Four Humboldt State University mountain bikers boxed up each of their bikes and then paid more than $400 apiece to have them sent to Snowshoe, West Virginia, and back. The reason? The 2015 USA Cycling Gravity Mountain Bike Nationals. This weekend, HSU’s four riders are competing in the two highest levels of racing, professional and just below in the A-category.
“Gravity” races are single-run events that entail a speedy decline down an obstacle filled trail to the finish. This weekend’s events will include the dual slalom, and the downhill — Humboldt’s main focus.
In the downhill race, riders have one run to bolt down a trail spanning one or more miles. The trail is filled with sudden and sharp drops, tight berms and crumbly dry dirt. Any mistake can cost riders the entire race. This is the event our Humboldt Four are fond of. And here’s a brief introduction to each of HSU’s national competitors.
Racing in the professional category this weekend is journalism senior Ali Osgood. At last year’s nationals, Osgood won the downhill race in the women’s A-category — the highest amateur racing level. Her time of 5:07 would have landed her a fifth-place overall finish in the women’s professional category.
Reflecting on that performance gave her the drive that led her to turn professional. This year, she has her eyes on the podium and knows the only thing capable of holding her back is herself.
“Nat champs are a total mental game,” Osgood said. “Physically, I have practice runs, but mentally I focus and memorize the trail while keeping my nerves calm.”
Making his debut on the national stage this weekend is recreation senior Bo Hellams, who only started riding mountain bikes in October of last year. Despite the late start, Hellams knew he wanted to go to nationals, so he bought a ticket to Snow Shoe before the season and school had even started.
At his first collegiate race at University of Nevada, Reno’s event, Sky Tavern Sufferfest, he decided to skip the C category. Hellams’ confident racing proved he was capable of racing with the A group. With two first-place finishes (one in downhill, the other in dual slalom) Hellams was bumped up, just as he’d hoped.
The following weekend, Hellams hit the Stanford-hosted races and placed third in the downhill race. The weekend after, he took first in Humboldt’s home competition in downhill and fifth in the super-d event, a race that’s similar to downhill but covers a longer distance and requires more endurance. Through these complete races – and wins – he was officially qualified to register for nationals.
“I knew I wanted to go [to nationals], so I bought my plane ticket before I had even raced at Reno. There was a lot riding on those first three races,” Hellams said. “Pun intended, I guess.”
Humboldt’s third rider is also making her debut on the national stage this weekend, though this is recreation administration senior Sara Schneider’s fourth year riding with the HSU club. So far, her season has been successful and a big improvement from last year, starting with a pair of second-place finishes in Reno, where she closely trailed teammate Osgood.
At Humboldt’s home race, Schneider took first in the super-d and second in the downhill, again behind Osgood. Although the two battle on the track, they often train together, share advice and push one another to keep improving.
“[Osgood] has definitely had a huge influence on my riding,” Schneider said. “Every time we race it’s exciting to see the gap between our times get smaller.”
The fourth rider making the trip to represent Humboldt is geology junior Tyler Green, who has been riding with the club since he was a freshman and is making his first trip to nationals. Coming off of a shoulder injury he sustained on the Reno downhill course, Green is optimistic. He wants to see how he compares to other riders, but “is not expecting anything crazy.”
Most recently, Green finished fourth out of 45 riders at Humboldt’s home downhill race. As a junior, he has two more seasons to spend riding with the club and plans to begin training more seriously after competing in nationals this weekend.
“Since my shoulder is only about 75 percent, I want to go to nationals and get a feel for the competition and atmosphere,” Green said. “Next year, I definitely plan to qualify, train, return and win.”
This article appears in The Pitchfork and the Mouse.
Bicycles should not be allowed in any natural area. They are inanimate objects and have no rights. There is also no right to mountain bike. That was settled in federal court in 1996: http://mjvande.nfshost.com/mtb10.htm . It’s dishonest of mountain bikers to say that they don’t have access to trails closed to bikes. They have EXACTLY the same access as everyone else — ON FOOT! Why isn’t that good enough for mountain bikers? They are all capable of walking….
A favorite myth of mountain bikers is that mountain biking is no more harmful to wildlife, people, and the environment than hiking, and that science supports that view. Of course, it’s not true. To settle the matter once and for all, I read all of the research they cited, and wrote a review of the research on mountain biking impacts (see http://mjvande.nfshost.com/scb7.htm ). I found that of the seven studies they cited, (1) all were written by mountain bikers, and (2) in every case, the authors misinterpreted their own data, in order to come to the conclusion that they favored. They also studiously avoided mentioning another scientific study (Wisdom et al) which did not favor mountain biking, and came to the opposite conclusions.
Those were all experimental studies. Two other studies (by White et al and by Jeff Marion) used a survey design, which is inherently incapable of answering that question (comparing hiking with mountain biking). I only mention them because mountain bikers often cite them, but scientifically, they are worthless.
Mountain biking accelerates erosion, creates V-shaped ruts, kills small animals and plants on and next to the trail, drives wildlife and other trail users out of the area, and, worst of all, teaches kids that the rough treatment of nature is okay (it’s NOT!). What’s good about THAT?
To see exactly what harm mountain biking does to the land, watch this 5-minute video: http://vimeo.com/48784297.
In addition to all of this, it is extremely dangerous: http://mjvande.nfshost.com/mtb_dangerous.htm .
For more information: http://mjvande.nfshost.com/mtbfaq.htm .
The common thread among those who want more recreation in our parks is total ignorance about and disinterest in the wildlife whose homes these parks are. Yes, if humans are the only beings that matter, it is simply a conflict among humans (but even then, allowing bikes on trails harms the MAJORITY of park users — hikers and equestrians — who can no longer safely and peacefully enjoy their parks).
The parks aren’t gymnasiums or racetracks or even human playgrounds. They are WILDLIFE HABITAT, which is precisely why they are attractive to humans. Activities such as mountain biking, that destroy habitat, violate the charter of the parks.
Even kayaking and rafting, which give humans access to the entirety of a water body, prevent the wildlife that live there from making full use of their habitat, and should not be allowed. Of course those who think that only humans matter won’t understand what I am talking about — an indication of the sad state of our culture and educational system.
^^^This is the stupidest thing I have ever read. Sounds like someone used some 40 grit sandpaper to ream out your ass. You are an idiot.
You are so miss informed it is sad and if this is you, A CRIMINAL!
http://www.cyclelicio.us/2010/mike-vandema…
You are the misinformed one. All charges were dismissed, LIAR.