Editor:
Most people will agree that Jason Singleton is unscrupulous and an embarrassment to the legal profession (“Blog Jammin’,” Dec. 26). Protesters, however, have said they never before demonstrated or carried signs. The implication is that they would not stand up for people less fortunate, but are genuinely upset if they, themselves, lose access to their favorite restaurant.
Terence Marlow, Trinidad
This article appears in Unequal Opportunities.
Terence, you ain’t right. These people ARE standing up for people less fortunate – people losing their business to this slime-bag Singleton. Your implication is that, before protesting anything, you must protest everything that ain’t right in this world, which of course would have me up in your yard with a picket sign. Steve Parr, Eureka