August 19, 2004
IN
THE NEWS | GARDEN | THE HUM | CALENDAR
Dr. Doug Wimer's medical bag,
packed and ready for housecalls.
Photo by Bob Doran.
by HANK
SIMS
LOOKING BACK OVER THE FIRST
FEW YEARS OF HIS MEDICAL practice one morning last week, a personal
saying -- one that he had obviously said to himself many times,
in the old days -- sprang to Dr. Doug Wimer's lips.
"Doctors are the lowest form of existence,"
he said. He partly recanted the comment the next day -- Humboldt
County has an excellent, dedicated medical community, he said
-- but the old feeling of being constantly rushed, of having
to run the gauntlet daily, had obviously returned to him, if
just for a moment.
At 35, Wimer retains in his
manner much of the small-town Idaho kid he once was -- he's talkative
and plain-spoken, but hesitant to speak with a reporter about
his work for fear that it would smack of self-promotion. Local
television viewers know him as "Dr. Doug," the affable
young physician who answers medical questions on KIEM-TV's 5
p.m. broadcasts every Monday.
While most people know that
doctors work long hours, probably few think of them as people
who are hurting financially. But Wimer said that over the last
few years, physicians have suffered from many of the same pressures
that other local businesses have faced -- the rising cost of
Workers' Compensation Insurance, the higher cost of rent and
utilities -- plus special business problems peculiar to the industry.
"At the same time things
were going up, the reimbursement [from insurance companies and
Medicare] for doing them was going down," he said last week.
"The way we compensated for that was seeing more patients.
Instead of seeing them in 15 minutes, we'll see them in 10. We'll
see them in five. It was just a mill. You were plowing your way
through it.
"It wasn't satisfying to
try to see someone in three to four minutes -- or five, or 10
minutes -- and get out of the room even though they weren't done
asking questions. It just wasn't satisfying to do that, and I
wasn't making any money, anyway."
Wimer isn't alone. The Massachusetts
Medical Society conducts an annual survey called the Physician
Practice Environment Index, which in the words of the society
is intended to track "selected factors that shape the overall
environment in which physicians provide patient care." Last
year the index dropped to its lowest point since 1992, when the
society started keeping score. In the last eight years, the index
has dropped over 20 percent. The main factors driving the fall
are the same ones that Wimer lists when he speaks of his frustrations
with his old practice -- the explosion of paperwork required
by Medicare and insurance companies, smaller payments for services
and the rising cost of malpractice insurance and other essentials.
By the time he made a decision to break with the
system, Wimer had 2,700 patients on his books -- right in the
range that most doctors need to have to keep their practice afloat
in an age where prices are set by insurers and, in the case of
Medicare, the federal government. More than anything -- more
than the fact that he wasn't doing as well financially as he
had hoped, or that he was working long hours -- it was the sheer
impossibility of taking care of 2,700 people that caused his
own, personal job satisfaction index to plummet.
"There were times when
I would wake up at night and say, `What ever happened to Joe?'"
Wimer recalls. "'He had those pains and he said he was going
to try this, and I never heard back from him.'"
He began to have what he calls
the "How do I get out of medicine?" dream -- a not
uncommon one among physicians, he said. "I was dissatisfied
with it enough that I knew I couldn't keep going to work every
Monday morning. I didn't want to do it any more."
But before he quit his practice,
or became so burned out that it stopped meaning anything to him,
he took the plunge and reformed his business in such a way that
he would never have to take orders from the money people again.
BACK
TO BASICS
In May, Wimer became the first
local doctor to adopt a "retainer-based" business model,
an option that is appealing to more and more primary care physicians
each year. The economics of the model are simple: Patients pay
Wimer $1,000 each year (people under 40 pay $500). In return,
they receive unlimited medical attention -- appointments at short
notice, questions answered by e-mail, 24-hour phone consultations
and house calls. Blood tests and EKGs are free. Wimer will cap
his patient load at 350 -- and after three months, he said he's
already halfway there.
With his cash flow coming in
directly from his patients, Wimer doesn't spend any of his time
dealing with the copious amounts of insurance and Medicare paperwork
that other doctors must. He has been able to reduce his staff
from about five support workers -- some of whom he shared with
a colleague -- to just one, a receptionist. Patients may still
try to bill their insurance on their own for visits to Wimer's
office. Though he doesn't make any promises about whether insurers
will pay, his office reports that a few people have been able
to get companies to reimburse them at their standard rates for
general practitioner visits.
"It's so much more rewarding,"
Wimer said. "The feedback I get from patients is positive.
I don't worry as much anymore about stuff slipping through the
cracks. I know that I have the time to follow each problem until
its resolution, and I also know that when I put a chart back
on the rack I'm going to be looking at it again in a few months.
I called two people up yesterday and said, `Hey, you never did
stop back by for that urine test.'"
Though there are no definitive
numbers, retainer-based practices -- often called "boutique"
or "concierge" services, terms Wimer deplores -- seem
to have exploded over the past 10 years. A professional organization,
the American Society of Concierge Physicians, was recently formed
to be the public face of the new industry. Magazines and journals
that cover the medical field are increasingly following the phenomenon,
and doctors fill online bulletin boards with wistful dreams about
taking the plunge.
"OK, anyone out there besides
me have dreams of telling insurers to take their contracts and
their quality control/utilization management/nurse case reviewers
and shove them?" one frustrated physician asked the users
of docsboard.com earlier this month.
The modern history of retainer-based practices
goes back to 1996, when two Seattle-based physicians formed a
practice they called MD2, offering a limited clientele many of
the services that Wimer offers today. Many new firms -- ranging
from single-doctor practices to large, coast-to-coast conglomerates
-- have since built on the model, some of them offering luxury
amenities like personal bathrobes, according to online newsletter
bankrate.com.
But the retainer model isn't
all that new or innovative. Dr. Richard Ricklefs [photo at left] ,
the pioneering Hoopa physician, originally charged his patients
$25 per year -- about $150 today, after being adjusted for inflation
-- for his services when he opened his practice in the early
1950s (see
"Medicine Man," North Coast Journal, April 1996).
"That's what I started
out with about 50 years ago," Ricklefs said last week when
told about Wimer's practice. "It gives you an opportunity
to treat them properly without them having to worry about paying
for another visit."
Ricklefs, who is now retired,
added that he was happy that he wasn't starting out in these
times, when the bureaucracy associated with the industry has
such a powerful hold on how a physician spends his time with
patients.
"The economics of medicine
I wouldn't like it all, the way it is now," he said. "I
don't think I'd want to do go into medicine now, though I'd probably
find some way to get around it."
STANDING
ALONE
"I would describe the medical community as
being clinically depressed," Dr. Alan Glaseroff [photo at right]
said last week in his office Humboldt-Del Norte Independent Practice
Association.
As president of the association,
Glaseroff pays particular attention to the problems local physicians
face in their attempt to serve the public. He agrees with much
of Wimer's diagnosis of the business climate physicians must
work under now, and sympathizes with the temptation to chuck
it all away in favor of a practice supported directly by its
clients.
"I understand why he did
it," he said. "I think he's a good doc, and his motivation
is to provide better care and have a reasonable life. Those are
good things."
But Glaseroff had two main concerns.
First, he felt badly for Wimer's former patients who could not
afford to follow him into his new practice and had to find a
new doctor. Just as importantly, though, by withdrawing from
the mainstream Wimer had lost the incentive to fight to reform
it.
"We're right on the edge
of exciting times, I think," Glaseroff said.
Thanks to pressure from patients
and businesses, which in the current system are charged with
providing health care coverage to their workers, there is strong
movement to reform the way in which health care is practiced,
Glaseroff said. He envisions a system in which insurers pay for
preventative care, for patient education and e-mail consultations
-- all things that could reduce the number of patients a doctor
must see any given day.
For Glaseroff, the best cure
for the "clinical depression" besetting doctors is
to lead efforts for system reform -- and in doing so, remember
what attracted them to medicine In the first place. Like Wimer,
he believes in a return to the ideals that they both had in medical
school. But Glaseroff said that true reform in how care is delivered
must extend a doctor's reach, not limit it. He said that he knows
many doctors who still love practicing medicine because they
find ways to extend their work to ever-greater numbers of people.
"What I find is that the
more involved people are in quality improvement efforts, in community-wide
efforts and things like that, the more they enjoy their lives,
even with all the stuff they have to put up with," Glaseroff
said. "The further you are away from the mission of health
care -- those are the depressed people. The people who are involved
in the things that go beyond themselves and their office are
happier and more excited. Doug's model is a model that sort of
isolates him. It doesn't make him part of a bigger effort."
350
OR NONE
One
recent morning, Patricia Petersen of Eureka [photo at left] came
in to get some blood tests. Like Wimer himself, Petersen has
type I diabetes -- a chronic illness that requires frequent medical
check-ups. (Wimer said that his practice attracts a good number
of diabetics, as patients appreciate the fact that he has first-hand
experience with the condition.)
As she requires closer and more
constant medical attention than most, Wimer's retainer practice
is more cost-effective for her than it would be for many other
people. But that's not the reason she chooses his practice, she
explains.
"I've been a patient of
Dr. Wimer's for maybe four years -- myself, my husband and my
94-year-old dad," she said. "He's a wonderful doctor.
He just takes time to explain everything. He draws illustrations
and tells us more than our non-medical brains are probably able
to absorb. I never felt, even with the patient load he had, that
you didn't get the quality care you were seeking."
Still, Petersen acknowledged
that with his new billing practices, not everyone could afford
to have a doctor as careful and meticulous as Wimer. Her own
father, she said, was one of the hundreds who had to seek a new
doctor when he went to the retainer model. And Petersen, like
most of Wimer's patients, continued to keep up to date on her
insurance payments; the biggest medical bills come after a patient
has to see a specialist, or go to the hospital, and Wimer's $1,000
per year certainly doesn't cover that.
Wimer isn't insensitive to the
plight of those who can't afford his services, but he believes
he made the right choice. "It came down to -- either I'd
see 350 patients or I'd see none," he said. If he had simply
given up the business, if his "How do I get out of medicine"
dream had come true and he found work with the Juvenile Diabetes
Research Foundation, that would be 350 more patients dumped on
Humboldt County's already overtaxed network of primary care doctors.
The great fear, Wimer said,
is that the retainer model will be so tempting that large numbers
of doctors will abandon the insurance/Medicare system to go it
alone. If any significant percentage of Humboldt County's approximately
100 family doctors were to go to a retainer-based practice, it
wouldn't take long for the remaining doctors to become overloaded
with patients who can't afford the retainer. Wimer doesn't see
it happening.
"Probably the biggest fear
that people have is that this is going to create an exodus of
providers from the current system," he said. "Being
on call 24/7 is definitely not for everybody."
Wimer is still working out the
kinks. One of these days, he's going to have to figure out a
way to get someone to cover for him, in case he has a family
emergency or he ever wants to take his wife and kids on a vacation.
Getting a partner or swapping down times with another retainer-based
doc would be one solution, if another local doctor wants to adopt
the retainer model. Or he could get a doc-for-hire to cover his
practice, but they do charge about $1,000 per day.
Despite his new practice's shortcomings,
though, Wimer isn't looking back. He's unearthed the doctor's
bag that his old family physician, the one who treated his diabetes
when he was a kid, gave to him when he graduated from medical
school. When he first got the present, Wimer thought his old
doctor had lost touch with how medicine operated these days.
It turns out he was ahead of his time.
IN
THE NEWS | GARDEN | THE HUM | CALENDAR
Comments?
© Copyright 2004, North Coast Journal,
Inc.
|