|

COVER STORY | IN THE NEWS | STAGE MATTERS
TALK OF THE TABLE | THE HUM | CALENDAR
February 16, 2006

A Life in the Theater
by WILLIAM
S. KOWINSKI
In my sixth column (with hardly a negative word
in the previous five) and after glowing notices of four shows,
last week I wrote what I frankly dreaded: a negative review.
I wasn't bothered by the prospect of letters to
the editor (though I recall none for the "positive"
pieces). I had my say here, and others have theirs in the letters
section. The dialogue is part of the point.
But I know how hard people work to create theater.
I've been involved in it since my third grade class put on the
first play I wrote. In fourth grade I had my first and only rep
company, when I wrote scripts for my Cub Scout den, and we blew
away the other dens and their knot-tying demonstrations for the
Pack prize every month. I wrote, acted and directed in college,
and I've seen my scripts produced occasionally since. I've been
a dramaturge and otherwise involved as a participant or close
observer of professional, college and community productions.
I love the process. So I wasn't looking forward to the inevitable
hurt feelings.
Besides, Charlie can say anything he wants about
films in his column, but Steve Martin doesn't live here.
I also know that producers, directors and actors
on the North Coast, as elsewhere, themselves make qualitative
judgments, which can be quite harsh. They just don't often make
them in public, and sign their names. Judgments are part of the
process. Dealing with them is part of the job.
Some may feel that community theater should essentially
be immune from criticism, but those theaters still charge admission
and ask for contributions. Evaluation is a reasonable element,
as it is for the artistic growth of the theaters themselves.
Producers know that they are competing for audience with other
entertainment, including available versions of the plays they're
producing, just as theater artists learn from excellent productions,
and are inspired by them.
As for my credentials, I offer this additional
information: Like a lot of small town working class or lower-middle
class kids, I didn't see live theater as a child, but I've since
seen hundreds of plays in at least 15 different cities and towns,
from the back of New York restaurants to Broadway, and from the
Guthrie in Minneapolis to summer barn theater in central Pennsylvania,
and at the Changing Scene in Denver, which was down an alley
past a dumpster and an old washing machine.
That's in addition to plays at all North Coast
venues in the past nine years. Although I've written on theater
for three newspapers and several national magazines, most of
the time nobody was paying me to go. These gigs did provide the
opportunity to talk at length with Jason Robards Jr., August
Wilson and many younger theater professionals.
But that doesn't mean I'm the expert, or I can't
be wrong. Responses are individual. What I say doesn't prevent
anyone from going to a show, nor should it deter anyone from
feeling justified in enjoying it. But if I'm not honest, what's
the point?
Other things being equal, I'd rather not write
about something I don't like. That's not always possible, and
in last week's case I felt strongly about the play itself. I've
seen Shakespeare's plays at every level and every sort of venue
they're performed, up to and including Kevin Kline as Hamlet,
and Glenda Jackson as Lady Macbeth. I don't expect New York or
regional theater gloss at a community theater. I am also dismayed
by seeing a production there I'd expect to see in a high school,
where the purpose is quite different.
I don't believe, as some do, that community theaters
aren't capable of doing decent Shakespeare. But these plays probably
require more time, attention and directed energies than other
productions, and the best actors and directors in the community.
The community deserves this. Great plays are great opportunities.
In my columns here so far, I've deliberately highlighted
the particular pleasures of live performance, and of the process
of creating it. My subtext has been that in addition to movies,
music and other forms of art and entertainment, stage matters.
My hope is to encourage a thriving theater community.
But healthy theater requires self-criticism and self-analysis,
and ever-greater aspiration. My contribution is to add information
and context, and describe my responses. All I'm finally doing
is adding to the discussion, while providing something I hope
is worth reading. I feel a responsibility to the community and
to the participants, but also to my editors, readers and to the
plays themselves, and the life and future of the theater. I try
to balance those responsibilities.
Correction to a factual error in last week's column:
The performance of As You Like It I attended last Friday
was not its official opening night, which for this play was Thursday
(whereas for the last NCRT production, the Thursday production
I saw was apparently a preview, and Friday the official opening.)
My response was so strong that it was unlikely to be changed
by a more enthusiastic audience of families and friends, or another
hour or two of misery. I might also point out that since I wrote
about the production as a whole, I mentioned no names.

COVER STORY | IN
THE NEWS | STAGE
MATTERS
TALK OF THE TABLE | THE HUM | CALENDAR
Comments? Write
a letter!

© Copyright 2006, North Coast Journal,
Inc.
|