In its struggle to remain an accredited school, College of the Redwoods just took an important step back from the cliff. CR President Katherine Smith this morning received notice that the community college has been removed from “show cause” status — the final stage before losing accreditation — and put back on “probation,” which is still serious but not borderline catastrophic. (Without accreditation, students wouldn’t be able to transfer credits from CR courses to other schools, making its degrees all but worthless.)

Smith struck an ecstatic tone in an email sent this morning to faculty and staff:

Dear CR Colleagues,

It is with great pleasure and extraordinary relief that I can announce to you that the action letter I received from the ACCJC [Accrediting Commission for Community and Junior Colleges] this morning has removed College of the Redwoods from Show Cause and placed us on Probation! Congratulations to all of us, as the hard work that we have accomplished has paid off!

The accrediting commission, an arm of the Western Association of Schools and Colleges, placed CR on “show cause” status a year ago, citing problems that dated to 1999, including inadequate measurement of student outcomes, insufficient employee evaluations and sub-par communication from the Board of Trustees.

While today’s news is certainly positive, the accrediting commission cautioned that CR still has work to do before sanctions are removed entirely. (Click here for a pdf of the commission’s letter.) Specifically, CR must foster more opportunities for professional development, address employee equity and diversity, and improve fiscal management, among other goals.

“College of the Redwoods should fully resolve the deficiencies noted by October 2013 or the Commission will be compelled to take adverse action,” states commission President Barbara Beno in the action letter to Smith.

But for now, Beno continues, “The institution’s accreditation has been extended for good cause.”

That’s progress.

Smith, who is in her first year as president, following the unpopular and controversial Dr. Jeff Marsee, closed her email to colleagues with gratitude:

“Again, CONGRATULATIONS and THANK YOU for all the effort everyone put into this!  It is indeed a good day at CR!”

Ryan Burns worked for the Journal from 2008 to 2013, covering a diverse mix of North Coast subjects,...

Join the Conversation

2 Comments

  1. The following statement from the NCJ is misleading and sensational:
    “Without accreditation, students wouldn’t be able to transfer credits from CR courses to other schools, making its degrees all but worthless.”

    This is ONLY true for courses and degrees received AFTER accreditation is revoked. However, CR would not offer courses or degrees IF accreditation were revoked; they would close. In other words, NO courses or degrees awarded would be made “worthless”.
    Revoking accreditation does NOT have a retroactive impact on courses and degrees completed prior to accreditation being revoked.

    This new status is very good news. CR has complied with the accreditation requirements and they should be off of probation soon.

Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *