
COVER STORY | IN
THE NEWS | FROM THE PUBLISHER | STAGE
MATTERS | DIRT
TALK OF THE TABLE | THE HUM | CALENDAR
December 14, 2006


Flaming out
by HANK SIMS
Just a few hours ago, one
of our readers called up to chat. He didn't have a story tip,
as he often does. He didn't have a question that he hoped we
could help him with, as other readers do. He just wanted to say,
wasn't that a strange weekend in Eureka?
There was the fire that burned down a building
in Old Town Friday night -- that was strange. (See this week's
"Talk of the Table" column for a rundown of what was
lost.) But mostly, he said, it was just odd and off-putting to
contemplate the scene of the two-day standoff between the Eureka
Police Department and 50-year-old Weaverville fugitive Jonni
Honda at the Super 8 Motel, located downtown between Fourth and
Fifth streets. Police had cordoned off the block around the Super
8, waiting for an armed Honda to come out of his room and be
taken into custody.
Outside, life went on as normal. Traffic flowed
up and down Highway 101. One detail particularly struck our reader
-- he watched as a mother and her child walked past the motel.
This image seemed to puzzle him. He couldn't mentally bridge
the gap. How could normal life exist while panic and high-powered
lethal weaponry reined just 30 yards away?
Jonni Honda had been on the run from the law since
August. He was wanted in Trinity County on several charges of
lewd conduct with children under the age of 14. Before showing
up in Eureka, he had apparently hid in the woods for several
weeks. After 36 hours of patient negotiation, in which the EPD
apparently tried everything they could to get Honda to surrender,
the police fired tear gas into his hotel room. He came out armed,
allegedly aimed his weapon at police officers and was shot dead,
right at the same time as the fire raged in Old Town.
The outcome wasn't entirely surprising for some
people who knew Honda. Earlier in the week, on Monday, we spoke
with Honda's ex-wife. Mifty Honda is a nurse in Eugene. She was
married to Honda for about two and a half years, she said. They
were divorced in 1986. The couple had a son, who is now in the
US Navy, stationed in San Diego. Despite their short marriage,
she kept her ex-husband's name -- she said that she kept it because
she wanted to have the same name as her son.
Honda said that her ex-husband was a tough man
-- he had lived his whole life in Trinity County -- and that
toughness manifested itself in many different ways, not all of
them positive. He was stubborn and self-centered, she said, and
often ended up hurting the people around him. On the other hand,
in his career as an EMT and volunteer fireman he was often exceptionally
heroic.
"What I want to say is that we're all flawed
human beings," she said. "I don't think that anyone
can judge him, and no one really can know the truth of the situation
-- whether he did that or not."
On the other hand, she had no quibble at all with
the way the police handled the situation. She said that she had
followed the EPD standoff from afar since it first made the news,
and it seemed to her that they had taken every precaution, giving
her ex-husband every opportunity they reasonably could.
"He put himself there," she said. "He
made those choices. He chose to run. He chose to hole up in a
hotel. He chose to stay there for 32 hours, and he chose to come
out with a gun in his hand. He chose to die. Police -- they have
a tough job. And they have families to go home to. And they gave
him every chance to come out. To his credit, he did not shoot
any of the police. He worked closely with the police -- he wouldn't
have done that.
"But that's all I can say to his credit. He
left his family with that final, horrifying picture, and his
children and mother will now live with that."
Mifty Honda said that she had necessarily continued
to stay in contact with her ex-husband throughout the years,
having had a child together. She was acquainted with his current
wife, and with the daughter he had from a different marriage.
Her thoughts were with them now. She said: "I pray for his
children and that they will find peace in the understanding that
their dad can stop running now -- from all the demons that pursued
him way before the law gave chase."

Tuesday morning inside the county elections office,
moments before the hand recount of ballots in the recent election
was to begin. County Elections Manager Lindsey McWilliams stood
before a conference room packed with elections volunteers and
representatives of the campaigns of Jeff Leonard and Ron Kuhnel,
lecturing them on how the recount would proceed. Don Leonard,
father of the incumbent Eureka City Councilmember and former
chief of the Humboldt County Conventions & Visitors Bureau,
resigned himself to the fact that he'd be spending a few days
inside the dimly lit county building, standing in for his son
while the recount proceeded. He wasn't too happy about it. He
felt that it was extremely unlikely that his son's 28-vote lead
would be reversed by hand-scrutinizing of the ballots.
As it happened, Ron Kuhnel felt the same way, but
he had decided to go ahead and pay for a manual recount anyway.
For one, it would put his supporters' suspicions to rest. For
another, it would serve as an opportunity to test the county's
electronic vote-counting apparatus, which some citizens view
with suspicion. Unlike Leonard, Kuhnel, who is retired, was present.
After his lecture, McWilliams divided the counters
into three groups, or "panels." Each would tackle a
few different city precincts. There were four workers to a panel.
One would look at the ballot and call the vote. Another would
verify the call. Two others would keep a running tally. One volunteer
from each campaign could attend each panel, and challenge votes
they thought may have been called in error. High-ranking elections
staff members would have the final call on each disputed ballot.
The panels got their first precincts ... and there
were problems right away. In one case, the precinct package to
be counted contained two fewer ballots than expected. In another,
it contained seven ballots fewer. For about 10 minutes, McWilliams
and his colleagues were extremely tense as they tried to figure
out what had gone wrong. Finally -- hallelujah -- the errant
ballots were located. They had been misfiled in a package containing
provisional ballots from around the city.
Good news. Too good, in a way. In fact, workers
had found not nine ballots but 10 -- one of them extra, that
had somehow not been included in the accounting. But the feeling
seemed to be that too many ballots was better than too few, and
the count got underway.
Everything was resolved, apparently. Reached at
his home during the lunch break, Kuhnel, said that things had
been going swimmingly all morning. The workers had been flying
through the ballots, and it wasn't entirely unreasonable to think
that the recount might only take two days, not the three foreseen.
Campaign volunteers from one side or another had challenged a
small handful of ballots, he believed, but none of the decisions
in the votes in the panel he had been attending had been disputed.
The big news, if there was any, was that two new
ballots had been found -- that one from the morning and another
that voting machines had apparently failed to count on election
day because of physical damage. Two new votes. According to Kuhnel,
both of them went to Leonard.
TOP
COVER STORY | IN
THE NEWS | FROM THE PUBLISHER | STAGE
MATTERS | DIRT
TALK OF THE TABLE | THE HUM | CALENDAR
Comments? Write a letter!

© Copyright 2006, North Coast Journal, Inc.
|