Journal intern Scottie Lee Meyers submits this report:

Arcata residents Jolian Kangas, Valerie Rose-Campbell and Mark Sailors all attempted to run for city council, but according to the city clerk’s office (and as first reported by Kevin Hoover of The Arcata Eye), none of the three challengers managed to collect 20 signatures from Arcata voters and have thus failed to qualify for inclusion on the November ballot. 

The seats up for grabs are currently held by Mayor Michael Winkler, Vice Mayor Shane Brinton and Councilwoman Susan Ornelas, all of whom will be on the ballot. 

Deputy City Clerk Bridget Dory said potential candidates must provide at least 20 signatures of registered Arcata voters but cannot submit more than 30. Signatures are disqualified if they don’t belong to registered Arcata voters or have non-valid addresses.
The city’s signature requirement is less rigorous than even HSU’s student government threshold. Students there must gather 50 valid signatures to run for council positions with Associated Students. To run for AS president, candidates must submit 150 signatures.

Arcata city council candidates had almost a month to gather signatures and had the option to file them a day early — before the Friday 5 p.m. deadline — to make sure their signatures checked-out. If errors came up, candidates would have had the opportunity to fix them. All three incumbents filed early while none of the challengers did so, according to Dory. 

Of the 27 signatures Kangas supplied, only 11 were valid. Rose-Campbell had 16 of 30 signatures verified. And only 15 of Sailors 26 signatures checked out. The three non-incumbents can still run as write-in candidates but must fulfill the same 20-signature requirement. The paperwork for write-in candidates must be filed between Sept. 10 and Oct. 23. 

Sailors learned of his disqualification this morning by phone. The 41-year-old owner of Kineticab, a bicycle taxi company, couldn’t believe that all three challengers failed to qualify. “This whole thing smells fishy, as fishy as a fish processing plant,” he said. “This is small town politics at play.”  

He said he asked every single signee if he or she was registered to vote in Arcata. “I can see one or two of them might not have been bright enough to understand,” he said, adding that having 11 disqualified didn’t seem right. He’s unsure whether he’ll continue his campaign as a write-in candidate.

Campbell-Rose said she’ll forge ahead in her bid for a council seat. She said she’s pushing for support on her Facebook page and will canvass in the community.

Meanwhile, in Eureka, two council seats are up for grabs. In the 4th ward, Melinda Ciarabellini will run unopposed. When Frank Jager won his mayoral election in 2011, he appointed Ciarabellini to fill his position on the council. In the 2nd Ward, Joe Bonino, a payroll technician at HSU, will challenge incumbent Linda Atkins.

Ryan Burns worked for the Journal from 2008 to 2013, covering a diverse mix of North Coast subjects,...

Join the Conversation

8 Comments

  1. Nothing’s “easy” about small town politics corrupted by money and the disgusted majority of eligible voters who always fail to register, or to vote. Geez, I wonder why???

    Not one print-media covered the story, nor followed-up, on the corruption surrounding Rex Bohn’s campaign. His 2004 campaign was the first in this county to benefit from a phony front-group mailer…this time, he had 6, and not one reporter pushes Mr. Bohn for answers???

    Did he ever report the occupations of his 60 top contributors?

    Who gives a damn, right?

    Call-out the development community’s political dominance and you get burned…one way or another.

  2. There were several stories on the Bohn campaign’s dodgy tactics in the NCJ, as I recall. Not much in the T-S from what I remember, though.

  3. To its credit, the NCJ traced Bohn’s phony 2004 front group “Eureka Coalition For Jobs” back to a Sacramento attorney known to work for Arkley. The mailers and TV spots were estimated to cost $250,000 for a $500/month rural city council seat!

    No one EVER EVER EVER asks why!!!???

    Ryan Burns scratched the surface of the corruption surrounding Bohn’s campaign on the NCJ blog site. Bohn can’t remember the development-related occupations of his 60 top donors? How much did his 6 phony front groups cost? Will Bohn report them on his disclosure forms?

    There was ZIP in the NCJ…or anywhere else…except the blogs!

    Presto…..ancient history!

  4. Why on Earth did the Journal have to give us any false hope in 2004 that there’s still public-interest journalism out there?

    Dang!

  5. I agree with Skippy. Nicely done report. Mark Sailors loses his “fishy” rights by not having taken the offered opportunity to file early to ensure his signatures were valid when there was time to fix the situation. I’m glad the report included that information.

  6. It’s all about who you know. If you don’t actually know the people signing…you need to get 3-times more than required!

    Everywhere other than Arcata, politics is “who you know”, but is one of Hum.co’s top censored stories.

    Get the development community to sign-on…and you win…

Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *