Seems like I’ve been saying this a lot lately, but I’ll say it again: Help me out. Lawyers especially, this time.
Look at the last two items on the list, here. Is District Attorney Paul Gallegos trying to take his Pacific Lumber lawsuit to the California Supreme Court?
Interesting, too, to note that the Appellate Court apparently altered its final ruling in the case at the request of the state Attorney General’s Office. And over Palco’s objections. Didn’t hear any of this mentioned in bankruptcy court the other day.
This article appears in Codes, Damned Codes.
I’m pretty sure that means he’s petitioning the Supreme Court for review. There are motions you can make with the appellate court itself for reconsideration, but there’s no reason to send the record to the Supreme Court although you’re supposed to send copies of the appellate court briefs to the Supreme Court as a matter of course.
Do you mean that he’s petitioning the SC for cert, or that he’s petitioning the Supreme Court to order another appellate court hearing — en banc, or what have you?
I’m still fuzzy on this, I’m afraid.
Under discretionary jurisdiction, you need to file your petition for review to the SC within 10 days of the appellate court decision, home dog.
If you look at the modification filed 2-1-08 (click on opinions on the left, then click on First District in the pull-down menu) it appears that the court deleted a parenthetical cite – nothing of any consequence as far as I could see.
PG is due for a big win. I can feel it in my shell.
PG is in for another humiliating lesson in law.