Join the Conversation

3 Comments

  1. Neither seem particularly cruel. The poodle guy is benign and makes a pretty good case for his care and concern of his dogs. The bubbles might be cruel from the standpoint they take teenagers’ money for something that provides zero thrill and even less entertainment value.

  2. More importantly perhaps is the questionable need for the NCJ’s command to “discuss”. Do we really need you to tell us o comment? Maybe that is why no one does.

  3. Here’s the difference: the dogs get no say, the teens presumably are doing what they’re doing (however stupid) because they want to. And- maybe the teens are even having fun.

Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *