Credit: Shutterstock/Miles Eggleston

By now, just about everyone has seen the photograph. It’s of a brunette white woman standing on the Humboldt County Courthouse lawn with a smattering of American flags in the background. Her head is cocked to the right, sunglasses covering her eyes and a red bandana tied around her neck above a jean jacket. In her hands, a vilely racist sign. It reads “MUZZLES ARE FOR DOGS AND SLAVES. I AM A FREE HUMAN BEING,” with an iconic image of enslaved black Brazilian woman Escrava Anastacia wearing a muzzle next to the words.

The photo was taken by Journal contributor Mark McKenna and posted to local reporter Kym Kemp’s website. From there, it quickly went viral, drawing appropriate condemnation from all corners of the country. There’s so much offensive about the sign — its equating enslaved people to dogs, intoning that such people aren’t, in fact, human and comparing a facial covering order designed to prevent the spread of a deadly disease to the institution of slavery, to name a few — that along with social media backlash, questions arose as to whether it was real or had been digitally doctored. The fact-checking website Snopes even ran a story about it, confirming that, yes, it was real and originated right here in Humboldt County.

Some have raised alarm about the way this photo spread, saying the women (two white women posed with the sign, though only one image has spread like virtual wildfire) holding the sign were just exercising their First Amendment rights to free speech and assembly. That’s true. The Bill of Rights does protect someone’s individual right to stand on a street corner with a sign that’s deeply offensive, just as it protects the rights of the rest of us to decry doing so as offensive and racist. We should add that there’s no right to privacy in a public space, so don’t do something on a street corner you don’t want to see on the front page of tomorrow’s newspaper or trending on social media. It’s also been reported that some have called for or threatened physical violence in response to the photo, which obviously is not protected speech.

But make no mistake, this is about much more than a racist sign — this is about white privilege and white exceptionalism. Sure, the layers of privilege and racism, conscious or subconscious, that would prompt someone to make or display a sign like that are breathtaking, but they can also be seen as emblematic of the mindsets driving these protests across the country. Next time you see photos or video of one of these “liberate” protests somewhere in the country, scan the crowd — you won’t see many black or brown faces.

And that’s not a coincidence, as it’s communities of color — along with older populations — that have disproportionately felt the sting of this disease. Preliminary data in Michigan shows that black people, while representing just 14 percent of the population, account for 41 percent of COVID-19 deaths. Similarly, 14 percent of Illinois’ population is black compared to 32.5 percent of its COVID-19 deaths. In New York City, officials reported black and Latino people were twice as likely to die of COVID-19 than their white counterparts. In Louisiana, black people make up 33 percent of the population and 70 percent of COVID-19 deaths.

There are, of course, reasons for these disparate COVID-19 outcomes, and it’s not that the virus itself is racist. Rather, it’s that gross health inequities existed throughout this country long before a new respiratory illness surfaced in China last year. Those inequities are the legacy of hundreds of years of slavery, segregated schools and hospitals and the systemic oppression and exploitation of generations of people, and manifest in everything from reduced access to healthcare and being more likely to live in communities with environmental health hazards to limited access to healthy food and added level of employment stress. (Generational inequities also leave people of color more likely to work in the service sectors where employees are heavily exposed to the virus.)

That’s the context under which groups of mostly white people have taken to streets and the steps of statehouses throughout the country to bemoan the “oppression” of shelter-in-place restrictions and facial covering orders. And it’s the context in which people of color, also experiencing personal and economic impacts, hear protesters shout loudly that their comfort, bank accounts and jobs deserve more consideration than people’s lives.

Make no mistake, history will judge our handling of COVID-19, a generational event. Like all flashpoints, there will be powerful images that tell the story, capturing sentiments of the day. We fear that if officials’ worst predictions of COVID-19 come to pass, McKenna’s photo from in front of the Humboldt County Courthouse will help new generations of Americans understand how a privileged class ignored the collective good and left society’s marginalized and most vulnerable to once again bear unthinkable costs.

Thadeus Greenson is the news editor of the North Coast Journal.

Join the Conversation

11 Comments

  1. “We should add that there’s no right to privacy in a public space”

    Oh really?

    https://www.law.cornell.edu/wex/open_field_doctrine

    A more salient argument would be to note that the dissemination of these images appears to have occurred outside of the sphere of government activities. Individuals who are in public and photographed in public may still have reasonable expectations of privacy which protect their effects and persons from search BY THE STATE, but they have no reasonable expectation that their fellow citizenry will not notice and document their presence.

  2. “Next time you see photos or video of one of these “liberate” protests somewhere in the country, scan the crowd — you won’t see many black or brown faces.”

    LOL

    Yes, because shifty Stenographers have never cropped someone out of a photo whose presence would otherwise undermine the pre-determined narrative. Right guise?

  3. There are, of course, reasons for these disparate COVID-19 outcomes, and it’s not that the virus itself is racist. Rather, (…) gross health inequities existed throughout this country long before a new respiratory illness surfaced in China last year.”

    A decade after Obamacare was instituted and you’re still going on about “systemic inequalities”?

    Disingenuous!

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TOh1I28HbAA

  4. No, Roe. If you do something out in public where everyone can see it is ridiculous to claim an expectation of privacy and no court would disagree. Kinda like claiming red light cameras can’t be used to ticket you for being a menace. You can cherry-pick all you want but this is well established.

  5. as usual, you cant be a white person with out being a spoiled racist. I mean really?

  6. Sharon,
    That’s actually the point. You absolutely can be a white person without being a spoiled racist. Many do it every day. But it takes recognizing there are centuries old inequities and generational wrongs that shape our present. You’re either working to change those or you’re perpetuating them. It’s a choice. As Howard Zinn said, “You can’t be neutral on a moving train.”

  7. Almost like people who choose to smoke cigarettes. The warning is there, the threat is real. Ignorance. Watch BBC news and see all those caskets being buried in mass graves in Brazil and all over the world.

  8. I think folks like to jump on the racist bandwagon. I for one want people to wear masks in public. I do. It just makes sense, even if they are largely ineffective. Even if the good they do is small it is still good. I think the woman with the sign was making a very non racist statement. It didn’t matter what the color of the person the muzzle was on, slavery was reprehensible. She expressed horror at the idea of being forced to wear a mask/muzzle. While I don’t agree, to me, it wasn’t about racism, but coerced behavior.

  9. The Photo Shown is NOT THE REAL PHOTO described in the Text… Why Not Use The Real Photo? Are these People Real in this Photo or is it Created in Photoshop??? A Little Integrity Would be Nice… https://gvan42.blogspot.com/

  10. Gregory-
    No, this is not the real picture. We don’t have rights to the picture, nor did we feel the need to reprint it given its offensive nature.
    Thadeus Greenson

Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *