a huge percent of the land.
What do you actually know about the situation?
I think your full of it.
I wish we could pound the Humboldt environmentalists to the ground. However if I run into some scum down at the river I don’t know if he’ll survive.
How are we supposed to use all this lumber locally? Environmentalists fight against development, and then throw a fit when the lumber gets exported. Japan is going to require a massive rebuilding effort, and China may very well sell them that lumber, with trees they bought from the U.S. Would people still protest if we were shipping lumber to Japan? People don’t want the 101 widened, which might help to stimulate the local depressed economy, and then wonder why the timber industry looks elsewhere to sell their goods. Which do you want, a growing local economy or a development-stagnant export economy? It seems to me that you can’t have both. The housing market is still at its bottom, so there’s not even that much demand for new houses; can we support a timber industry on current house repairs or small building projects? Food for thought.
anonymous 9:42, at least you’re being honest about your beliefs, as ass-backwards as they are. If you’re among those who think widening the 101, through an ancient and endangered redwood grove nonetheless, is going to stimulate the economy, your opinions are pretty moot. Double so if you think the current rate of logging is carved in stone. Triple so if you think “developers” are really persuing the general public’s best interests. There’s already plenty of ‘development’ in humboldt. That industry needs to stop feeding the beast.
In fact, some of the very same people responsible for shipping those logs to china are pushing for a Home Depot in Humboldt, where local contractors would buy what? “cheap chinese crap” is what it’s generally known as.
As if logging, real estate and construction are the only industries worth time and money in Humboldt. We want stability, not more of the same. The loggers are bragging that business is profitable “once again”. They don’t care at all that everybody else’s is on the downturn.
It’s my understanding that no old growth will be cut in the proposed widening through Richardson Grove, and will a few more feet really impact the roots more than the already existing road?
I thought part of the argument against widening the 101 was that it would bring in the big box stores and turn Humboldt into the next Santa Rosa or San Francisco. That could only happen if the economy expanded, which would create more jobs and maybe lift Humboldt out of the poverty state that it’s in. Not everybody can be a grower, you know, some people have to, or choose to, work jobs that pay a regular wage, have health benefits, retirement plans, etc.
Not all Chinese products are “crap,” and it seems a bit nationalistic, maybe even racist, to adopt that view. Many of the fancy gadgets that people love so much, and buy hand-over-fist, are manufactured in China and other Asian nations. Is it because China is the #2 economy in the world, threatening to overtake the U.S., that Americans are so against “made in China”?
Has Target, K-mart, and Costco ruined the “Humboldt way of life?” Why aren’t people out protesting in front of those big box stores, if they are so evil?
Maybe some people want Humboldt to remain in poverty, want the jobless rate to stay high, think it’s somehow revolutionary to be poor. Tell that to the 11+% unemployed who need jobs and can’t find them.
We’ll have you all singing “China is Great” the USA will be gone, suckers!
The discussion is not about shipping milled lumber products to tsunami ravaged Japan. It’s about shipping raw logs to China, where it will be used for concrete forms to add to the already excessive un-occupied developments there.
What source do you get that from? The Chinese government is very smart, and intentionally curtails their growth when they need to, to prevent economic bubbles like the ones in the U.S. China is also a growth economy, building out their infrastructure, and I’m sure that they will put the logs to good use, as needed. They may plan to sell lumber to Japan for their rebuilding projects, after milling it themselves. It’s a global economy, welcome to the 21st century. We should be thanking China for creating some kind of market, since the U.S. has a glut of houses, a housing market that is still at its bottom (unless we go for a double dip), a national economy that’s barely recovering, and a local economy that is stagnant, at best. You fight against local development and then whine when raw materials are shipped elsewhere. No wonder Humboldt is such a poverty-stricken county, with locals who fight tooth-and-nail against virtually any kind of economic growth, unless it fits in with their strawbale mentality.
Political Correctness and Extreme Environmentalism IS and WILL BE the DownFall of this once Great Nation!