March 3, 2005
IN
THE NEWS | PUBLISHER | STAGE DOOR
PREVIEW
| THE HUM | CALENDAR
On the cover:
District Attorney Paul Gallegos
by EMILY GURNON
A
YEAR AGO, HE WAS RIDING HIGH. ON THE NIGHT OF MARCH 2, 2004,
DISTRICT ATTORNEY Paul Gallegos was the center of attention at
the packed Lost Coast Brewery, celebrating his landslide victory
over those who tried to boot him from office in a recall election.
The message was clear, Gallegos told the adoring crowd, "that
if we work and sacrifice for democracy, it will work and sacrifice
for us."
They were stirring words for
his supporters, who saw the victory as a repudiation of good-ol'-boy
politics in Humboldt County. Gallegos, a biblical David, had
gone up against the Goliath of the Pacific Lumber Co. -- the
company he had sued for fraud
and the one that provided some 80 percent of the funding for
the recall -- and vanquished it. It was nothing less than the
beginning of a new era.
But the feeling of jubilation
was not shared by many of Gallegos' colleagues and staff. Today,
the affable 42-year-old DA is struggling to manage a massive
workload in his office, caused, in part, by his own doing. He
consistently skips important meetings, and is out of touch with
colleagues and community groups, critics say. And some of the
public statements he made during the recall campaign continue
to trouble those whose trust he lost.
"I can't say that he hasn't tried,"
said Eureka Police Capt. Murl Harpham [photo at left] ,
a 48-year veteran of the force. "We have a good relationship
in terms of communicating. The problem is things are not getting
done. It hurts our morale, it hurts our ability to do the job."
`Tuned and buffed'
In some ways, Gallegos said,
the recall was positive. "It was a good thing because it
was an exercise in our values," he said late one recent
Friday afternoon in his office's law library. But the divisive
campaign also was a major diversion from the job he began in
January 2003 after working nine years as a local defense attorney.
"When it was over, it was
like, I can get to work. I've been working to do that, to get
the office tuned and buffed. The first thing is to turn us into
a team. I think we're getting there."
But the ranks of his team have
thinned considerably in two years. Gallegos has lost a significant
number of his deputy district attorneys, the lawyers who go to
court to prosecute Humboldt County's alleged murderers, rapists,
drug dealers and petty thieves. Rob Wade and Ed Borg resigned
in late summer for jobs in other counties. Nandor Vadas was laid
off because a domestic violence grant that funded his position
ran out. Harry Kassahkian and Gloria Albin Sheets were laid off.
(Sheets later ran as a replacement candidate in the recall and
has sued the office for discrimination, claiming she was let
go in connection with a workers' compensation claim. The suit
is pending.) And, in June, Gallegos fired Allison Jackson.
The loss of Wade, Vadas and
Jackson -- all veteran felony prosecutors -- was a crushing blow
to the office, observers say. The remaining veterans, Max Cardoza,
Worth Dikeman and Maggie Fleming (who only works part-time),
are left to shoulder the vast majority of the most serious criminal
cases.
Gallegos has chosen not to replace
Wade and Jackson with similarly experienced attorneys for budget
reasons. Instead, he's hired two recent law school graduates
to deal with misdemeanors, the less serious crimes. A third will
be hired soon. All must be trained before they set foot in the
courtroom. (Other vacancies will not be filled.)
"You try to do the job
in a cost-effective way," Gallegos said. "So one of
the things we wanted to do is to have misdemeanor attorneys do
misdemeanor caseloads, but also support felony deputies. It reduces
the felony deputies' caseload, so I don't need as many of them,
also my staff is less expensive.
"Could we use more people?
Absolutely. Could we use more felony attorneys? Yeah. Times aren't
as plush as they were in the past. But I certainly hope this
office is fulfilling its obligation, and I believe it is."
Gallegos is taking on some of
the load by trying cases in court himself, fulfilling a campaign
pledge. He's also getting some additional support for the Palco
fraud suit from Steve Schectman, who was officially deputized
as an unpaid prosecutor to assist Assistant District Attorney
Tim Stoen on the case.
Gallegos won't comment on why
he fired Jackson, except to say that he does not regret doing
so. Jackson, who got a job doing civil law for the Harland firm
in Eureka, declined to be interviewed for this story, as did
Wade, Cardoza and Fleming.
As Gallegos continued to talk
about the workload, his tone became more serious.
"Are we pushing the office
to the point of breaking it?" he said. "Yeah, I think
so."
Ripple effects
Others, too, have felt the loss
of staff in the DA's office. Jackson and Wade, along with Andrew
Isaac, were the deputies who handled nearly all of the sexual
assault and child abuse cases in the county -- cases that are
complicated to investigate and often difficult to prosecute,
said Maryann Hayes-Mariani, one of the managers at the North
Coast Rape Crisis Team in Eureka.
The departure of Jackson and
Wade was an "incredible, monumental" blow, Hayes-Mariani
said. "If your focus day in and day out is to prosecute
cases where people are hurting people in these horrendous ways,
when you're used to having staff that have an incredible amount
of experience doing this work, and they can support each other,
it's just helpful," she said. "They were very excellent
at their jobs, and that we no longer have them is a great void
for this community."
The staff shortage has caused
another problem, Hayes-Mariani said. Cases that used to be handled
from beginning to end with one prosecutor may now be shuttled
among several -- with the victim of the crime completely in the
dark as to whom to contact about their case.
"The survivor starts feeling
frustrated by the system, and if something happens that they
weren't made aware of, they end up feeling re-victimized,"
she said, "lost in the system."
Gallegos said he is simply too
short-staffed to always have one deputy stick with a case from
beginning to end. "If I had the people, we'd do it absolutely,"
he said. But "if a judge says that [a particular] case has
to be tried, it gets tried by someone. To me, you get the job
done."
Law enforcement also feels the
pain when prosecutors are up to their eyeballs in work.
"There's just not enough
attorneys to review the cases and try the cases," said Dave
Walker, a former investigator in the DA's office who now works
part-time as a Sheriff's Office investigator. In many instances,
he said, charges are never brought against suspects. "That's
one of the ways that you really discourage your rank and file
guys," he said. "It's really subtle. It's a partnership.
The police enforce the law and they have the expectation that
many of [the suspects] are going to be prosecuted. I think most
of the working police officers I know are just gritting their
teeth and waiting to see what happens in the next election."
Police Chief Dave Douglas did
not return phone calls seeking comment. Humboldt County Sheriff
Gary Philp declined to be interviewed.
"I'm not trying to say
it's all his fault," Walker continued. "He's got a
pretty tough row to hoe."
But Gallegos does not have a
law enforcement background, and the police have never trusted
him. They still chafe at the memory of one of Gallegos' early
comments: that he would not be "buddies" with the cops.
(He is a servant of the community and cannot afford to get too
close to anyone, he says.)
"You don't have to be buddies,"
Walker said. "But you have to have a pretty cordial relationship
with them and understand what they're trying to do. He's had
a pretty good swing at it and he still hasn't done it. If he
hasn't done it by now, it's not going to happen."
The Stoen factor
The presence in the District
Attorney's Office of Tim Stoen
[photo at left], Gallegos' right
hand man, continues to be a sore subject among some of his colleagues,
according to members of the legal community who asked to remain
anonymous. Stoen, whom some consider rather an odd duck, was
recruited by Gallegos from Mendocino County. Though he does work
on some criminal cases, much of his time in the last two years
has been spent on one civil case: the fraud suit against Pacific
Lumber. That may be a hard pill to swallow for those who see
criminal cases as more pressing. For Gallegos, it's not an either-or
situation.
"Part of what my responsibility
is is to file civil lawsuits [as well as criminal cases],"
he said. "The people of the state of California and of this
community want us to create social justice as well. If someone's
committing fraud, be it someone selling cars out here and doing
bait-and-switches, or whatever it is, and it falls under the
Unfair Business Practices Act, prosecute them."
Of course, some of the animus
against Stoen may have to do with the Palco case. For many longtime
Humboldt residents, the fact that the county is "going after"
one of its biggest and oldest employers is incomprehensible.
Stoen knows that he has been
something of a lightning rod for criticism of the office, and
he takes it in stride.
"People have told me that
I have a big target on my back," he said. "I'm happy
when the papers go after me rather than Paul, because the job
of a loyal No. 2 is to take those arrows. If I can take some
of the heat off Paul, I'm happy to do it."
Stoen says he thinks things
are running much more smoothly in the office than they were a
year ago. The recall "cleared the air, and established Paul
as being in charge," he said. "He has this gift of
being able to transcend the personal attacks and personal grievances
and concentrate on the job that needs to be done. The focus really
is to protect public safety and make this ship run smoothly.
I think he's doing an excellent job as a manager and administrator,
since it's new to him."
Forging ahead
Deputy District Attorney Wes
Keat's job is to take all of the reports that come in to the
DA's office from the various police agencies and make formal
charges against crime suspects.
Though the office has been trying
to cope with a very high volume of cases and a shortage of attorneys,
things are going better lately, said Keat, a former Riverside
police officer who joined the DA's office in 1994.
"Obviously, [Gallegos]
has made some choices which impact that, but the problem is not
of his making. It's a financial problem," Keat said. "We
teach young lawyers the trade and then they go somewhere where
they can make a lot more money. We're very much at the bottom
end" of the DA pay scale in California.
The ones who stay, he said,
are truly dedicated. "What it really means is that the office
is full of people for whom money is no object. They believe in
it. If we were after money, we wouldn't be here."
Gallegos is "very much
different" than former District Attorney Terry Farmer, Keat
said, but he's doing a fine job. "He approaches his job
differently and he does different stuff," like trying cases
himself. "Terry didn't do that very much. Paul, I think,
sees himself more as providing the leadership, and he leaves
some of the smaller trivial administrative details to other people,
such as myself. He's a trial lawyer. He goes to court, he tries
cases."
Deputy District Attorney Worth
Dikeman, who ran as a replacement candidate in the recall election,
said Gallegos has been fairly effective as a trial lawyer. Asked
how effective he is as a manager, Dikeman said, "I think
that's a question you should ask Paul."
The best candidate?
Some of his colleagues clearly
give Gallegos credit for going into the courtroom. Others say
the job of managing his office is monumental enough and he shouldn't
be trying cases on top of everything else.
Being a county department head
means going to meetings: keeping abreast of overall budget issues,
being in touch with other departments and community groups, forging
good communications. On this score, some say, Gallegos is falling
short.
Christina Allbright [photo at right] has
been an attorney for 14 years with the county Public Defender's
Office. She said Gallegos is a friend, she likes his politics
and she supported him strongly in the recall. But when it comes
to representing his office, she said, Gallegos is a no-show.
"He just can't make it
to meetings or send a representative, and he's a critical player,"
Allbright said. "And I know that that's a concern of different
community groups."
Records of monthly county department
head meetings reveal that Gallegos has attended twice in the
last year.
Allbright said she has talked
with Gallegos about her misgivings. And she has talked with others
about whether there might be a better person for the job. "I'm
concerned that he may not be the best candidate in the future."
Gallegos said he attends many
meetings each week, but that "getting cases tried and making
this office work is my first responsibility, I think."
There is no clear indication
who might run against him.
When Dikeman ran as a replacement
candidate in the recall, he said throughout the campaign that
he was "not running against Paul." He threw his name
in the ring when Steve Schectman, a civil attorney with no prosecutorial
experience, said he would run in support of Gallegos. Dikeman
was determined to keep Schectman out should the recall succeed.
Later, he voted in favor of
the recall, and said on election night that there were certain
things that had "troubled" him about his boss's conduct.
One example: Gallegos' public
statements on his handling of the case of Pedro Martinez-Hernandez,
a 39-year-old Ferndale man accused of continually molesting a
minor for eight years. The initial charge against Martinez-Hernandez,
assigned by Keat as the charging deputy, was one count of "continuous
sexual abuse." But Keat also wrote that there were probably
many, many sex offense counts that could give the defendant 100
years in prison, and Gallegos' critics said he eventually got
additional information that justified multiple charges. Still,
Gallegos -- who was handling the case in court and could have
amended the charges -- allowed the man to plead guilty in January
2004 to the single count.
When critics blasted Gallegos
about the incident, his response was to say that Keat made the
charging decisions, not him.
Dikeman said last year that
"there was an effort to cover it up," and that "misinformation
was released." He did not elaborate, but others have gone
further, saying that Gallegos either had not read the file or
had misread it. Basically, they say, he screwed up and would
not admit it. Worse, he put the blame on Keat.
Gallegos maintains, as he has
all along, that it was a "righteous charging decision,"
and that the fact that Martinez-Hernandez got 16 years in prison
was "not a bad resolution of that case.
"The thing I regret is
that some people thought I was trying to pony it off on Wes Keat,"
he said. "I accept that criticism. But it wasn't my intention
to cast blame."
Asked whether he would run
against Gallegos next year, Dikeman said, "I have not eliminated
that possibility yet. Of course, the last election demonstrated
that he is a very skillful politician who is capable of generating
large amounts of cash." (The Friends of Paul Gallegos raised
about $300,000, mostly in small donations, in the recall fight.
On the pro-recall side, Pacific Lumber alone contributed more
than $313,000 in cash and nonmonetary donations.) And Gallegos
has a large following, Dikeman said. "All of those things
go into the mix." Meanwhile, his aging Subaru still sports
a "Worth Dikeman" bumper sticker from the recall campaign.
Richard Salzman was the campaign
manager for No on F, the anti-recall effort. He said the group
managed to put together an "infrastructure and environment
that encouraged grassroots participation," and thousands
joined in: donating money, phone banking, distributing lawn signs.
"Ultimately, our success was due to the cause itself,"
he said, "and to the candidate."
Still, there was considerable
outrage generated by the fact that Pacific Lumber was bankrolling
the recall effort. The next election won't have that element.
"We'll have a greater challenge to raise money this time
around," Salzman said.
As to who might run against
Gallegos, Salzman said the ideal candidate "probably will
need to be from out of the area," although she or he would
qualify only after relocating here, of course. Dikeman might
run, but "I don't see how you can be an opponent of your
boss and still work in the office."
Gallegos himself said he has
"every intention" of running for office again when
his seat comes up in June 2006. "I still have work to do.
I like this job," he said. He called the rumor that he might
instead run for judge "ridiculous." (Judges Dale Reinholtsen
and Timothy Cissna will be up for re-election next year.)
If he had the last year to do
over again, would he change anything?
Small stuff? Sure, he said.
Big things, fundamental decisions? "Probably not,"
he said. "I'm just not one of those kind of people who sit
around and think about how to redo life. I don't."
Photo above left:
Mosaic mural at Humboldt County courthouse
SEE ALSO:
Feb. 19, 2004 COVER STORY: "Just another day...
Shadowing Paul Gallegos"
Feb. 26, 2004: COVER STORY - "The three who
would be D.A."
March 4, 2004 NEWS STORY: "Jubilation at the
brewery: hundreds celebrate the DA's easy victory "
May 1, 2003 NEWS STORY: "Declaring war: The
bid to recall DA Paul Gallegos has begun"
July 31, 2003: COVER STORY - "Standing in
the Shadows of Jonestown: Assistant District Attorney Tim Stoen"
IN
THE NEWS | PUBLISHER | STAGE DOOR
PREVIEW
| THE HUM | CALENDAR
Comments? Write a
letter!
© Copyright 2005, North Coast Journal,
Inc.
|