[UPDATED 11/1: See Treasurer/Tax Collector information below.]PayDay

Many Humboldt County employees made more money last year than the stated maximum salaries for their positions, including several workers whose incomes were more than twice the amounts listed for their job titles, according to newly released information from the State Controller’s Office.

Thanks to a salary scandal in the City of Bell, Controller John Chiang this week unveiled a website that lists the salaries, pension benefits and other compensation for more than 594,000 city and county employees throughout California. Chiang noted the importance of public scrutiny, saying that, “The absence of transparency and accountability invites corruption, self-dealing and the abuse of public funds.”

A search of Humboldt reveals that more than 70 county employees earned six-figure incomes last year, with the top wage-earner — a physician/psychiatrist working in the Mental Health Department — hauling in nearly a quarter of a million dollars ($246,255). Three physician/psychiatrists ended up making more last year than the director of the Health and Human Services Department, Phillip Crandall. Nevertheless, Crandall’s 2009 salary somehow exceeded $215,000 despite the fact that his position’s maximum annual salary is listed as $161,692 — a difference of more than 50 grand.

And Crandall wasn’t alone. The county’s 2009 personnel director, Rick Haeg, earned $208,142, which exceeds that position’s stated max by more than $90,000. An information technology analyst somehow doubled his/her stated salary max of $70,515, taking in a total of $143,597 in 2009. And three deputy sheriffs managed the same feat — each earning in excess of $111,000 when their annual salary max is less than half that amount: $55,780.

Asked how public employees can earn more than their theoretical maximum salaries, County Administrative Officer Phillip Smith-Hanes said there can be a number of contributing factors. For example, he said, when an employee retires (as was the case with Haeg last year), he or she collects unused vacation time and may receive other deferred compensation. Employees in law enforcement and nursing can earn incentives for overtime, shift differentials (ie. working the night shift) and professional certificates. And many positions reward longevity, Smith-Hanes said.

Sheriff’s Office Public Information Officer Brenda Godsey echoed those statements, saying the three eyebrow-raising salaries for deputy sheriffs last year likely represent payouts for retirees.

The reported numbers also shed a light on rising pension costs. One hundred seventeen county employees received $10,000 or more from the county in pension benefits last year with hundreds more employees in the four-digit range.

The salaries of county supervisors have been the subject of controversy this year, with the Grand Jury recommending a salary reduction in April. The report lists the supes’ 2009 salaries ranging from $71,437 to $85,078. (Names are not attached to any of the salaries in the report.) Shockingly, the maximum listed salary for a Humboldt County Supervisor, according to the report, is $150,291. Smith-Hanes said that was a mistake; the actual max is $81,576.

Some other county employee incomes of note:

  • District Attorney Paul Gallegos — $147,794 (listed salary max, $150,291)

  • An employment/training manager — $144,625 (listed salary max, $85,230)

  • Sheriff Gary Philp — $130,559 (max, $150,291)

  • Public Works Director Tom Mattson — $129,367 (max, $117,044)

  • Assistant District Attorney Wes Keat — $124,903 (max, $113,256)

  • Auditor/Controller Michael Giacone — $119,909 (max, $150,291)

  • Treasurer/Tax Collector Stephen Strawn John Bartholomew — $118,869 (max, $150,291) [John Bartholomew took over from Strawn on May 25, then won the June 8 election to serve the next term. His current salary is $111,128.]

  • Assessor Linda Hill — $117,178 (max, $150,291)

  • Recorder Carolyn Crnich — $117,178 (max, $150,291)

Ryan Burns worked for the Journal from 2008 to 2013, covering a diverse mix of North Coast subjects,...

Join the Conversation

17 Comments

  1. So one couldn’t actually hold the board of supervisors accountable for county paying out wages like $246,255 to s mental health professional right…? One couldn’t hold Public Works Director accountable, hell, he runs the airport and we all know how accountable they have been… who can one hold accountable in government these days?

    Funny question… obviously we should all work for the government.

  2. Funny too how there are 5 supervisors and somehow some make more or less than others. Seems problematic.

  3. Kate, you should read last years Grand Jury report on saleries. “Problematic” would just be the tip of the iceberg.

  4. “… a physician/psychiatrist working in the Mental Health Department — hauling in nearly a quarter of a million dollars…”

    WTF?!

  5. I believe Humboldt County is some sort of hot spot in mental health research. It was in the papers some years ago. It would only make sense that with the number of facilities and cases, the isolated area etc. make it ideal. The employee in question probably ranks very high nationally among prestigious people in the same position. Not saying there’s anything wrong with this.

  6. For example, a typical cardiologist in private practice makes around $320,000 per year, a psychiatrist $190,000….

    right, ok, let me dig up my civics class book, what chapter does it state that public should be competitive with private industries?

    top heavy comes to mind, considering a number of people I know that work in that department dont make more than 30-40k.

  7. My question is why don’t most of them make the maximum? Isn’t the implication that you make your “Max” when you work your full 40 hours per week?

    Put another way, if you make less than your max are you working half or quarter time? What are the minimum hours and minimum compensation? Can you work 20 hours a week and 30 weeks a year for 80% pay?

    Not stating, just curious.

    And I believe they save up the overtime and deferred benefits and then retire because with CALPERS they get 2-3% per year served of the highest paying year in retirement.

    So if you normally earn $55K, but make $100 your final year after 30 years, you collect 60% of 100K for life, or $60K.

    Good work if you can get it.

  8. I think the min and max thing is just a pay scale. So you start out at the min and work your way up. I don’t think it has anything to do with hours per week. It’s merit increases.

  9. There’s a lot of misunderstanding about state pensions. There are a number of different pension schemes that have been developed by the state and administered through CALPERS.

    The schemes are 1.25% @ 65, 2% @ 60, 2% @ 55, 2.5% @ 55, 3% @ 50, 3% @ 55. What this means is that the employee gets that % of their average monthly pay rate for their last 12 (or 36) months of employment times number of years of service.

    For example, a person covered under 2% @ 60 who’d worked for 30 years, and who retired at 60 would get 2%*30 yr = 60% of their last year’s monthly average income (or last 3 yr average , depends on how it was bargained) as their monthly pension.

    The richest pensions (3%@50, 3%@55, 2.5%@55) are reserved for safety employees — police, fire, highway patrol, prison guards.

    Executives and administrators (naturally, they make the rules) typically get 2% @ 55. Most state employees get 2% @ 60 or 1.25% @ 65.

    There’s a belief that employees contribute nothing to the system, that it’s all taxpayer gravy. Not true — for example, a CSU faculty member pays 5% of their monthly salary into the pension system. (This % may vary among agencies, and among job classifications — it’s negotiated, or specified by the legislature or executive agencies).

    Some useful figures:

    Average CALPERS service pension: $2,188/month

    78% of CALPERS service retirees get less than $36,000/year

    CALPERS has done an excellent job of long-term investing, getting good returns. About 60% of the payout to retirees comes from investment income. The remainder comes from employee and employer (state, agency) contributions.

    IN YEARS WHEN THE INVESTMENT RETURNS ARE SUFFICIENTLY HIGH, THE STATE AND OTHER AGENCIES MAKE NO PENSION CONTRIBUTIONS AT ALL. The employees always do, however. In years with bad returns, the state/agency contribution goes up.

    Most people who work for the state don’t expect salaries as large as in the private sector. For example, one person that I know was working for an engineering consulting firm for about $100,000/yr, with medical & pension benefits on top. But he really wanted to teach. He was hired by HSU eight years ago at $55,000 yr; today he makes about $65,000/yr. He took about a 45% pay cut to work for the state. The long-term pension benefits help make state employment attractive to such qualified folks.

  10. and the Mayor gets $ 650 dollars a month . Council gets $ 550 a month and so you wonder why we got Marshall Spalding a drug pusher running for Mayor . A guy that spends more time at , dave’s Bar than he does for Mayor and a drunk who boasts of his commitment to Alcoholic beverages running for Council . I think , Larry a Pot head is the only one that makes sense .
    It’s time we increase our elected officials a living wage then maybe we’ll get some better candidates .

  11. ……..it should of read as follows ; A former Mayor that spent more time at Dave’s bar than time spent as Mayor & an apparent drunk running for Council who boasts of his committment to beer . Larry a Pothead is the only one that makes sense .

  12. Sorry , guess i got brain problems & just to make it clear i was not referring to Mr. Kuhnel who is one of the best people we could get for the job but equally so is , Xandra whom i feel is just as good .
    I truly don’t know if Larry is a Pothead & i care less . I just know he’s well qualified & has tried hard to make , Eureka a good place for everybody .
    May the best person win !

  13. I think with all this publicity and a grand jury investigation, nothing will change. Public officials are unaccountable. I’d like to hear some suggestiions on how voters can be heard.
    Phillip Crandall is the worst public official as far as grabbing money and power. He gets the lion’s share of the county budget but seems unaccountable and gets whatever he wants.
    I would like to follow the money sometime, especially Mental Health Services Act monies that seem to be used for everything but mental health services.
    No accountability!

Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *