With 130 of 130 precincts reporting and 25,414 of 76,197 potential votes (33.35%) cast, this primary is history. Los resultados:
Humboldt County Supervisor, District 1:
Rex Bohn: 64.14% / 3,872 votes
Cheryl Seidner: 28.38% / 1,713
Annette De Modena: 7.12% / 430
Humboldt County Supervisor, District 2:
Estelle Fennell: 51.81% / 2,827 votes
Clif Clendenen: 47.76% / 2,606
Humboldt County Supervisor, District 3:
Mark Lovelace: 67.84% / 3,259 votes
Karen Brooks: 31.70% 1,523
Representative in Congress, District 2 (HumCo results ONLY — district-wide, Huffman and Roberts also finished one-two; click here for those results):
Jared Huffman: 27.39% / 6,366 votes
Dan Roberts: 18.52% / 4,306
Stacey Lawson: 13.35% / 3,104
Susan Adams: 13.08% / 3,041
Norman Solomon: 11.69% / 2,717
Mike Halliwell: 6.53% / 1,517
Brooke Clarke: 2.84% / 659
Andy Caffrey: 1.71% / 398
John Lewallen: 1.69% / 394
Tiffany Renee: 0.94% / 218
Larry Fritzlan: 0.55% / 129
UNRESOLVED WRITE-INS (!!!): 0.33% / 76
Proposition 28:
YES: 62.74% / 15,242
NO: 37.26% / 9,051
Proposition 29:
YES: 52.52% / 13,124
NO: 47.48% / 11,866
For the full monty from the Humboldt County Board of Elections, clicketh here.
This article appears in Amateur Hour.
0.33% / 76……..oh my!
0.33% / 76……..oh my!
sorry…..4 year old grand-kid got to my notebook……..
I expect when you get the pricinct results you will see that Southern Humboldt and Rex’s District had a better turnout. The other districts had nothing real on the ballot to turn out for.
totally sucks that the two true progressive liberals running for CA-2 split the vote, giving this district another BlueDog/ConservaDem Representation who will be a lapdog for the his Democratic Party leaders for years.
Good Job Humboldt Democrats……you’re not liberal at all. Please don’t claim to be.
Another dollar on cigarettes?… I wonder who’s pocket that will be swindled into. Cigarettes cause cancer, we know this. No more research.
All of the anti-Bohn smears in the NCJ for naught.
The Journal did further isolate itself to the liberal Arcata and MJ crowd and has lost its once held political importance. Ten years ago, the Journal had an impact on elections, not today. You have Judy’s snobbish comments and the edgy editorial policy that is targeted to students and young folks who tune out to local stuff.
Anti-Bohn smears? Did the NCJ post something that was untrue, or do you object merely because it portrayed Bohn (or his campaign staff) to be deliberately passing out misinformation? From the comments I read yesterday, I didn’t see anyone actually refuting the fact that those mailers were distributed exactly as shown.
like the name says, confused…..
Yeah, I also caught the snobbish tone Judy and others adopted towards the (shudder) truck driver.