This week, we’re delighted to run our friend Kym Kemp‘s sober and insightful essay about how Humboldt County should prepare for the inevitable legalization of marijuana in California and elsewhere. Her story hits newsstands just as the national media — The New York Times, the Associated Press, National Public Radio and others — picks up on a forum on the same subject that was being held at the Mateel Community Center in Redway as this issue was going to bed. On Kemp’s behalf, we hope that it will contribute some useful ideas to a discussion that is only just getting underway here in weed country.
It’s going to take a mountain of work to get some members of the local business community on board. For 40-odd years, local government and most of the county’s movers and shakers have devoted immense effort into squashing the demon weed. Very soon, we will devote immense effort to promote it. This won’t be an easy mental turn for some people to make, and there’s a chance that internal dissent amongst the business community could hold back the very forward-thinking conversations that are starting to form around the issue. Marijuana has been falsely painted as a moral issue for so long that some will resist salvaging the scraps of our immense black market economy through sensible and creative means like those that Kemp and others are suggesting. They’re not bad people, and so they will not wish to promote what they have long thought of as evil or antisocial.
This it understandable, if false, and it is to be hoped that the retro-moralists among us don’t get much traction, as the county’s economic well-being absolutely depends on a smooth and quick transition between prohibition and repeal. We stand to lose almost all of our region’s largest export product, one that accounts for at least as high a percentage of our economy as timber did in the old days. As Kemp rightly notes, this will affect the bottom line of every single person in our county — every merchant, every professional, every schoolteacher and policeman and government worker. The moment that marijuana legalizes, the bubble that prohibition has created will be burst, and unless Humboldt County is smart it will hit us far more deeply than the collapse of the nation’s financial sector did a year and a half ago.
Here’s the good news: “Humboldt County” means something in the world at large, and many smart business people have already subtly capitalized on that fact. Arcata’s world-renowned Cypress Grove Chevre counts, in its line of high-end cheeses such brands as “Humboldt Fog” and “Purple Haze.” Humboldt Brews sells a “Hemp Ale,” along with a line of leaf-bedecked T-shirts promoting that particular brew. The entrepreneurs behind these and similar lines of product are doing us all a favor — not only in bringing home the dollars, but by showing us clever, playful ways to promote our county. We’re going to need them.
Why is marijuana prohibition doomed? Because the citizens of the state of California especially, and soon of the nation at large, are tired of wasting their tax dollars on a drug war whose only success has been (and ever will be) to prop up prices and make outlaws rich. Because just about everyone in this state under the age of 50 has smoked marijuana at one time or another, and so they know that it is physically far less dangerous than tobacco or alcohol and only rarely addictive in the way that those legal drugs are. Because it is child’s play to point to eminent scientists, artists, captains of industry — even Governors of California and Presidents of the United States — who have had or continue to have their brushes with weed, and seem to have survived the encounter with little damage. Because state after state and country after country are realizing all this, and are starting to loosen up about it. Locally, because the citizens of Humboldt County are tired of the waste of resources involved in the “grow house” phenomenon, and because we’re sick of the money-hungry yahoos who get into shootouts on the streets every couple of months or so.
Legalization will be on the November 2010 ballot, and what with the state budget crisis and the general gestalt, we’re betting that it’s going to pass. We’re going to be poorer, and unless people in power start joining the efforts that Anna Hamilton and others are making we’re going to be a lot poorer. But we’ll all live more sanely and honorably. Stack that against the petty fear of a minor intoxicant, and then ask yourself which is the better way to go.
This article appears in Welcome to Pot City!.

Hank,
It would be nice if our elected officials and leaders of this community worried less about making this a better place to raise drugs and more about making it a better place to raise children.
The argument of not being able to do anything about it is silly. Just start seizing property. Cars, houses and land. There wouldn’t be a drug problem around here in 90 days.
I truly don’t understand why you so completely dismiss the message an open drug society gives to the kids around here. We have a responsibility as adults andmaking it harder on a young couple to raise their kids for the sake of getting high on the plaza isn’t exactly forward thinking. I expect a follow up issue is forthcoming with interviews from social workers, law enforcement, hospital staff, teachers, and parent groups on the other side of legalization?
The liberal Humboldt utopian dream of a whacked out population contemplating cloud formations may be popular out on the HSU quad, but I doubt they vote in any great numbers.
I assume the brochure touted in the issue were satire. I can’t imagine anyone truly wanting to make a laughing stock out of the county.
Tom Fredriksen
Eureka
http://redwoodcp.wordpress.com
I used the plaza and its inhabitants as a successful, at least up till the writing of this note, anti-drug message for my children, but its like fighting the tide.
I can’t imagine anyone truly wanting to make a laughing stock out of the county.
Let me be the umpteenth person to note:
That ship sailed long ago.
I agree with Hank Sims comments, but I seriously doubt that the state will vote for legalization. If we couldn’t get it together to vote for gay marriage, why would we do so for legalization?
Tom,
You think that with 90 days you can win a drug war that has been failing for 80 years or so? You’re going to succeed where a long line of eminences, starting with J. Edgar Hoover, have failed?
I’m skeptical.
My point isn’t so much whether or not we should continue fighting the war on weed. My point is that the war is already lost. I’m saying that marijuana should be legalized, but more importantly I’m saying that it will be legalized.
What are we going to do about it? Would you prefer that we suffer silently, or would you prefer that we get down to business? You’re pro-business, right? I, for one, could care less about being a "laughing stock," but I understand that it would sting you a bit more because it’s your people that would be doing the laughing. Really, though — big deal. I laugh at Branson, Mo. I’m hardly the only one. Doesn’t seem to have changed their business model.
Finally: I am both a father of young children and a cigarette smoker. I know, beyond any doubt, that my children will smoke weed at some point in their lives, regardless of what I might have to say about it. I hope and pray that I’ll have some sort of influence when the time comes around, but I know that it’ll be like trying to steer an ocean liner by dangling a kayak paddle over the side.
But to tell the truth, I’m guessing weed isn’t going to be my first priority when things get to that stage. I’m also going to have to worry about drinking and driving. Unprotected sex. Tobacco. The things that will actually kill them, rather than just make them feel goofy for a few hours.
Hank,
I’m going to expand on my remarks as well.
The war on drugs hasn’t been lost, it has never been fought. The county District Attorney could begin seizing vehicles, houses rented for the purpose of drug use as well as private land used for drug production….pot or meth, take your pick.
He chooses not to. The local law enforcement agencies choose not to. The local newspapers fail to hold them accountable for enforcing the laws. Unless of course it is a law they agree with.
Follow the money, make it more expensive than it is worth and this explosion of drugs in our community will be gone in 90 days. It would solve our city / county financial mess as well. Great income opportunity and given the choice between the slum houses off of Wabash and the Zoo staying open…..I’ll take the Zoo.
Second, as to my point of our responsibility as adults in the community.
Like you I could care less about some floater on the plaza. Weak people have always been drawn to intoxicants and always will. What is behind this legalization is mainstreaming.
I akin it to the gold rush days. Very few minors made a dime during the gold rush. The money and fortunes were made by the merchants selling them the gold pans.
Lets not pretend it is otherwise here in Humboldt. I use as an example the plethora of ad space sold surrounding the extensive article in this weeks glorification of drugs manifesto. The drug merchant lobby is well entrenched and rubbing their hands together using the kids and poor people of this community. A financial stake in their continued and expanded drug use. Not opinion, observable fact.
I just think it is hard enough for a parent to raise their kids these days. For all of the reasons you mentioned. I believe that we shouldn’t be making it harder on them.
The same liberals who won’t let a soda machine anywhere near a school, or let the kids play dodge ball are now telling us that making marijuana mainstream and even more available is a wonderful thing.
Maybe if I smoked pot it would make sense to me.
Sorry, but I am going to stand on principle on this one. We as adults in the community have a responsibility to exhibit proper behavior. If that is retro moralism, I am proud to wear the label.
Tom
I’m saying that if I’m a concerned parent, I’d rather have a War on Cigarettes than a War on Weed. I’d want tobacco criminalized before I’d care about marijuana being decriminalized.
That is, if I thought criminalizing tobacco would actually do anything beside making Appalachian hill farmers rich.
You’re seem to be kind of stuck on this idea is a big huge money-grab for the local dope economy. Quite the opposite.
I think several of these comments show exactly the kind of PR hill Humboldt County is up against. It’s a true shame because there is a brand name that could be capitalized upon – but I think that brand name has already been slipping quickly. I for instance don’t think the best weed comes from Humboldt County any more. I had my best in recent years in Illinois in the dead of winter Jan 09. stickiest sweetest bud I’d ever seen.
A much better approach is to start thinking about Hemp Growing Coops and organic hemp based products. Hemp is a lovely "sideeffect" to legalization that can and should be capitalized upon.
Tom,
I was here in the Sixties, Seventies and Eighties and the sheriff’s dept., the federal officers, CAMP, MET, the DA,–all the mighty forces of the government, including the army at one point–tried to eradicate pot. For God’s sake, men went to jail for a few plants. In the early Seventies there is a report of how a sheriff staked out 2 plants in coffee cans for two weeks. That is some serious attempts to eradicate marijuana but it is still with us. The only things the eradication attempts accomplished was to make government look foolish, drive up the price of marijuana, and horribly destroy the lives of a few of the unlucky growers.
kymk, me too I saw it as well. But….I never said a thing about eradication in either of my remarks.
It’s a waste of time, same with locking people up. I will say it again….. start seizing vehicles, homes and land. Laws are alreads on the books. The problem will go away in 90 days. Anything else is a complete waste of time. But we all know why they don’t want to stop it. The largest and most powerful union in the state, the prison guard union, wouldn’t go for it. Not to mention the social work industry, recovery, medical etc etc. There is an entire industry established around keeping a steady supply of drug addicts in the population. It’s always about the money. Always. And there is just as much shame on the Rep as well as the Dems. And now they want to mainstream another gateway drug? Ya well, if it feels good do it right, the hell with society at large and the message we send to children as adults…what is really important is being able to spark up a bone on the plaza.
An exodus of opportunist is soon to follow. Only those that truly appreciate humboldt for what it really has to offer will remain. No more grow houses, grotesque monster trucks, or free lunch. Non growers will soon have relief; dropping housing prices, lower rents, un-crowded surf , etc. . Housing prices will drop by 30%. Get ready for the good old day’s. Also, any growers that vote no are self serving hypocrites and deserve to leave humboldt. Good thing the census is occurring now.
Everything you are saying is fear based.Prohibition has failed and is part of the attraction to youth due to their rebellious nature. the more sensible approach is to teach kids respect the power of gods creations and use them in the proper manner, i.e.,if you wanna smoke ,Do it after you do your school work and chores and in a safe environment in moderation.Teach them that to need or depend of something for happiness is limiting .Teach them all drugs are not the same and that man made things like coke , booze or l.s.d can be more addictive and dangerous and bad for your health. the lord made plants for our healing and enjoyment and it is up to man to use them respectfully. You are saying they should do this and that but you are missing that it keeps the money in our area.I am a massage therapist with a successful, 60 dollar an hour wage and I couldnt get clients if the $ was not around here.I am still for legalization though cause i am a humanitarian and i know there is people being caged like dogs for using one of gods creations and that they use the laws to oppress poor people and people of color who cant afford good lawyers and are otherwise nonviolent ,good people.
You people seem to miss that 49 other states will remain a black market for herb and that the state of California can not meet that need and will continue to try. That and if you read both bills, you see they are not for commercial production but rather a cottage industry where private people pay taxes of the herb they sell.Until the feds chance, Humboldt will be fine and after that , coffee shops, b,n,b’s and seed banks,and all other kinds of marketing idea will take off.
There will be grow houses but the people will have to triple up to survive,There will be monster truck but they will be of the 84 ford , f350 redneck ,racist variety,because we live n coastal cali., the prices are not going to drop more than 10-20% and with 70 percent of the jobs and stores gone, there will be blight due to lack of repair $, the surf is as uncrowded as it could be.bunkers was 15 foot perfection last week with 3 guys out.The bill is predicted to fail.
LEGALIZE IT! Goodbye to the costly and ineffective war on drugs, Goodbye to the local growers and their over rated weed, Goodbye to gowhouses huge carbon footprint, Goodbye to the delusional rastafari poser fake gangsta wannabes, Goodbye to the over inflated property values and rent! Free up our law enforcement, court systems, and prison systems to deal with serious criminals. Big companies will come in and produce a regulated and quality controlled product, free of powder mildew, mites, sulphur, and other chemicals (maybe even provide jobs for former growers) Hello to a taxable commodity to bail out the state and provide needed services for all.