As California ramps up its purchase of protective gear for health care workers, the state also has set
a back-up plan in motion: cleaning masks so they can be used again and again.
Face masks called N95 respirators are worn by doctors, nurses and other medical workers to filter out infectious droplets carrying the virus. They aren’t supposed to be reused.
But with shortages of personal protective equipment reported across the country, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention acknowledges that hospitals may have to consider reusing these masks “as a crisis capacity strategy.”
Mark Ghilarducci, director of the California Governor’s Office of Emergency Services, said Wednesday that the state, in partnership with the Federal Emergency Management Agency, will be deploying new sterilization systems from Ohio-based defense contractor Battelle within the next week.
“It’s a technology that is designed to get on the ground and actually bring in a used N95 mask and do a sterilization and cleaning process that makes them basically new again,” Ghilarducci said.
But it’s not that simple, according to Amy Herr, a professor of bioengineering at the University of California, Berkeley, and David Rempel, a professor of medicine at the University of California, San Francisco.
They warn about the potential for cross-contamination when sterilized masks are returned to hospitals. And if sterilized masks don’t find their way back to their original owners, they might not fit well enough to seal out infectious droplets.
“I wouldn’t call them clean masks, I would call them maybe cleaner masks,” Herr said. “They’re not as good as new.”
Herr and Rempel are part of a team of experts who have spent weeks digging through scientific literature to create a set of best practices for decontaminating masks, compiled on a website called N95DECON.org.
“Both of us hope that none of this ever has to be done, and that enough new masks come in that no hospital has to decontaminate any masks at all,” Rempel said.
Battelle’s decontamination system received emergency use authorization from the Food and Drug Administration at the end of March. It works by exposing masks to hydrogen peroxide vapor for more than two and a half hours to decontaminate them, and Battelle claims it can clean up to 80,000 masks in a day.
It’s unclear which hospitals are involved, where the decontamination systems will be located in California and how much it will cost. Battelle spokesperson Katy Delaney declined to comment and the California Department of Public Health did not respond.
The plan, according to a letter to hospitals from the state health department, is for hospitals to label respirators with a hospital ID and collect them on-site. As long as the respirators aren’t soiled with blood, bodily fluids, or cosmetics, they can go into a bag, which is placed in another bag, which is placed into a box for pick up or delivery.
Masks can’t hold up to this kind of cleaning indefinitely; they wear out after about 20 uses. But the hope, Newsom said on Wednesday, is that it could help by “stretching existing resources.”
Herr and Rempel answered questions from CalMatters about dirty masks and decontamination.
(The interview has been edited for clarity and brevity.)
Q: What is so special about N95 respirators?
Rempel: These are different from the surgical masks that tie behind your head and that are more leaky. An N95 is designed to have a seal over the surface and around the nose and chin. When you have it in place, and you do what’s called a seal test — where they put their hands over the mask, and they blow out through their mouth or nose, or they suck in — you don’t feel any air escaping around the side. Also, the N95 has, in the middle, a special electrostatically charged membrane that captures small particles coming through and doesn’t let them go through to the person’s lungs.
Herr: If you are just a citizen or a member of the public, you’re being urged not to wear these N95 masks and to take unused masks to health care centers so that the frontline health care workers can use them. There’s a lot of other ways that we can protect ourselves but healthcare workers can’t. They rely on these special respirators, and they really, really need them from us.
Q: Why aren’t N95 respirators typically re-used?
Rempel: Respirators really should not be reused under any circumstances in a hospital setting because they can become contaminated either from patients you see, who might have an infection, or from the healthcare provider themselves, who might unwittingly have an infection.
Typically what you’re supposed to do is change your respirator between every patient, but in an emergency situation like this, that’s just not happening. There aren’t enough respirators to go around. So healthcare workers are using the same respirator all day long. That’s happening much more in New York and New Jersey and Michigan than it is in California, but I expect right now that process is happening in California, too.
Herr: Our healthcare front-line professionals are human. This goes against the grain of what they’ve been trained and understand to do. We know from discussions with them that they are afraid both for their patients, their own families, and really that spurred a lot of us researchers to action in terms of understanding how can we dig into the science that has been done by decades of other researchers to help find the most information, and the most accurate information we can, and get that into the hands of decision makers.
Q: What methods have you found work best for decontaminating masks?
Rempel: We’ve narrowed it down to three different methods that seemed the best. One is UV light. The second one is hydrogen peroxide vapor, which I’ve been focusing on, and the third is moist heat.
Herr: We’ve been looking at UV light, the C-component of UV light, which is used for sterilization, and working to translate those protocols into really digestible approaches that people can adopt. It is used for sterilization because it breaks down the DNA and RNA, the nucleic acids that are inside these viral particles, when exposed long enough. And that’s kind of the catch. Just like any light, there can be shadows that can be created. So if there are viral particles in those shadows, they may not be inactivated.
Q: The Battelle system that California will be deploying uses hydrogen peroxide vapor. How does that system work?
Rempel: There’s very strong evidence that it both decontaminates and kills any microorganisms on the mask. And it can be used over and over again up to 20 cycles without damaging the mask’s filter, or the straps or any other part of a mask. Some of the other systems, like the moist heat, and some other processes can damage the mask itself or the straps over a shorter number of cycles, so it’s obviously dangerous if a health care worker uses one of those masks, they might be using a mask that’s not protective.
Q: What methods don’t work for decontaminating masks?
Rempel: There are other methods that people are thinking about that clearly don’t work and damage the masks — like using alcohol, or maybe storing the mask overnight for a day, or dunking the mask in peroxide, or other chlorine types of solutions. Those damage the masks and should not be used.
Herr: We were thrilled when CDC guidance came out. There are a lot of consumer products that are out there, and there are even some medical products that are out there that do not provide enough UV-C light to be effective for face mask decontamination. There are specific ways that UV-C light must be applied for it to be safer and effective.
Q: Are there any pitfalls you can foresee with this new decontamination effort?
Herr: When we’re thinking about these processes, for making the masks safer — not safe, but safer — for reuse, all of the handling of the mask before and after they get to the treatment is super important.
Trying to get the masks back to the initial user because the masks conform to the shape of your face. That whole handling process is absolutely critical because of that, but also because of wanting to avoid cross contamination during the handling.
Rempel: I would just say that the fit issue is an important one, that making sure that the masks aren’t deformed and they come back to the original user is a key element, and that the masks aren’t decontaminated more than 20 times. That’s the limit; if you go over 20, the mask straps can break.
Q: What would you want to see in terms of shipping and handling to ensure there’s no cross contamination and that the cleaner masks get back to the right people?
Rempel: There’s a way of labeling the mask with a person’s name and the hospital and the site that it comes from, so that’s done properly. They’re placed in a special bag. The shipping process has to be done properly, and then obviously the return process to get the right mask back to the same person in a way that doesn’t allow for contamination because you don’t want people to be sticking their hands in a bag to pull out their masks using dirty gloves, for example.
CalMatters.org is a nonprofit, nonpartisan media venture explaining California policies and politics.
This article appears in Stay out of Sight.


Well written article, very helpful summary of the scattered emerging literature.
There is no seal test for the N95, it is too permiable. A respirator with. P100 filters is seal tested each time it is donned. The high demand for N95s has neglected to call for the reusable respirator with P100 filters. The lack of use of PAPRs by personnel that may not need to communicate is criminal. Too few respiratory protection knowledgeable Industrial Hygienist have been consulted.
These article is great. As I am a fit test trainer for N95 respirators at the hospital I work at, handling and storing the respirators properly for reuse is vital for preventing cross contamination. Good read overall
I worked at Battelle and while wearing the N95, got into some NASTY s#@t. I would not wear used N95 mask, no way Jose.
My #1 question that no one ever asks for some reason: Why don’t hospitals use half face or full face reusable respirators? 3M and Honeywell and others manufacture these. Each hospital staff member can disinfect their own respirator easily, the hospitals can order disposable n95 filters, and there wouldn’t be as much of a strain on the public trying to find disposable n95 respirators.
As retired Industrial Hygienist, I would add my voice to the question about using elastomeric facepiece respirators. They would provide much better protection to the wearer, without question. But I do point out that they do not provide quite the same level of protection to others, as you breath out through an exhalation valve, not through the filter membrane. Now, how important this is I cannot say, I would guess that “droplets” are largely captured in the exhalation valve and covers of many respirators, depending on design, but it is not something I can say with any confidence. Also, it is highly likely that traditional HEPA filters (a semi-archaic term when used with respirators, but still applicable) would be MUCH more easily decontaminated. They have decades of proven resistance to degradation by many chemicals like formaldehyde and H2O2 and can sustain major radioactive exposure without degredation. Traditional HEPAs are not dependent on electrostatic forces the way N95 filters are.
I’ve been using n95 masks for over 20 years they are disposable not reusable .. end of story…
That’s what we have been focused on is providing reusables with P100 filters and filter/cartridge and PAPRs. Everyone is too obsessed with the N95 that’s not out there in the market. Instead of thinking in numbers of masks, we should be thinking about the number of healthcare providers we can protect over certain number of days.
What about simply heating the masks for some period of time? Have read that viruses gets deactivated after some 90 minutes at 60°C.
Here is a CDC reference on the topic, including “moist heat” https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/hcp/ppe-strategy/decontamination-reuse-respirators.html
What about ozone sterilization?
Nobody is talking or writing about using ozone gas to sterilize masks.
I agree that ideal use of elastometric face piece. respirators and PAPRs would be outfitted with a P100 pancake filter on the exhaust port, should be a simple retrofit. For first prototype duct tape would work, a quick tap job to cut an adaptor to fit the exhaust port..
Rick Kelly, I agree that an ideal adaptation for the elastometric face piece and filter or PAPR would be to attach a P100 pancake filter to the exhaust port. Simple work to fabricate, for an early testing prototype duct tape would work.
Scott Sammons: I agree, making the modification, if it were really necessary, would be easy. Of course it would invalidate the respirators government approval, but hey, we are way past that point already. The only question–are these pancake P100 filters capable of tolerating the saturated water vapor in exhaled air–they are not exposed to that in their inlet configuration in elastomeric respirators. Would have to be evaluated, but again, not that hard to do, at least in a semi-quantitative way. And manufacturers may already know the answer.
Can they be safely autoclaved?
Just let the mask sit for 4 days…viruses live 3 days at the most on surfaces.
Talk about educated dummies…oh wait..just letting them sit for 4 days is free. Cant do that, no one will make a fortune
One final reference regarding elastomeric respirators https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/nation/2020/04/03/coronavirus-national-stockpile-disposable-n-95-face-masks-reusable-respirator/5118669002/
thanks for sharing this article.
Best clinics software, hospital OPD software, POS & CRM for clinic & hospital, Queue & Booking App, Facebook and website booking integration.
https://dingg.app/clinics-hospitals/