From left: Eureka Councilmembers Lance Madsen, Linda Atkins and Marian Brady, Mayor Frank Jager and Councilmembers Melinda Ciarabellini and Mike Newman Credit: City of Eureka

In a special meeting Tuesday night, the Eureka City Council will promise to never again do something that it won’t admit to having done in the first place. As it’s phrased in the agenda, the council is scheduled to adopt a resolution “of unconditional commitment to cease, desist, and not repeat past action that is alleged to have violated the Brown Act.”

This grammatically dubious promise stems from a very strange July 16 meeting of the Mayors City Select Committee of the North Coast Railroad Authority. At said meeting, Eureka City Councilmember Mike Newman, acting as mayor pro tem, voted with the majority to boot rail pragmatist Alex Stillman from the NCRA board and replace her with choo-choo fantasist Fortuna Mayor Doug Strehl.

During the meeting and in subsequent interviews, Newman said the Eureka City Council had discussed the issue and guided his vote. Specifically he said, “Our council was in discussion, and we were behind the appointment of Doug Strehl … . [T]he majority of the council was in agreement with, um, having Doug.”

Trouble is, there was no public discussion of the matter at any public meetings of the Eureka City Council. (California’s Brown Act states that public business must be done in public.) Asked later for an explanation, Newman changed his story, then changed it again — first saying that Jager had spoken to each councilmember individually and then, after being reminded that that, too, would violate the Brown Act, saying Jager, who’d previously voted for Stillman, simply changed his mind and sent Newman in his stead to save face. Fellow Councilmember Linda Atkins even speculated that the council may have violated the Brown Act.

Regardless, tomorrow night, the council will promise to never again do whatever anyone might think they did to violate the Brown Act. The resolution comes in response to a legal claim filed by Eureka resident Dale Preston, and according to the Times-Standard, the linguistic dodge will “allow the council to avoid litigation without admitting wrongdoing.”

Neat trick.

Note: This post has been updated to clarify Newman’s role as mayor pro tem.

Ryan Burns worked for the Journal from 2008 to 2013, covering a diverse mix of North Coast subjects,...

Join the Conversation

6 Comments

  1. they should add at the end of the non-apology something like, “nothing will ever be good enough for the haters who consider themselves the arbiters of good and evil.” It worked so well for Dan Johnson!

  2. Blog post?? This should be front page news, it’s far more informative than the Times Standard coverage!

  3. That HCAOG meeting, in which Mike Newman popped in in place of our Mayor was the saddest public spectacle I have ever witnessed.

  4. I don’t know Joel, the viral video of his interview at his election victory party where he can only repeat the word “business” takes a lot of the shock out of his subsequent sad spectacles.

  5. Wouldn’t it be great if we had public-interest media willing to showcase Mayor Jagger and Council-member Newman’s “switcheroo” next to Jagger’s televised debate where he emphasizes that he, “has no agenda”?

    Maybe more people would start to vote.

Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *