Last Friday morning, Andrew I. Jones — a McKinleyville-based publicist, Web designer and publisher — logged onto his popular parenting blog, Thingamababy, to add a comment to one of his posts. But he was having some problems. He refreshed and refreshed, but thingamababy.com wasn’t showing his comment. So he tried again, but received the same result. The administrative portion of his site showed that he had posted the comment twice, but the public part of the site remained unchanged. The comment was nowhere to be seen.

Meanwhile, over on the popular Humboldt Herald political blog, some people had been noticing odd Internet behavior since the night before — odd, and arguably somewhat sinister. Like Jones, readers of the Herald noticed that pages on the site weren’t changing very often. New posts and new comments were unavailable to some users. Even more strangely, the comment forms on the site — the place where people can enter their thoughts on the topic of the day — came pre-filled with the names or pseudonyms of other readers, as well as their e-mail addresses. In a forum where anonymity is often at a premium, this appeared to some to be a serious and frightening breach of privacy. And it wasn’t just happening on the Herald. Other local blogs, such as Redway attorney Eric Kirk’s SoHum Parlance and the anonymous Humboldt Mirror, were affected as well.

Readers of the Herald compared notes and quickly came to a conclusion. The users being affected by these glitches in the Internet all had one thing in common: They were all customers of Suddenlink, the cable company/Internet provider that serves a large portion of Humboldt County. They reported that sites all over the Web, including the North Coast Journal‘s, were affected to one degree or another. Problems mounted. Readers were confronted with pop-up boxes asking if they wished to “download” a Web page, rather than merely visit it. Visitors to the Herald were, at times, given a version of the site optimized for mobile phones, despite the fact that they were sitting at their home computer.

Jones reported the matter to Suddenlink Saturday morning, but received no response from the company for a couple of days. In the meanwhile, an impromptu mailing list amongst a few local technical professionals and website publishers sprung up, and this list quickly came up with a provisional theory: The cable company appeared to be caching Web pages — saving them on their own machines, then serving those saved pages to their customers. Every so often, it appeared, the company would refresh the cache with updated versions of the pages. This is not a completely unknown practice, but something was terribly wrong with the way Suddenlink was going about it.

In the case of Wordpress — a popular publishing platform used by all of the blogs mentioned above — it appeared to work like this: One user would post a comment with his or her name and e-mail address. The Wordpress system would send that user back the same page, updated with the new comment and with the submitted name and e-mail addresses entered into the new form. Suddenlink, it seemed, would cache that page, and then serve it to all other customers — name and e-mail included.

Perhaps no one saw the danger quite as quickly as Mitch Trachtenberg, a computer programmer in Trinidad who wrote the software used in the Humboldt Transparency Project, an open system for verifying the results of local elections. On the Humboldt Herald, Trachtenberg’s name and e-mail address were among the first to be handed out to other users of the site who happened to be on Suddenlink. He wasn’t too concerned with the breach of privacy in his own case, but he quickly saw how such a thing might affect others who might wish to keep their identities or contact information secret.

“If I’d cared about anonymity, I would have stopped using my real e-mail address when that started,” Trachtenberg wrote the Journal. “I haven’t been harmed, except by lousy service. I think others may have been harmed severely.”

By Monday, everything seemed to have returned to normal.

Reached Tuesday at his office in St. Louis, Mo., Suddenlink Senior Vice President of Corporate Communications Pete Abel knew that a cache system had recently been installed in Humboldt County, but was unaware of the particular problems reported by users. After speaking with the Journal and other Suddenlink employees, though, he released a statement explaining what appeared to have happened.

According to the release, the cache system was installed in Humboldt County on Thursday, Jan. 27 — the very day that users began experiencing problems — and was intended as an interim solution to relatively low Internet speeds in Humboldt County. The system, it said, was able to cache only unsecure websites — those which, unlike almost all reputable banking or commerce systems — do not encrypt communications. But the company eventually discovered the problems that its customers had been reporting and, having fruitlessly worked with its vendor to find a solution, turned the system off on Monday.

“The good news is that secure Web site pages will not have been cached,” Abel said in a follow-up call to the Journal. “And I have been assured 100 ways from Sunday that never would have happened.”

At the same time, though, a great deal of login information for many noncommercial Web sites is non-encrypted. Though no one has reported even greater breaches of privacy than the ones experienced by Trachtenberg — which also affected other people in the county — it is not impossible that they may, in fact, have taken place.

Jones, for his part, was far from pleased with how Suddenlink technical support handled the issue. It took two days for the company’s technical support staff to get back to his request to opt out of the company’s caching system, and when it did it informed him only that he would have to upgrade to a business account if he wanted that service. “The residential service is for entertainment only,” a company representative wrote.

For Jones, that answer isn’t good enough.

“If a small local radio station intermittently went off air for multiple days, the radio host would be apologizing and explaining the situation,” Jones wrote the Journal. “If a large utility company experienced sporadic power outages, people could hear a recording on a toll-free number to learn the cause and about ongoing repairs. What does an Internet provider do when web access becomes spotty and begins serving customers old copies of web pages? The company gets back to you in a couple days and suggests you pay more if you don’t like its recently degraded services.”

Join the Conversation

15 Comments

  1. Did President O just point out that North Korea has better internet connectivity than Humboldt County?

  2. I didn’t catch the Korea reference, but it’s true that South Korea leads the world in residential Internet speeds. About 30 countries are ahead of the US in various comparisons. It’s interesting to look into those nations and see how this access is transforming their societies.

    http://www.netindex.com/download/allcountries/

  3. Mr. Sims, outstanding report.

    Thank you, and Mr. Jones, Trachtenberg, and others in helping resolve this problem.

    I’m not pleased with how Suddenlink treated you and their service to paying customers such as myself.

  4. Thanks for the detailed explanation Hank.

    I was experiencing troubles on Thursday too. Not being a computer savy fellow, I just gritted my death and hoped things would get better.

    They did, and now I know it wasn’t a minor miracle…

  5. Called Suddenlink (# 877-443-3127) kindly advising to resolve their supposedly ‘high speed’ internet service they claim for Humboldt County customers. I encourage others to do likewise unless degraded service is acceptable for you.

    They said, “Thank you; we’ll send it on to Corporate.”

  6. I get at least two pieces of mail from SuddenLink every week, telling me how GREAT their ‘high speed’ internet is……

  7. We are destined to weakness as long as we have few choices…..Suddenlink, as well as AT&T could really care less about this market and show it by a lack of local representation….
    Is it me or are we long overdue for the redundant fiber-optic line?…..Shoot folks – don’t be fooled…we are still analog-to-digital here!

  8. Adding to Hank Sim’s report, I encountered another type of private information exposed by Suddenlink during the period January 27-30, 2011. I was logging into Suddenlink’s web email. I logged in as usual, but instead of my login name, another person’s login name would appear, together with the full email address and a list of all the messages in the person’s inbox. I got different persons on different tries. I did not attempt to read the messages, so I do not know if this was possible. But clearly, anyone with an email account at Suddenlink should know that their email could have been compromised if they had messages on the server during that time period.

  9. How is this kind of fiasco acceptable to both suddenlink itself, and suddenlink users?

    If personal information of its users was disclosed, suddenlink owes us an enormous apology. Not only for that, but for years of terrible service that is actually somehow worse than the cable internet I was getting on the east coast circa 1999.

    Good job suddenlink…

  10. dump SuddenLink. It’s not the first time they messed things up for their customers. There are very few options after them, but anything is better than those dimwits at sudden link – or suddenly unlinked. Ever since they moved into our community our services have suffered.

  11. As a DISH customer/employee I just can’t see still being with a cable company. I made the switch about four years ago and have never been happier with my pay TV service. I have the most HD in the industry plus as a qualified customer I was able to get the HD Free For Life plan, which saves me even more money.

  12. As “American Idol’s” ratings continue to freefall (Wednesday night, it hit a Snapback Caps), and controversial judge New Era Snapbacks continues to bear most of the public blame, Snapbacks Hats sadly isn’t doing much to help “Idol’s” tarnished tabloid image. On Thursday morning, Her Snapbacks For Sale took to her very unfiltered Twitter page, and she often does, to reignite her feud with co-star Snapback Bulls.
    It wasn’t pretty. Or professional.

    Ymcmb snapback was responding to a tweet posted by gossip blogger Perez Hilton, which read: “Mariah Carey BURNS Nicki Minaj On Idol For Lack Of #1 Songs!” Perez’s tweet linked to an article that mentioned a snarky remark Mariah had made during Wednesday’s “Idol” broadcast (when Obey snapbackhad pointed out Raiders Snapback, presumably comparing her Billboard chart track record to Supreme snapback).
    It was a blatant baiting move on Perez’s part–but unfortunately, Nicki took the bait. And that’s putting it mildly. Cheap Snapback Hats rapid-fired back at Perez, Snapback Caps him: “What u SHOULD be doing (wit your messy a**) is asking why a woman SO successful at her age, is still so INSECURE, and bitter.”
    Ohnoshedidn’t. But oh yes, she did. And there was more. NBA Snapback Hats then Wholesale Snapbacks: “Bwaha! Burn? Shes sad i tied her record for Hot 100 entries in only 3 years of being in the game. Yep, a black female rapper.”
    And then Nicki Cheap Snapbacksher latest epic Twitter rant with: “All dem #1s but JLo phone ringin?–referring to Obey Snapback that “Idol” producers had attempted to bring back former judge Jennifer Lopez as NFL Snapback Hatsemergency mid-season replacement (and in the process, sort of confirming those rumors).
    “I guess having a personality, being a secure woman, and giving genuine critique still trumps that,” MLB Snapback Hats said.
    Snapbacks Hatsj, if you’re reading this–or if you’re reading the tweet that will soon link to this article right here–please stop. Just stop. I’ve tried to defend you. When your haters said you didn’t know what you were talking about, I raved about your candor and NFL Snapbacks When your haters said you were the reason for “Idol’s” ratings decline, I cited NBA Snapbacks. When rumors circulated that you wouldn’t be coming back for “Idol” Season 13, I helpfully recommended you for Ymcmb Snapback . But now you’re making Supreme Snapback and insulting one of the greatest pop divas of all time on Twitter–all within 24 hours. And that’s not cool. There are only five more “Idol” Season 12 episodes left, and they may be your last. Please, don’t let the season end this way–the ugly way in which Cheap Snapback Hats.
    Wholesale Snapback Hats Carey has yet to address New Era Snapback Hatsremarks, on Twitter or otherwise–but she is not blameless in this incident either, and tonight’s “Idol” results show could be a doozy. Watch this space.

Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *