Editor:

Of all the horrors contained in the cover story “The Soeth Files,” the one that gobsmacked was District Attorney Maggie Fleming’s dismissal of Soeth’s assault on his 6 year old. Her response to the attack: “isolated incidents of parents slapping or spanking their children over their clothes … are generally not considered physical abuse” reveals a cowardly rejection of responsibility.

Soeth had already demonstrated a pattern and practice of abuse in his work. This man hurt his son intentionally, allegedly hitting hard enough to bruise face and buttocks. Bruising is not a product of “slapping or spanking.” Fleming’s use of the creepy “over their clothes” carve-out to shield the abuse from prosecution shows how one steeped in the language of the law can manipulate it.

Prior to reading “The Soeth Files” I believed that the law enforcement system, when faced with behavior as blatantly abusive as Soeth’s, would take corrective action. Now I wonder what would compel the law enforcement protection racket to abandon efforts to keep a lying child abuser on the job? Maybe if his body cam captured him when he was kicking his dog Yahtzee. You know he did.

Sheila Evans, Eureka

Related Stories

The Soeth Files

Local officer’s record includes two shootings, $1.1 million in settlements, mistruths and little accountability

Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *