Editor:
Here is a copy of the letter I am sending to all my legislators and to the governor (“Blackout,” Oct. 17). I urge everyone to contact their legislators and the governor.
“Dear _________,
PG&E’s latest outrage was not acceptable. It had nothing to do with fire safety in my area, Humboldt County, and I suspect damn little to do with safety in any area. It was extortion presented as political theater.
Regarding a Public Utility’s responsibility for fires started by their equipment: If the company was guilty of gross negligence, something all too believable in the case of PG&E, then of course they should be held responsible. But when their equipment is up to date and properly maintained, meeting current safety standards and laws, then a resulting fire is called an Act of God and the utility should not be responsible. I suspect PG&E has been held responsible for too many of the later, and hence their reaction. Their outrage was still not acceptable.
Thanks,
David Callow
Glendale”
David Callow, McKinleyville
Editor:
Mary Sanger is woefully ill informed to believe that the proposed Terra-Gen corporate wind farm would somehow provide “more renewable energy generation right here where we need it” (Mailbox, Oct. 17). In fact, the exact opposite is true.
Power from the wind farm proposed for Monument and Bear River ridges would only feed the existing grid. If PG&E again shuts off power to our area, then this source of electricity would go down, as well.
Also, in a bitter irony, the Terra-Gen wind farm would require 25 miles of new grid tie-in lines strung through tinder-dry brush and forest — thus increasing the very risk of fire that is causing the power shutoffs in the first place.
Considering the devastating impacts that wind power would have on the fragile and irreplaceable habitat of Monument and Bear River ridges, and understanding that the project would significantly increase the threat of fire in our area while providing zero energy resilience, it’s obvious that the project should be abandoned.
The only real means of achieving energy resilience is in solar-powered microgrids, as proven during blackout by the Blue Lake Rancheria. Solar is safe and efficient, increasingly affordable, could provide all the power we need and — something that Terra-Gen would like you to forget — it would put the power and profits of energy generation back into the hands of the people.
Greg King, Arcata
Editor:
If you were discomforted without PG&E electricity for 24 hours, you should be delighted to know that you have proven, lower cost choices to avoid such discomfort in the future.
The Blue Lake Rancheria’s solar rooftop system clearly demonstrated that achieving energy independence is possible with preparation, allocation of resources and political commitment. Solar is prudent, available, reliable, cost effective and a good investment.
Rather than prioritizing implementation of widespread solar, Redwood Coast Energy Agency has focused on expensive, utility scale onshore wind with dangerous transmission lines through fire-prone forests.
Our policy makers need to proactively deploy a variety of appropriate distributed energy strategies, including installing solar panels on county buildings, infrastructure, equipment yards and parking lots to realize the resilience so critical to our county during emergencies.
Instead, our policy makers and supervisors are surrendering obscene profits at our expense to Terra-Gen, rather than developing energy independence for us constituents. This is not doing our part to alleviate the climate emergency, but rather is conceding to a colonizing global powerhouse whose mission is to increase, not reduce, energy use.
Electricity from biomass and Terra-Gen costs $50 to $65 per megawatt or more than five times as much as my rooftop solar, and we would own nothing after decades of payments; yet RCEA has deployed far less than 8 megawatts of solar of its 30-megawatt goal.
RCEA ignores the opportunity to support agriculture by placing translucent bifacial solar panels over fields in Rohnerville, Loleta, Kneeland and the Arcata flats while conducting agriculture beneath.
As we commemorate Indigenous Peoples, and look back in horror at the genocide and ecocide committed by our local founding fathers, we can finally honor the wisdom of the Wiyot Tribe, which opposes Terra-Gen’s industrial wind factory — and solarize, not cannibalize, our precious resources.
Jesse Noell, Elk River
Editor:
It’s hard to read the PG&E blackout story without appreciating this opportunity to learn to solarize our county. The day of the “blackout” was plenty sunny to keep the fridge going with a few solar panels, overnighting to the next day.
Those few with solar panels and batteries were fine, often powering one or two critical circuits. We realized that mini-solar grids could serve multiple dwellings and neighborhoods, sharing energy. At least one techie with an electric vehicle lit his home with his car battery.
Social media flooded us with advice, with one solar expert offering to finance rooftop solar for the cost of a PG&E bill.
We learned the crucial distinction between centralized and distributed power generation, the former coming from the grid, the latter originating close to where it is used. And we learned that over-reliance on the grid and its incendiary transmission lines, even if our local production were “islanded,” leaves us vulnerable, especially in real emergencies that cut us off from services and each other. Terra-Gen’s wind factory would not have helped.
Mad River Hospital’s diesel generators consumed 10 gallons an hour, pumping 220 pounds of CO2 per hour into our climate emergency. Multiply that by the 100 generators sold out in one day at one store, and multiply that by 100 around the county, add in all the greenhouse gasses (GHGs) from drilling, refining and barging those fossil fuels, and you have a recipe for climate suicide.
With distributed solar, we can reduce our energy consumption and GHG emissions, have secure resilience during emergencies, fuel electric vehicles affordably and own our mini-solar systems over time. It’s the best way for us to do our part for the climate emergency. Now that we are smarter, do we have the political will?
Ken Miller, McKinleyville
Editor:
If we learned one thing from the blackout, it’s this: Humboldt County needs to use what power it can generate here and not depend on the grid.
But we knew that one. With a history of a rugged embrace of living close to the ground, living within our means and independent of the over-developed south, Humboldt pioneered the “off the grid” life decades ago. (Some may say centuries ago.)
Let’s not fear the next step and, following in the path laid down by the Blue Lake Rancheria, truly be responsible for our electrical needs. Rooftop solar and other renewables should be organized into decentralized local power grids. PG&E’s one-grid-fits-all model is unreliable, vulnerable and requires hugely expensive upgrades and maintenance. Now is the time to transition out of that failing grid into something that reflects our strengths and values.
It is fitting that both Blue Lake and Wiyot people are leading the way. The mega wind farm around Scotia would be a step backward: tearing up the countryside, exporting power and dollars and, with increasing frequency, leaving us powerless.
Michael Evenson, Petrolia
This article appears in The Island’s Return.

I ALSO AGREE THAT WE SHOULD GO WITH SOLAR MICROGRIDS AND EVERY BUSINESS ROOF TOP SHOULD HAVE SOLAR PANELS ON IT IF YOU WANT TO DO BUSINESS IN EUREKA; I RENT SO CANNOT PUT UP SOLAR PANELS ON MY HOME BUT I SURE AS S**T CAN GO OUT AND BUY A SOLAR POWERED GENERATOR……..PAT KANZLER
How does Michael Evenson propose to pay for such micro grids? The Blue lake one was a $5 million grant, and would power some 35 homes, at $142,785 per house. And if you make them all separate grids like he wants, then you have the worst of the environmental costs. Being a small island power system means you can’t sell your extra or get extra from others. That means running generators when its cloudy for those long winter days/weeks. Generators are incredibly polluting and they run on fossil fuels, batteries are extremely toxic, and all of that comes with a heavy environmental cost, but they don’t mention that do they?
Here we are in the midst of actual climate change, on the ground now, not in the future and people like Micheal and Ken Miller and Greg King want to sell you on the lies that going it alone, cutting yourself off from the rest of the planet is the way to go. What these people don’t want you to understand is that climate change has no boundaries, not watersheds, or counties or states or countries or continents. It is killing plant and animal life all over the planet, killing at a faster rate than at anytime in recent history, and they are fine with that as long as they kill the wind project.
The only way we can hope to go forward is with green energy, in all forms as fast as we can.
The wind farm is an acknowledgment of the present and future not the past, these so called environmentalists are living in the past. Its time for the future, that the climate emergency is real, its here, right now, and that we can do something about it now. It will take solar 200 years to make what the wind project will do here in Humboldt as soon as its installed. If you care about the local and world environment, the local economy, you and everyone you know, you are for this project. Call your supervisor and all the environmental groups and tell them yes to wind.
We can start paying for solar panels with the money we save by not forcing ratepayers to fund outrageous salaries EVERY YEAR at supposedly bankrupt corporations like PG+E. Lobbying costs are totally out of control too. https://www1.salary.com/PGandE-CORP-Execut… This site uses cookies and other similar technologies to provide site functionality, analyze traffic and usage, and deliver content tailored to your interests. | Learn More
I Accept
http://Salary.com
Personal
Data
Business Solutions
Learn
About Us
PG&E CORP
Compensation by Company
For its 2019 fiscal year, PG&E CORP, listed the following executives on its annual proxy statement to the SEC
Equity
Cash Compensation
Other
Fiscal Year Ended in 2019
Name and title
total compensation
Nickolas Stavropoulos
Special Advisor, Pacific Gas and Electric Company
$3,714,578
John R. Simon
Executive Vice President and General Counsel, PG&E Corporation
$2,920,863
Geisha J. Williams
Chief Executive Officer and President, PG&E Corporation
$9,249,501
David S. Thomason
Vice President, Chief Financial Officer, and Controller, Pacific Gas and Electric Company
$708,658
Jason P. Wells
Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer, PG&E Corporation
$3,197,274
Patrick M. Hogan
Senior Vice President, Electric Operations, Pacific Gas and Electric Company
$1,320,654
Jesus Soto Jr.
Senior Vice President, Gas Operations, Pacific Gas and Electric Company
$1,926,718
Steven E. Malnight
Senior Vice President, Energy Supply and Policy, Pacific Gas and Electric Company
$1,714,610
Enter an executive or company name
The charts on this page feature a breakdown of the total annual pay for the top executives at PG&E CORP as reported in their proxy statements.
Total Cash Compensation information is comprised of yearly Base Pay and Bonuses. PG&E CORP income statements for executive base pay and bonus are filed yearly with the SEC in the edgar filing system. PG&E CORP annual reports of executive compensation and pay are most commonly found in the Def 14a documents.
Total Equity aggregates grant date fair value of stock and option awards and long term incentives granted during the fiscal year.
Other Compensation covers all compensation-like awards that don’t fit in any of these other standard categories. Numbers reported do not include change in pension value and non-qualified deferred compensation earnings.
Name And Title Total Cash Equity Other Total Compensation
Nickolas Stavropoulos
Special Advisor, Pacific Gas and Electric Company
$628,266 $3,000,077 $86,235 $3,714,578
John R. Simon
Executive Vice President and General Counsel, PG&E Corporation
$599,000 $2,250,097 $71,766 $2,920,863
Geisha J. Williams
Chief Executive Officer and President, PG&E Corporation
$1,079,167 $8,000,081 $170,253 $9,249,501
David S. Thomason
Vice President, Chief Financial Officer, and Controller, Pacific Gas and Electric Company
$323,718 $325,040 $59,900 $708,658
Jason P. Wells
Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer, PG&E Corporation
$625,000 $2,500,123 $72,151 $3,197,274
Patrick M. Hogan
Senior Vice President, Electric Operations, Pacific Gas and Electric Company
$424,975 $800,092 $95,587 $1,320,654
Jesus Soto Jr.
Senior Vice President, Gas Operations, Pacific Gas and Electric Company
$474,333 $1,400,093 $52,292 $1,926,718
Steven E. Malnight
Senior Vice President, Energy Supply and Policy, Pacific Gas and Electric Company
$460,633 $1,200,093 $53,884 $1,714,610
Browse Executives by First Name
Browse Companies by Company Name
This report is not for commercial use. Thorough reviews have been conducted to assure this data accurately reflects disclosures. However for a complete and definitive understanding of the pay practices of any company, users should refer directly to the actual, complete proxy statement.
Use of Data / Disclaimer
The information shown here is a reporting of information included in the company’s proxy statement. The proxy statement includes footnotes and explanations of this information plus other information that is pertinent in assessing the overall value and appropriateness of the compensation information. For those interested in conducting a detailed compensation analysis, we recommend that you review the entire proxy statement. You may retrieve the full proxy statement by going to the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) website at http://www.sec.gov and entering the company’s name and then looking in the first column for an entry of “Form DEF 14A” (or any similar code). You may also find the annual proxy statement by going directly to the company’s website.
What is a proxy statement?
A proxy statement (or “proxy”) is a form that every publicly traded U.S. company is required to file with the U.S. Securities & Exchange Commission (SEC) within 120 days after the end of its fiscal year. The proxy must be sent to every shareholder in advance of the company’s annual shareholders meeting. All proxy statements are public filings made available to the general public by the SEC.
The proxy statement’s main purpose is to alert shareholders to the annual meeting and provide them information about the issues that will be voted on during the annual meeting, including decisions such as electing directors, ratifying the selection of auditors, and other shareholder-related decisions, including shareholder-initiated initiatives. Also, proxies must disclose specific detailed information regarding the pay practices for certain executives.
[Job Valuation Reports]
Personal
What are you worth?
Find out what you should earn with a customized salary estimate and negotiate with confidence.
Business
CompAnalyst
Stay competitive with the world’s most innovative compensation software solution.
http://Salary.com
Connect with Us
Visit us on: Linked In Twitter Facebook
Home
Personal
Data
Business Solutions
Learn
About Us
Careers
Contact
2019 http://Salary.com. All rights reserved.
Legal Privacy Policy Terms of Use