Yes, Humboldt County loves its outlaw self-image. We all enjoy doing our thing and flaunting it in The Man’s face. We’re the spiritual home of freaks and rebels and dropouts everywhere, and we like it that way. We’ve got hundreds of square miles of wilderness and four or five of the prettiest, most human towns in the state, along with a couple that may yet be redeemed. Partly by design and partly by accident, we’ve largely resisted the tidal wave of vapidity that has swallowed the landscape of almost every other part of the country. Let’s raise our glasses and hope it stays that way for the next hundred years. I’m right there with you.
Still, it’s long past time to do away with the soul-deadening hypocrisy that arises from our big cash cow — marijuana prohibition. It’s time for us to wholeheartedly lend our voices to a rapidly growing national movement demanding that the United States raise the white flag on the very stupidest front of the War on Drugs, a set of colossally idiotic and failed policies bequeathed to us by Ronald Reagan and his predecessors. Remember Peter Tosh? Remember that song, “Legalize It”? That should be Humboldt County’s national anthem. They should play it before every Crabs game, and fans should rise and place hands on hearts.
I don’t expect this to become official policy overnight. Why not? It’s not that Humboldt County’s tattered conservative establishment stands in the way — the Good Ol’ Boys of yesteryear have been out of the picture, politically speaking, for quite some time now. No. The Humboldt County residents who would most fiercely resist legalization today are the dope growers themselves. They’re not making money off of marijuana, after all. They’re making money off prohibition. With every step we take to ending this counterproductive war — as with Prop. 215 — they will make less and less. And yes, it’s true — all of us, we residents of Humboldt County, will make less and less.
Tough. We can live with a little less cash in the bank — we’re rebels, remember? — but we can’t continue to abide the damage that the drug war does to our soul and our spirits. Those who root for it to continue out of self-interest aren’t real Humboldt County people, and they are welcome to haul their asses out of town.
On Monday night, 21-year-old local resident David Fields and a 19-year-old associate from the Bay Area arranged to buy a mass quantity of weed at a McKinleyville intersection. (Fields’ city of residence was unavailable at press time.) When the deal was ready to go down, Fields and his associate allegedly drew guns on the sellers, forced them to lay down in the middle of the road and drove away firing shots into the air, 14 lbs. richer. The Sheriff’s Office got a report and caught up with the assailants on Giuntoli Lane. A chase ensued, during which the assailants fired on sheriff’s deputies and the CHP. Finally, after driving over a spike strip, their car veered off the road and went over an embankment. Somehow, both of them ended up with gunshot wounds to the head, though according to a press release law enforcement personnel never fired their weapons. Fields was dead, the associate survived.
This strange case is just the latest episode in a long series of murder, “disappearance,” arson, accidental fire, diesel spillage, home invasion, etc., etc. that marijuana prohibition has inspired in Humboldt County. This is the fruit of our agricultural industry. This and the cash. There are people in our county who tell you to shut up about legalization, that it will blow their game. This — Fields’ stupid death, triggered by God knows what visions of escape — is what they are arguing for. That and the murder of Reetpaul Rana, the murder of Sean Akselsen, the probable murder of Chris Giauque, the poisoning of Hacker Creek, and on and on.
What we have to understand is that too many of today’s growers have nothing to do with our parent’s age, when growing a cash crop out in the back field was a way of bringing on the Age of Aquarius. For all their goofiness, the original back-to-the-landers had some sense of purpose beyond driving a new car and buying vacation property in Costa Rica. There’s a whole new crop of growers for whom American mass culture is their mother’s milk. They simply do not give a shit. These are the thuggish types who boycott and slander the Arcata Eye for reporting the facts about grow houses in that town, and whine whenever this paper publishes anything that threatens to give away the big secret that people grow weed in Humboldt County. (“Thuggish,” I say — mercifully, their post-slacker lack of balls mostly prevents them being thugs in fact.)
Meanwhile, none other than Gov. Schwarzenegger — like our last three presidents, an ex-toker — is calling for an open debate about legalization. Let’s take him up on it, and do him one better. This is Humboldt County, for fuck’s sake.
This article appears in Meltdown.

Speak it brother!
There it is.
HOWEVER, I think the best times are when a decent ounce of weed cost a hundred bucks, locally. We could return to that again. People with nice land could do "winery tours" of weed. There would be money for Emerald Triangle folks just in the name and fame.
I’d like to see a poorer, but more honest and established pot grower thrive, and legalization would do that. Imagine Humboldt, again sleepy, again safe to wander about, safer neighborhoods, and better, outdoor pot.
Thanks, Hank.
"I don’t expect this to become official policy overnight."
Looks like you got your wish.
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB124225891527617397.html
There are rational arguments on all sides of the question, and I decline to rehash them (sorry). After 30 years in court, mostly law enforcement, during which I have both prosecuted and defended the use of marijuana, it is my opinion (and it is my personal opinion as a citizen, not as a representative of any agency) that the costs of making marijuana illegal for adults far outweigh the benefits. Treat it like alcohol.
by your logic we should legalize methamphetamine and heroin. Those drugs kill more people, destroy more lives and lead to more violence than pot.
Your response is no different than the fake panic whipped up by national media over swine flu (gee, imagine our local alt weekly playing same game of fear tactics as national media, no way..).
While I agree that there should be no prohibition laws, (drugs, guns, you name it), we should be very clear why. It is not because we are scared of the violence we see, it is because of our inalienable right to the pursuit of life, liberty, and happiness afforded to us, theoretically, by our constitution.
Your cry of "Those who root for it to continue out of self-interest aren’t real Humboldt County people, and they are welcome to haul their asses out of town." rings as hollow as it did when Nixon and the conservatives used it against the war protesters in the 60’s.
What is a "real Humboldt County people"? someone who has moved north from Willits, as you have, to raise a family or start a profession? or is it the last-year transplant who has set up an illegal manufacturing business in the midst of a residential neighborhood? How about those redneck loggers you like to make fun of? Are they Humboldt?
exclusion of people who have a different opinion is not freedom, it is tyranny. I say ENOUGH of the us and them exclusion promulgated by this periodical to sell copy, bring us the Humboldt we desire and need, one that embraces diversity and difference of opinion as that what makes us the true rebel souls.
Dear Unanonymous, Your arguments ring hollow. Why not take your pit bull, red bull and big truck and go back to SoCal?
Since when does propping up the rotting apparatus of the Democrat machine make you an "unsung hero" to anyone besides party hacks?
I am so freakin’ over ballers.
It could be Wyeth or that punk next door.
I am finished with you.
Hank has absolutly nailed it and it’s about time someone with something to lose in this county finally did. Unanonymous, your overcaffeinated fears of impending tyranny are kinda pathetic. Hank was just issuing an invitation for asses to be hauled outward, not a threat. And when I hear diversity used as a way to alienate the greater majority of us (who actually DO enjoy and encourage real diversity– of thought and lifestyles within a positive, productive community) when we dare to suggest some responsibility for the consequences of all that blessed personal freedom you fantasize and shriek about, well we know what you’re peddlin, brother. Excuses, excuses. Back to the corner for you, and this time think about what you’ve done. Treehugger: very cogent, man. You brought clarity to yet another aspect of the damage this grey world of fuzzy morality and law is doing to our civilization. Hey, if laws are just suggestions for other people to follow, and the system is a joke, and we go our own peter pan ways in a cloud of buzz…well, where are we going to end up. Lonely sounds about right. What kid would have us, ultimately? Hey,don’t harsh my high, little dude, with your constant need to be taught right and wrong. Go play with your little friends. The future will take care of itself. Ask the 8000 dead down south (and the growing number locally) how mother nature and our own archaic laws have meshed. Ask the local dumbass (yours truly) who punches a clock 50 weeks a year to see 40% go to Uncle Sam while Neighbor Dude goes to Baja for three months every year yet still only pays $12 to DC. Ask the kids what to believe. The smart ones say, "you tell me", and don’t really expect much of an answer. We haven’t been giving them one for a long time. Maybe the time has come to air out the smoke and make things clearer. And one last thing–when you don’t create a society with a core, just a lot of lovely, squishy ideas about love and tolerance but no real willingness to face facts, the people who ultimatly control it are the ones with a center, usually a very dark one. Criminality begets bigger and more efficient criminality. My cartel is bigger than your cartel, senor, and we are coming for you. 14 pounds. Shit. For that we lost our souls.
"Hank was just issuing an invitation for asses to be hauled outward, not a threat"
this would accomplish diversity? When does an invitation become a threat?
by the way, when you say those of you who enjoy and encourage "real diversity" would that be diversity of opinion? Clearly not.
How about an article about someone who works hard, raises their children with care, and practices what they preach? Wouldn’t sell copy would it? No, so don’t expect any change in this paper soon, they will continue to sell the NCJ by glorifying mushroom tea quaffing stoners, $150K a year, non-medical growers, and Mexican cartels causing all the crime in this county. The latter being a racist position.
you declare you dare to suggest for consequences for ones responsibility, I would ask, who is asking for responsibility here, I just ask that the laws be applied and the law-breakers not be glorified.
as for the "blessed personal freedom", you make it sound like some conservative threat to our way of lives. It is what made our country free from tyranny for all, not just your tribe. I would ask, what are you afraid of?
Thank You, Hank, and Thank You TreeHugger for your post. Let’s get real, people. This isn’t working as an effective strategy for the best outcome for the most people. A simple cost-benefit analysis is all it takes to make that clear. And, there will always be those sectors of the population who don’t give a damn about the whole, who don’t see life as anything other than get the most you can for yourself at any cost to others. Enough said. Thanks, again, Hank!!
RIP LIL D
Happy 23rd bday my boy…. i miss you… i got ur name tatd on my neck