No stranger to controversy, evolutionary biologist Richard Dawkins (The Selfish Gene) invited it in spades during an appearance at Oxford University in February of 2013. Asked for evidence that scientific theory was valid, he responded, “[Science] works! Planes fly. Cars drive. Computers compute. If you base medicine on science, you cure people. If you base the design of planes on science, they fly. If you base the design of rockets on science, they reach the moon. It works … bitches!”
It was of course the throwaway “bitches” that got all the attention and that probably had Randall Monroe, creator of the cult comic strip xkcd, ROFL. Back in the early days of xkcd — No. 54, published in 2006 — Monroe’s strip showed a smooth up-and-down curve with its accompanying algebraic formula, followed by “Science. It works, bitches.” Turns out, Dawkins is one of xkcd‘s many fans. (Monroe, a physicist by training, once worked for NASA.)
So what’s the curve and why the over-the-top paean to science? The short answer is seen in the accompanying graphic, where the red crosses match the green curve. The green curve represents the theoretical “black-body spectrum,” as derived from Max Planck’s 1901 equation, the one shown in the xkcd strip, while the red crosses are data from observations made 90 years later, by NASA’s COBE orbiting satellite, of the cosmic microwave background radiation (CMB) from the very early universe. That is, the scientifically derived theory predicted the much later empirical evidence. Perfectly.
German physicist and Nobel laureate Max Planck didn’t know anything about the CMB when he was working on his theory of black-body radiation. (CMB was only predicted in 1948 and discovered 16 years later.) Without going into too much detail, a theoretical black-body is one in equilibrium with its environment, and Planck showed that its spectrum — the one in the curve — depends only on the body’s temperature. The x-axis of the curve represents the radiation’s frequency (1/wavelength), the y-axis the energy at that frequency.
Turns out that 380,000 years after the Big Bang (neither big nor a bang), the universe — a perfect black body then — had cooled just enough for photons (i.e. light) to “decouple” from what, until then, had been a blindingly opaque plasma cloud. It’s those photons, after traveling for some 13.8 billion years, that constitute the CMB. When they started their long journey, they were really, really energetic — that is, hot. Since then, they’ve “red-shifted” down — that is, they’ve cooled as their wavelength increased due to the expansion of space. Now, their temperature is just a fraction above absolute zero (0 degrees Kelvin), the coldest temperature possible. How much of a fraction? Well, 2.73 degrees Kelvin. And that’s what the COBE satellite was measuring, the energy at various wavelengths of 13.8 billion-year-old photons from the very early universe.
Since the curve derived by Planck depends only on temperature, all you have to do is plug in 2.73 degrees and compare it with COBE’s observations — and see how wonderfully they match. And, if you’re anything like me, be gobsmacked by it all.
Science. It works, um, folks.
Barry Evans (
This article appears in ‘A Work in Progress’.
Without question, science works for ‘some’ things. The things it does NOT work for are the more interesting questions for those not satisfied with spending our years only ‘masticating’ the empirical. If you play with science too long you might go blind Barry.
Robert Jastrow was ALSO once worked for NASA (as if it matters). In fact, according to Wiki, “He was the first chairman of NASAs Lunar Exploration Committee, which established the scientific goals for the exploration of the moon during the Apollo lunar landings. At the same time he was also the Chief of the Theoretical Division at NASA (195861). He became the founding director of NASA’s Goddard Institute for Space Studies in 1961, and served until his retirement from NASA in 1981.”
He said some interesting things regarding science…
“There is a strange ring of feeling and emotion in these reactions [of scientists to evidence that the universe had a sudden beginning]. They come from the heart whereas you would expect the judgments to come from the brain. Why? I think part of the answer is that scientists cannot bear the thought of a natural phenomenon which cannot be explained, even with unlimited time and money. There is a kind of religion in science; it is the religion of a person who believes there is order and harmony in the Universe. Every event can be explained in a rational way as the product of some previous event; every effect must have its cause, there is no First Cause. This religious faith of the scientist is violated by the discovery that the world had a beginning under conditions in which the known laws of physics are not valid, and as a product of forces or circumstances we cannot discover. When that happens, the scientist has lost control. If he really examined the implications, he would be traumatized.”
“Astronomers now find they have painted themselves into a corner because they have proven, by their own methods, that the world began abruptly in an act of creation to which you can trace the seeds of every star, every planet, every living thing in this cosmos and on the earth. And they have found that all this happened as a product of forces they cannot hope to discover. That there are what I or anyone would call supernatural forces at work is now, I think, a scientifically proven fact.”
“For the scientist who has lived by his faith in the power of reason, the story ends like a bad dream. He has scaled the mountain of ignorance; he is about to conquer the highest peak; as he pulls himself over the final rock, he is greeted by a band of theologians who have been sitting there for centuries.”