The vandalized Six Rivers Medical Center in Willow Creek.
Photo by Ken Malcomson
Some time between 6 o’clock last night and early this morning, somebody (or bodies) journeyed between Willow Creek and Burnt Ranch spraying blood-red opposition to vaccinations on school buildings, medical clinics, sidewalks and the k-rails — concrete barriers — lining the highway.
The Humboldt County Sheriff’s Department is investigating but as of midday today had no leads, said Sheriff’s Department spokesperson Brenda Godsey.
Terry Bray, administrative assistant to the principal at Trinity Valley Elementary School, arrived at work at 7:30 this morning to see “SV40” and “VAX waiver” spray painted in red on the school’s outside cafeteria wall, and a skull and crossbones spray painted on the school’s new office sign in front. She said a bus driver told her he’d noticed the graffiti when he got in at 6:15 a.m. Bray filed a report with the Sheriff’s Department, and the school’s maintenance person got to work.
“We’ve already gotten it off, though,” she said this morning. “And we repainted the cafeteria, so the kids really didn’t even have to see it.”
Behind the elementary school, which is on State Highway 96 in Willow Creek, the word “autism” was spray painted on the preschool.
Not far away, at the Willow Creek Community Health Center, on Highway 299, workers arrived at work at 8 a.m. to see “VAX” and a skull with Xs for eyes spray painted on the front of the building, and “SV40” and “autism” spray painted on one side and the back of the building, all in two- to three-foot high letters, said receptionist and medical records clerk Kelly Earls.
“It was a surprise,” she said, adding they’d had no hint or threats that this was coming.
The clinic had to hire a painter, and was waiting for him to arrive at about midday today and so had not yet figured the cost of repainting.
Meanwhile, at Six Rivers Medical Center, on Highway 96 in Willow Creek, “cancer,” “VAX,” “SV40” and a skull were spray painted on the front of the building, and “autism” was painted on the sidewalk in front of it.
“This was a total surprise,” said clinic manager Debbie Mitchell.
Burnt Ranch Elementary School, about 15 miles up the road in Trinity County, similarly was vandalized with “VAX,” the skull and “VAX waiver.” By 5 p.m. today, the school was still working on removing the graffiti, said Superintendent Sarah Supahan. Ironically, today also was the day the school held its first “celebration of character” assembly of the year.
“We emphasize a different character trait each month,” Supahan said. “And this month was ‘trustworthiness.’ So the teacher in charge was asking, ‘What does it mean to be trustworthy?’ And the students were giving different examples. And then one student said, ‘It means not spray painting your school.'”
Supahan said they’re stumped as to who did it. “We haven’t had complaints,” she said. “There’s been no parent concern about vaccinating. Our parents are aware we have a waiver.”
The Sheriff’s Department’s Godsey said Deputy Greg Barry, on his way to investigate the vandalism in Burnt Ranch, discovered the spray painted k-rails along the way.
“So obviously whoever did this is mobile,” Godsey said.
Bray, at Trinity Valley Elementary School, said she figured the graffiti was done by an adult or adults “because they spelled everything right.”
Bray said she Googled “SV40” to find out what it means. “SV40” stands for “Simian Virus 40” and refers to a tumor-causing virus that was found in monkey kidney cells that were used to create the first polio vaccine. The cells’ use was eliminated by 1963, according to the SV40 Cancer Foundation, but “it has been alleged that there have been SV40-contaminated batches of oral polio vaccine administered to some children until the end of the 1990’s,” says the foundation’s Web site.
As for the word “autism,” Bray said she’s aware that some people believe that vaccines can cause autism.
But Bray and others said they didn’t know why they’d been targeted. School kids have to get vaccinated for a number of things — including polio, mumps, measles and rubella — unless their parents sign a waiver, said Bray. But the school hasn’t been pushing the vaccines, she said.
At the Willow Creek Community Health Center, RN Clinic Coordinator Erica Dykehouse said her first thought when she saw the graffiti this morning was that perhaps it had been done by the parent or relative of someone who has been diagnosed with autism.
Dykehouse said there is no known cause of autism. But, she said, about 12 years ago the medical journal
The Lancet
published an article linking the mumps-measles-rubella vaccine to cases of autism. “But every study that I’ve read [since then] has shown that the article was based on data that had been altered to show a link between autism and the preservative that was used in vaccinations at the time, called thimerosal,” said Dykehouse.
Regardless, thimerosal has been eliminated from most vaccines, she said, and her clinic administers thimerosal-free vaccinations.
“I wondered why we got hit,” Dykehouse said. “We don’t force parents to vaccinate their children, and we do explain to them the risks of it, and we do explain to them that even though there’s no link between thimerosal and autism, they went ahead and just took it out of vaccines in 2002.”
Even so, she said she can sympathize with worried parents. “Just looking at it from a parent’s perspective, you are responsible for this other being, and every decision you make on their behalf you’re wondering, what are the consequences going to be? So, if there’s any doubt whether to give your child an immunization, and you’re really worried about autism … and you made that decision [to immunize], and it turned out there was a link, discovered later down the line, I can see where parents would be reluctant to give immunizations. But then when you look at small pox, or whooping cough — which does go around quite frequently — or polio, you have to weigh that against the risk of being vaccinated. And there is such a large pocket of children around here who are not vaccinated … that we don’t have insulation [against those preventable diseases]. And then, you have people who travel overseas to areas where the disease is prevalent, and then come back here with the disease and pass it on to children who aren’t vaccinated.”
She said people who haven’t seen what a case of measles or polio or some other preventable and perhaps debilitating disease looks like, they might not have a sense of “how terrible it is” and not understand the risk.
“But if they would actually see a case of measles, or actually see a case of polio, people might think differently about it,” she said.
Bray, at Trinity Elementary, said even if you’re vehemently anti-vaccines, “this is not the way to get your point across.”
“Schools are in financial crisis as we speak and we just really don’t have the money or the time to have to deal with something like this,” Bray said. “I know our maintenance person has been working on it all morning.”
As a side note, the character trait for next month’s assembly at Burnt Ranch Elementary School is “Respect.”
This article appears in Mall Town.



Ignorance makes people do strange things.
Your government has been known to lie to you…
It is so sad that people feel the need to violate the space of children. It does nothing to support anyones cause; it only creates fear, uncertainity, and sadness in an environment that for some children is the only safe and stable one they have.
If there’s evidence that a vaccine is not safe, let’s investigate and evaluate the evidence. Graffiti is not evidence. Fear of your government is not evidence. Vandalizing a school is pretty damn low.
How do you purpose to evaluate the evidence when many fear the actual facts presented by the different sides?
That is what direct action is about, to bring pressure and attention on an issue to drive information review.
in war, there is horror.
if ignorance is bliss then why are there not more happy people; what a deplorable act
Ask a microbiologist about vacs and the pros and cons
damaging a clinic just does no justice
Damaging a clinic, with some spray paint to garner attention and some free press, or damaging a clinic like the way people deal with in Afghanistan and Iraq on a daily basis?
Let put this in perspective, clearly you have a very safe and pampered existance.
Damaging a clinic, with some spray paint to garner attention and some free press, or damaging a clinic like the way people deal with in Afghanistan and Iraq on a daily basis?
Let put this in perspective, clearly you have a very safe and pampered existance.
How do I propose evaluating the data? I read the opinions of those more learned than myself and look to peer-reviewed journals where data is analyzed without inflamed rhetoric.
There is no defense for vandalizing a school. Money spent repairing damage caused by superstitious cowards is money not spent enriching the education of my children. I consider school vandalism to be nothing short of stealing from children.
If you have actual scientific evidence that shows a vaccine being administered today is not safe, please, by all means, share a link to a peer-reviewed journal article. Or, share a link to an article written by a reputable news organization and we’ll assess whether the reporter knows anything about science or is merely parroting fears expressed by people who have formed opinions despite a lack of evidence.
Before you share, do some googling because the claim you’re thinking of submitting has most likely been debunked.
ok.. I must be all alone here, no wait
http://www.webwire.com/ViewPressRel.asp?aId=104933
let me dig up a peer review journal as that seems to be what you are demanding as "proof"
Yes, a peer-reviewed journal article would be nice. It kind of goes along with, ya know, the basis of science. It’s how we distinguish reality from superstition. Claims can be examined and tested and verified or invalidated. It opens a claim to proper scrutiny.
Here’s a song my 5-year-old has been listening to for the last couple weeks. There are a few things to learn from it.
Hey AJ,
if you think peer review is FACT then we need to discuss more than just h1n1
http://www.sltrib.com/news/ci_13457247
take HISTORY for example.
History doesn’t tell us whether a vaccine made today is safe. Apples and oranges.
The pertinent modern data referenced in the article has been separated from any contextual meaning.
Six deaths? Out of how many vaccinated? When were they vaccinated? It’s possible they were vaccinated too late in proximity to the time of infection. Not to mention that they died of viral pneumonia and pregnant unvaccinated women also get viral pneumonia.
Oh, here’s one pesky little fact… the flu vaccine doesn’t even claim to protect from viral pneumonia. The newspaper statistic cited is cited in a manipulative manner.
No vaccine is perfect. People with a prone underlying condition can have a bad reaction to any vaccine, but it’s like wearing a safety belt in your car. Your odds of survival are far better with the belt than without.
But if you talk to my aunt who was ejected in a vehicle collision and survived, she’ll testify that if she’d been belted in her particular situation she would have been decapitated in the crash. Her personal story is compelling, but scientifically we know the odds of survival are much better using the belt.
So when we hear about a small number of bad vaccine reactions (or what we assume were vaccine reactions in the absence of evidence that they are) do we ignore the data and be swayed by the anomalous personal story or do we trust statistical probability? Well, if you understand mathematics, you trust the data.
There is a vaccine trial underway for pregnant women, and I’m interested to see the results.
There is no cover-up or conspiracy. Doctors inform their patients and give them a choice, as well as a recommendation, and, weighing the risk factors of the patient, the recommendation is usually to get vaccinated.
Here’s another relevant song from my daughter’s music collection.
right, right… its just this darn peer review thing you are demanding… it seems to take time.
still diggin, found this, although it is just Canada who isnt as freedom oriented when it comes to the press and AMA.
Kendall said the decision rested in part on a new Canadian study — which has not yet been peer reviewed or published –that found those who receive the seasonal flu vaccine become two times more likely to get H1N1.
http://www.vancouversun.com/health/suspends+shot+campaign+over+H1N1+concerns/2045733/story.html
Key words: "not yet been peer reviewed or published"
Here’s an interesting bit from the LA Times health reporter: "So far, no one else had found similar data. That should be a ‘red flag’ that there is something wrong with the findings, experts said. Perhaps there is a statistical problem, a study bias or some other methodological problem that will become apparent only when the paper is subjected to intense analysis."
Science favors reproducible results. If no other country in the world is seeing similar results, do you conclude the vaccine is bad, or do you question that researchers in that single instance may have made an error? Me, I wait for the peer review. Others, well, they vandalize schools in an attempt to intimidate and bully people out of making their own health choices.