Amy Ward, left, a 17-year-old senior at Fortuna’s East High, tours the College of the Redwoods campus with a friend. Ward hopes to attend CR in the fall. Credit: Photo by Ryan Burns

 

“We are here to stay.” That was the firm assurance given last week by College of the Redwoods Interim President Dr. Utpal Goswami. A composed Indian expat with salt-and-pepper hair, a trim moustache and a clipped, lilting accent, Goswami was speaking to an audience of about 50 in the wood-shingled Forum Theater on CR’s main campus, seven miles south of Eureka. It was a job interview, of sorts. Goswami is one of three finalists for the position of president/superintendent of CR, the North Coast’s only community college, with campuses from Crescent City to Fort Bragg. CR is now one step away from losing accreditation — a step that won’t be taken, Goswami promised, repeating his declaration: “We are here to stay.”

Even with that vote of confidence, there’s plenty of cause for concern at CR these days. Earlier this month the 48-year-old college was notified that it had been placed on “show cause” status by the Accrediting Commission for Community and Junior Colleges. This means that CR will have to submit a report to the commission by Oct. 15 explaining why accreditation should not be withdrawn. If that report and a subsequent visit by an evaluation team prove unconvincing, CR will lose accreditation in January of next year.

What then? Well, then chaos would ensue. Class credits from CR would no longer be transferable to four-year universities; attendance would plummet; government funding would evaporate. It would be the doomsday scenario, and for a college that serves more than 9,000 students across a district the size of Maryland, the fallout would be devastating.

Problems at CR run deep and, in some cases, date back many years. But administrators and educators are quick to point out that the deficiencies identified by the accrediting commission lie in planning, assessment and communication, not in the quality of education provided to students.

CR was placed on accreditation warning status in 2006 for its inadequate response to commission recommendations dating back to 1999. In 2007 the warning status was downgraded to “academic probation.” Faculty, staff and administrators took the sanctions seriously and worked hard to improve inter-department communication, develop clear goals and document progress toward those goals.

“We were on a pretty good path in 2007, 2008,” said John Johnston, an English professor and president of the College of the Redwoods Faculty Organization. CR was taken off probation in July 2008, and the president of the accrediting commission was impressed. She said CR had “given other colleges a model for how quickly and how well they can turn 180 degrees.”

But CR soon backslid during what Johnston called “the Marsee debacle.” Former President/Superintendent Jeff Marsee, who was hired just days before CR was taken off probation, has widely been blamed for irresponsible leadership characterized by overspending and a vindictive, dictatorial management style. “We were warned by the people at his previous college that he would probably try to break what we had and then rebuild it to his own liking,” Johnston said. “Unfortunately, when he broke it he never rebuilt it.” Marsee resigned last March to become president of Stockton’s San Joaquin Delta College, where he has since been placed on administrative leave after receiving “no confidence” votes from faculty and staff.

The accrediting commission sent another team to CR last October, and by the time the team left, Goswami and other administrators felt good about the direction of the college. They were encouraged by the exit interview with the team, especially after they read its evaluation report. It said the evaluators had been “fully prepared to find a college which had made little progress on the issues identified in previous accreditation visits” but instead found CR to be “in transition to a new era that would address each and every one of these issues.”

Maybe. A close read of the entire report reveals a more mixed assessment. Team members worried that the positive changes were “potentially transitory,” and they identified several commission standards that weren’t being met. For example, the college wasn’t articulating big-picture objectives in measurable terms or documenting student learning well enough, and the Board of Trustees hadn’t held Marsee accountable.

Back in the Forum Theater, Goswami told his audience that finger-pointing was pointless. “This is not the time to figure out who did what or who didn’t do what. This is the time to focus purposefully and deliberately on the things we have to do to get through the next eight or nine months.” Since October, he said, the college has continued to improve its practices. Of the seven recommendations made by the accrediting team, Goswami said only two remain unfulfilled: full assessment of student learning outcomes and comprehensive, integrated planning that spans across college departments. He’s confident that CR can rectify those in time for the October report to the accrediting commission.

Adding to CR’s woes, education funding has been dwindling fast, and the college is currently out of compliance with the state’s 50 percent law, which requires community colleges to spend at least half their revenue on academics, as opposed, for example, to building new facilities or creating a top-heavy administrative structure. (Marsee did both.) CR lost nearly half a million dollars last year due to trigger cuts in the state budget, and it will lose another $1.7 million if the governor’s tax initiative doesn’t pass in November. Last month, the Board of Trustees notified faculty and staff that layoffs may be necessary.

The hunt for a new president has been narrowed to three candidates — Goswami, Mendocino College President Kathryn Lehner and Pierce College Puyallup (Washington) President Dr. Patrick Schmitt. The Board of Trustees intends to select the permanent president by its March 14 meeting.

While Goswami was addressing a theater scattered with people concerned for CR’s future, 17-year-old Amy Ward, a senior at Fortuna’s East High, was walking through the college corridors with a campus map in hand. She’s hoping to enroll at CR in the fall.

“I’m really drawn to this place, partly because I heard they have really great classes,” Ward said. She also likes the campus and the region, and she appreciates CR’s cheap tuition. Ward hadn’t heard about the school’s accreditation problems, and when she did she wasn’t too worried. “It’s such a good program here and they help so many people that they’ll probably get back” out of sanctions, she said.

One condition of being placed on “show cause” status is that the school must submit a plan for the orderly shut-down of the institution. CR will submit a closure plan as required, but Goswami insisted that it’s just a formality; it won’t actually happen. Since the accrediting commission was formed in 1962 only one college has lost accreditation — Compton Community College in 2006, and that campus immediately transitioned into a learning center for the neighboring El Camino Community College.

“CR is so important to this area that we have no other choice,” Goswami said. “We have to make this institution the asset that the community believes it is.”

 

Ryan Burns worked for the Journal from 2008 to 2013, covering a diverse mix of North Coast subjects,...

Join the Conversation

30 Comments

  1. The main problem at CR is the board of trustees. 5 out of the 9 member board have been there since the first accreditation sanction and they still don’t get it. Instead they blame the accreditation team and say that CR is being picked on. WAKE UP! Do CR and the community it serves a favor and resign already. How much more can CR take?

  2. Joel, the way you keep bringing up that troll in my forum makes me think you did it. So tell me, how is it to be your age and still living off daddy??

  3. Says Joel Miekle, a failed artist and who can’t even keep his family members from killing themselves with drugs and alcohol.

    Unless of course, you enjoy getting that money from them dying. It’s the only way you’ve ever gotten ahead, so why try working now?

  4. What worries me most is when people in authority say “don’t worry” but keep following the same path and the same actions that led to the problems in the first place. The management and administrative culture continues to be one of “we just need to meet these obligations and requirements” but fails to fully integrate the changes as accreditation really wants the college to do and in fact has told us this many many times. They don’t want just a pretty report. They want CR to change their sloppy management ways and show evidence and proof of planning and decision making processes.

  5. Yeah, keep thinking that Joel, you better go check up on your meth abusing family members. Must be really shitty to know that the only reason you where able to buy your house wasn’t because of hard work, but because you inherited money. At least you didn’t snort your inheritance up your nose, unlike others.

  6. You’d think after the Abe Ali SNAFU, they would have gone over everything with a fine toothed comb. But as is common with colleges, nothing is said, he made out like a bandit, and has another college job.

    It’s pretty sad that Stockton and Bakersfield are getting CR’s cast-offs, and are like “these people are trash”

  7. Your the one claiming to know things, Mouse. Oh, and let me know where I can pick up that big inheritance.

  8. Alright you guys, break it up.

    Joel, I’m seeing a pattern here. You need to get a new hobby and stop stalking people on the net. There are a lot of folks in blog world that I don’t care for either, but harassing them over something completely irrelevant to the article is completely out of line.

  9. Gina Marie: I am in complete agreement with you. It appears that CR’s top administrative structure (even a year after Marsee’s departure) is still stuck in its ways, and won’t fully and meaningfully embrace the significant institutional paradigm shifts that the accrediting commission requires. Key CR administrators still think that if they can just wordsmith the report more convincingly, the ACCJC still won’t notice the lack of actual evidence and authentic adherence to the standards. They tried this last year and it obviously failed. CR could indeed lose its accreditation if they push for a warmed-over redux of this very risky strategy again.

  10. It makes me sad to read this. CR was a great school when I attended in the mid-seventies. I guess its gone down the toilet just like everything else in Humboldt. But not to worry, the Progressives have everything under control.

  11. It still is a great school–just ask our current students. We just need to finally, after all these years, fully embrace the organizational structure and culture that our accrediting commission demands of us. We’ll then be a more fiscally stable and even more student-centered college. The ACCJC’s standards will dramatically improve our governance operations and make us truly great. We will get there.

  12. Don’t let the school board off the hook either. Let’s remember that they are public officials and we, the community, elect them into office. Those 5 board members that have been there since the first sanction should answer to our community. How many times can you be hit by the same rock? Are you blind, stupid, or just collecting the benefits? Do you not care?

  13. The complete accreditation report from the team visit can be found on CR’s website at:

    http://www.redwoods.edu/Accreditation/documents/CollegeoftheRedwoodsCompEvaluationTeamReportDecember212011.pdf

    Here are a couple of excerpts:

    On page 4 of the report:

    “The college has had several presidents and interim presidents over the last few years with an accumulation of bad feelings, poor continuity of college processes, and a general attitude of uncertainty and mistrust. This underlying climate was clear to the team in reviewing the Self Study. The team found that the climate had improved considerably under the current interim president…”

    The next paragraph continues:

    “The team was fully prepared to find a college which had made little progress on the pervasive issues identified in previous accreditation visits and in previous recommendations. However, after considerable investigation and many interviews, a clearer picture emerged. College of the Redwoods is in transition to a new era that would address each and every one of these issues…”

    Near the conclusion of the report on page 87:

    “It was clear to the team through examining the Self Study, conducting interviews, and reviewing documents that prior to the last six months, the college did not function under a collegial governance model, did not set priorities through an evidence-based planning and budgeting process, did not support the use of student learning outcomes as a driver of resource allocation, and did not follow established processes to evaluate planning and implementation efforts.”

    The report concludes in the following paragraph:

    “The newly installed interim president/superintendent has established an environment of collegiality, has initiated many policies and procedures that involved dialog and collegiality in decision making, and has begun planning processes that have the potential to provide an integrated, data-driven decision making process for the college, although these latter efforts are too new to evaluate their impact and the leadership of the interim president/superintendent is not established as being able to continue these efforts pending the outcome of the current search for a permanent president/superintendent.”

    Hopefully CR can continue on this course and address all the issues raised by the ACCJC.

  14. Thanks for the post Kevin! It seems clear that they want to ensure CR keeps moving forward. But what about those board members. Should we let them off the hook? They are the ones who hire all the idiots that allow CR to go downward or get on the brink of bankruptcy. Seems they should be held accountable for all this mess.

  15. Did we not hear about toxic environment at CR due to you know who? Now it is the board’s turn. At this rate they will outdo Marsee. Get ready to kiss *** or better yet start looking for jobs.

  16. The report excepts posted on 12:18, 2/29 reflect the atmosphere at the college in Fall 2011. History shows that when presidents become less than collaborative and begin to act in a dictatorial nature the Board is slow to respond. What is the nature of collaboration and leadership today at CR? Does the Board know? If cracks develop in the performance of an inexperienced interim president, will the Board be willing to chose an experienced president with a proven track record of long term collaboration and successful running of a college?

  17. One thing about the Board is they always do a self evaluation, over a decade the same Board, I guess they think they are doing a good job?

Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *