Rob Arkley at a 2013 Credit: File
Credit: File

Update: All charges against Elise Gerhart have been dismissed and her arrest record expunged based on a Nov. 4 order from Humboldt County Superior Court Judge Marilyn Miles that deemed Gerhart factually innocent in the case.

Update: Arrest records posted this morning by the Lost Coast Outpost show that the Eureka Police Department did in fact make four arrests at around 6 p.m. Wednesday night. Kimberly Lauren Starr, Stephanie Nicole Bartlett, Elise Alcyone Gerhart and Chad Alan Kemp were arrested on suspicion of crimes against the public peace. Gerhart and Kemp face the additional suspected arresting charges of assault and battery.

Previously: If Rob Arkley was looking to stir the pot when he proclaimed last week that the homeless have overrun Humboldt County and are living high on the hog thanks to all those public benefits available to them — well, mission accomplished.

Turns out a lot of people have something to say about that.

Hundreds packed into the Wharfinger Building on Wednesday evening to take part in the Eureka businessman’s community forum to address the homelessness “crisis.”

At 5:35 p.m., cars were still streaming toward the meeting site from both directions, and drivers lurched over a curb to park in a dirt lot beside the building’s jammed parking lot. On the front walkway, frustrated people jostled as police held them back, and one man briefly made a grab for the door before it closed. Several in the crowd shouted that they had RSVP’d, as requested, but the door monitors said that didn’t matter. The building was past capacity.

The Wharfinger Building holds 299 people in both the designated meeting room and on the adjoining deck, according to Alex Bippus, who said he was a Eureka city employee who helps run the site. Gradually, as people left, others were allowed in.

Arkley started off the meeting by outlining his own plans. First, he wants to form a committee — no, he said, he doesn’t have to be the chair — which will put a microscope on the Humboldt County Department of Health and Human Services. The committee, he said, will tear apart the department’s budget, looking for the mandates, grants and obligations the county has to provide services to the homeless. And don’t worry Phillip Crandall, Arkley understands that being the department head is a big job — the committee will just be looking to help. It will do that, he said, by identifying — he didn’t explain how — which programs are drawing the homeless to the area.

From there, Arkley wants to see the committee put pressure on the Humboldt County Board of Supervisors. Specifically, he wants to see the board weigh each spending decision for its possible “negative impact” on the community.
“I get the upside,” Arkley said. “The homeless are getting a meal. The homeless are getting a bath. The homeless are getting a place to stay. I get all that. But what about the downside to the community? What are the taxes, the soft taxes, to the community?”

Lastly, Arkley wants the supes to vote on each action involving the homeless, one-by-one. Following that framework, Arkley said, he is confident that a year from now, Humboldt will be a better place. We all just need to work together and cut out the fluff.

“This is a case where our desire to do right has become wrong,” Arkley said. “Too much right has become wrong. We’ve become an absolute magnet for the homeless unlike other communities.”

Not everyone was quite on the same page. Although most in the room agreed that homelessness is a big issue, few agreed on what should be done about it.

One woman suggested that Arkley “check his privilege.” Not all of us are rich, white males, she said. Her words were quickly drowned out by boos and jeers from the crowds, and for a moment it appeared that the meeting would dissolve into a giant shouting match. Moderator Shirley Fuller quickly stepped in, calling for respect and issuing a three minute limit for each speaker.

Sylvia De Rooy was greeted with applause when she stepped up to the microphone and questioned Arkley’s facts. “Virtually every premise that Arkley has put forward is a false premise,” she said.

“What will guarantee more homeless on the streets, is to cut off any existing support services,” Derooy said. “It’s nonsense to say we are being too generous in our help to homeless people. The truth is that what is being offered is grossly inadequate and that is the major case of the numbers of homeless people in our area.”

Several business owners took the opportunity to voice their concerns. One woman said she was tired of cleaning up defecation off her front stoop. Another said he thought a neighboring soup kitchen was luring in the homeless and driving away his female clients. When you drive through Eureka on a Sunday, it looks like you are riding into a toilet, he said.

Beverley Wolfe, owner of Avalon in Old Town, said she understands the issues — she was once homeless on the streets of New York, she said. But Eureka has a problem and its programs need scrutiny. The homeless issue is one of the reasons she said she decided to move her business to Fortuna.

Many who spoke at the forum did so over the noise of a screeching horn and the sound of banging drums from outside. Eureka Police Chief Murl Harpham later said that four protesters were arrested on suspicion of disturbing an assembly, resisting arrest and assault. Explaining the assault, Harpham said he was doused with a bottle of water in the melee.

By the end of the night, a harangued-looking organizer estimated attendance at over 300. About 35 had stopped to add their names to a fast-growing list of would-be committee members.

Some speakers, like Berti Welty, voiced caution as the committee moves forward.

Ward said there isn’t any one perfect answer. People should be held accountable for their behavior, but there should also be resources available to those looking to take control of their lives, she said. And some who suffer from mental conditions may not be able to seek out the help they need.
Eureka is not unique, Welty said.

“The real question is what are we as a town?” she said. “153 years ago, the good citizens of Eureka met to decide what was the problem with getting rid of the Indians. The result was a massacre. That community also drove all of the Chinese out of town and put them on barges. Is that the kind of community we want?”

Join the Conversation

21 Comments

  1. Really? “Too much right has become wrong” and no one laughed. Isn’t he simply paraphrasing (plagiarizing?) George Orwell? “War is peace. Freedom is slavery. Ignorance is strength.”

  2. A legal campground, legal RV parking / car camping, and ultra-low-cost shelter including social services – possibly limited to those who can show they are “locals, from Humboldt County” – would reduce the numbers of persons unsheltered and provide engagement. World Shelters remains prepared to participate in such an initiative.

  3. I’m sure that multi-millionaires are best qualified to determine “which programs are drawing the homeless to the area.”

  4. Where did Arkley get his money, besides inheritance? I think we ought to form a committee to put a microscope to every shady deal his family ever made, and pay all those people back who were worked to the bone to support his extravagance. And also make sure the Board of Supervisors checks everything they do to make sure it does not benefit the rich people.
    Then we can put his family on a barge and ship them all to China. There are a few Arkley homes that could house dozens of people.

  5. How long are we going to ignore the problem. It gets worse around the first of the month when money is handed out, cars being broken into for smash and grab thefts. Folks urinating and defecating on public structures, assaults, a generally dirty feel in the whole west half of old town, and needles strewn about open lots. I see a lot of problems here and nobody seems to think that someone with a lot of money has a reasonable thought on something to do about it.

  6. It would be interesting to me to find out where the homeless that are receiving benefits hail from originally. Are people drawn to Eureka because of the ease of getting these benefits?

  7. Bomba – Mr. Arkley’ proposal is NOT a reasonable “thought,” he is proposing a vigilance committee to get rid of people he does not like; namely the poor because they are ugly to him.

    There are very grave problems with homelessness, mental illness and poverty. A rich man proposing to get rid of the problems by getting rid of the poor people is an affront to all humane sensibility.

    Mr. Arkley’s proposal has been reviled by humanity for centuries, and yet it has been tried again and again by bigots, despots and mass murderers.

    Read Jonathan Swift’s “A Modest Proposal” written in 1729.

    Anyone who agrees with Arkley ought to re-think their principles of good and evil.

  8. I really don’t have a problem with us caring for homeless people , as long as they aren’t killing people with cross bows. Ms De Rooy and all the bleeding hearts out there need a reality check. Apparently, Ms De Rooy doesn’t have people defecating on her doorstep regularly.

  9. My Experience with Community Development –
    Having lived in a community in Southern California for 20 years where the
    community leaders made a number of poor decisions in the area of
    development, I would very much like to share my experience as to how the
    encouragement of tract housing development, and the opening of certain
    large publicly traded corporate retailers in the area, led to the downfall of
    my former community in key demographics.

    Crime and Income / Key Demographics –
    Currently, the crime rate in my former community exceeds 600 incidents per
    100k residents, and the median income (at $31,032 as of 2011) has also
    dropped, as many higher wage/income earners moved from the area due to
    crime concerns.

    Revenue Dependency –
    City leaders in my former community (through their budget process) became
    severely dependent on the construction revenue from housing tract developments
    to the point where the overbuilding eventually lended to over two thousand empty
    foreclosed properties (many ramsacked with broken windows, graffiti and squatters)
    during the 2008 housing crisis. This community has still not recovered (in terms of
    these key demographics) from that crisis.

    Human Footprint / Environmental Impact –
    I live in Fortuna now, and hope my story can aid and inspire community leaders
    in Humboldt county to do the right thing, consider the environmental impact of
    over development, and establish ways to bring additional revenue to Humboldt
    communities through technology, curbing our desire for a larger footprint of
    human impact in the area (air travel, light rails, etc), and instead focusing on
    ways our small business owners can sell their goods and services inside, and
    also OUTSIDE the county through the use of websites, technology, etc.

    The desire to create additional revenue for the county and cities should never be
    based solely on the a vision unwilling to consider the full environmental impact
    of these decisions.

    Call me a protectionist…I really love Humboldt, and want to see this area flourish
    in a responsible way.

    Attracting Higher Income Earners / Less is More –
    Instead of future housing developments, and more people travelling to Humboldt,
    per se, to create more city/county revenue, what we need is more revenue through
    the use of technology without the human environmental impact.

    Attracting custom home building with strategically increased property values, where
    custom homes are built in replacement of older homes (especially in Eureka), instead
    of using additional land or even considering tract homes, is a key area where community
    leaders can also become “good neighbors” to the community they serve.

    Studying Good Community Examples –
    Manhattan Beach, California and Redondo Beach, California are stellar examples where
    community leaders worked with custom home builders to replace the many (not most)
    of the 50 to 70 year old homes with newer, larger custom homes “one at a time” with strict
    restrictions on the style of new home being built (to keep in style with what is already
    in the community). This brought increased property value to those communities without
    additional land use, and was highly profitable for many of the contractors involved in the
    process.

    And believe me, as those newer, larger custom homes are built, you will attract higher
    income earners to the area, even if they are buying 2nd homes for the summer.

    Open Invitation –
    I would be happy to travel with you to my former community and show you the key areas
    where poor decisions were made, and can also show you first hand the effects of those
    decisions, especially on resources, such as water consumption, etc.

    Eureka (and the other Humboldt towns) have such potential…

    I believe the key is focusing on improving what we already have…

  10. Brent, I love a lot of what you just said there. The problem is, to build homes that you speak of would require custom home makers. The major players here in the greater Eureka area are the Piersons, Danco, and a small bunch of cronies who don’t WANT the area to get any larger thus losing some perceived marketshare that they have a foothold in right now. Its hard to grow when the folks with the means to accomplish that want the opposite.

  11. Homeless people aren’t the problem. Lack of proper community development is the problem. Take a look at Santa Monica, California. See what they have done for their homeless. See how the property values have remained high. What Humboldt needs is higher property values through responsible planning. Also, Humboldt needs to foster more entepreneurs bringing income in to the county from other counties, increasing Humboldt County’s tax base without increasing traffic. I’m a prime example. I have zero clients in Humboldt County, yet I have a business that is bringing in income from many other counties in California, and nine other states, and I spend all that money here in Humboldt while bringing in zero client foot traffic. We need more of that.

  12. Who cares how rich arkley is, or where he got is money? How does paying attention to that make Humboldt any better? Some of you need to get a life.

  13. Regardless of what your opinion of Arkley is, homeless/transients aren’t just looking for places to sleep they are (not all) committing lude behavior and at times, crimes against our community. We have personally been victim to this. It is hard to explain to my kids why a transient woman chooses to walk out in front of my car on Samoa bridge nearly being hit by cars to spit on them as they go by, why someone stands on a corner with a sign that says”you can verbally abuse me for spare change”, why an unfortunate soul rolls into the eureka co-op bleeding through the store in a hospital gown and wheelchair. These occurrences make me wonder what the heck is happening to this town? What about establishing more of what John Shelter offers with New Directions: have transient folks volunteer and get job training by local business owners. Perhaps have folks that are caught and released from county jail automatically go into a community volunteer program. And yes mental health and substance abuse issues have alot to do with things. My hope is that we can come together to find solutions for our community from this initial meeting.

  14. Yes, look beyond the Redwood Curtain for solutions. California is full of successes and failures (Mr. Arkley’s plan being one of the latter.)

    You want success? Look at Santa Monica, as has been mentioned. You want failure? Look at the City of Clearlake, where your cross-bow shooter came from. Now there is a city that is overrun with bad elements.

    In a lot of ways, Humboldt County ought to be proud of their homeless and ultra-poor. Many that arrive come because of some idealism of the redwoods, Humboldt State, or just plain California. Those that stay have to put up with the lousy climate, mostly living outdoors. Marijuana is about a benign a drug as you will find on the streets.

    Clearlake, on the other hand has a wonderful climate, and abundant natural beauty. Yet it is the methamphetamine capital of northern California, if not the whole USA. There is no opportunity, there are little if any services, and everybody hates the poor. One might think it was Mr. Arkley’s dream city.

    But guess what? Meth freaks KILL PEOPLE, either purposely or in cars. You want defecation on your sidewalks and crazy people walking out in traffic? Well you got that PLUS MURDER.

    There is no single solution, of course, but I say Humboldt is better off than many other areas and ought to look ahead progressively, and not go back.

    There is one thing I have learned over the years. If you give people their dignity back, they will often act accordingly.

    Mr. Arkley ought to know dignity does not cost the government a lot of money. And yet his act of merely speaking the way he did from his position will cost a whole lot more defecation and bad feelings. That’s right, Mr. Arkley has made the situation WORSE, and he ought to be roundly ostracized by the public..

    There needs to be a war on poverty. And not a war on the poor because everyone will lose that one. The rich will move away, leaving a stinkhole, while claiming they “tried.”

  15. To say that the transient population is at the head of Eureka’s problems takes a little self deception. The problems caused by drug use, gang activity, and low income are probably more pressing issues. Eureka isn’t pretty, and getting rid of visibly homeless people, even if was an easy thing to do, wouldn’t help that much. Whole neighborhoods could use a lot of sprucing up. There used to be funds available to help paint houses. Not any longer. The street tree program has only a limited amount of trees. The streets are not cleaned. Many poorer areas are not served by a community center. I have lived in the Bay Area, and a community activity center was the signature of an upbeat, attractive place to live. We could build walls to limit the noise from thoroughfares and commercial districts. And the public health– when you visit any of these places, the first thing you notice, is how healthy everyone looks. Perhaps the employers in Humboldt County could try to make sure that their employees are better cared for. Accomplishing all these signs of prosperity isn’t as simple as chasing a few bums away, by cutting the budget of any government program, easing up on zoning and environmental restrictions, or cutting taxes. It takes a lot of love. Arkley’s plan is the reverse of that.

  16. It is our duty to take care of “our own” home grown homeless but people are asking why are there so many homeless here that come from outside the area? Arkley suggests an examination of the Humboldt County budget and grant revenue programs will reveal we have become a MAGNET for homeless from outside Humboldt to enhance grant application eligibility for additional county revenues. Have certain department heads and local agencies increased their department revenue for services to the homeless by actively drawing additional homeless from outside Humboldt County?

  17. littlle help from friends-The Endeavor provided simple help–an JohnShelter had a good program– Portland Dignity Village self ruled–A magnet??–I learnd in Girl Scouts–If youwould have a friend, Be a friend–

    a lttle help might help—Raging Granny

  18. Sick of the Arkley rhetoric? This petition is for Humboldt County citizens that see the danger in Mr. Arkley and his supporters deciding what public services are available – and not available – for the poor.

    https://www.change.org/petitions/humboldt-county-board-of-supervisors-protect-health-and-human-services-programs-for-homeless-families-and-individuals-don-t-take-policy-directives-from-one-of-the-wealthiest-citizens-with-an-anti-government-and-anti-poor-agenda#

Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *