
COVER STORY | IN THE NEWS | DIRT | ARTBEAT
TALK OF THE TABLE | THE HUM | CALENDAR
October 19, 2006


The Other Shoe
by HANK SIMS
It's been at the top of Eureka's collective mind
for the past six months. It's been the subject of intense media
scrutiny. It played a part in the last election, and it's playing
a part in this one. The actions taken that day formed the basis
for a four-day inquest, which played out kind of like a hearing
of South Africa's Truth and Reconciliation Commission. And now,
likely as not, the Eureka Police Department's shooting
of Cheri Lyn Moore, a mentally disturbed woman who lived
downtown, is going to be the subject of a fierce and wide-ranging
lawsuit.
Maybe. The first step toward such a suit was taken
last week, as attorneys for Moore's family filed a claim for
damages against the City of Eureka, just as a deadline for such
a claim was approaching. If the city does not come back with
an offer that suits the family, they will then have the right
to sue.
The claim was filed by the Gordon Kaupp,
a young attorney with Dennis Cunningham's San Francisco
firm. It was Cunningham who led the "Pepper Spray"
case against the EPD and the Humboldt County Sheriff's Department,
and he is to be feared. That particular case dragged on for five
years in federal court, and ended with the the city and the county
ponying up massive legal fees, to pay both its own attorneys
and Cunningham's firm. Kaupp filed the claim on behalf of Moore's
son, her granddaughter and her estate.
Kaupp said Monday that he didn't think a suit was
inevitable -- there is always the chance, however slight, that
the city's insurance carrier will simply decide to cut its losses
by cutting Moore's family a check. Then again, he said, his clients
might well prefer to see the matter handled though the criminal
justice system, if District Attorney Paul Gallegos ever
decides whether or not he wants to charge the police with misconduct.
(He might well prefer simply to let the cops sweat a while longer.)
"The family would like to see how the district
attorney handles the coroner's inquest, whether they bring charges,"
Kaupp said. "The family wants to see how the criminal system
handles it up there before they file a lawsuit."
But as the claim against the city makes clear,
the suit, if it comes, will be wide-ranging, as is typical of
cases brought by Cunningham's firm. It charges the police with:
wrongful death, assault, battery, false imprisonment, illegal
search and seizure, "deliberate indifference to medical
needs," deprivation of due process and violation of Moore's
Constitutional rights. It names 11 individual EPD officers, from
the chief of police on down, as defendants in the case. (For
background on the case, see "Cause of Death," Sept.
21.)
As it happened, the claimed served as sort of a
"Welcome to Eureka" present for new City Attorney Sheryl
Schaffner, who started last week. Schaffner doesn't have
much to do yet -- she simply forwarded it to the city insurance
company, and will be checking to make sure Kaupp filed the claim
in a timely manner.
"This is a very general claim -- it's only
two pages long," Schaffner said Monday. "We'll get
more detail from them as time goes on."
No doubt.

A few weeks ago, this space carried a short item
that challenged the county's many cranky old Arcata-haters to
either put up or shut their goddamn yaps. Truth be told, we asserted,
Arcata is simply the best-run city in Humboldt County, and people
who think otherwise are trapped in a hole in the fabric of the
space-time continuum, unable to adjust their psyches to the fact
that the year on the calendar no longer reads "1956."
The world has moved on, people. The Commies gave up on their
plans to subvert the American Way with "reefer" and
Chuck Berry records quite some time ago, in case you haven't
heard. No longer are the Reds trying to sap your precious bodily
fluids through fluoridation of the municipal water supply. (Whoops!)
Fact is, Arcata is the North Coast's "can-do"
city. As evidence, we offered the observation that residents'
number one beef with City Hall is over potholes. This is proof
positive, we said, of a healthy government -- when people have
nothing else to complain about, they complain about potholes.
And lo and behold, a scientific poll of Arcata residents conducted
by a Sacramento firm a few weeks ago showed that potholes are,
indeed, far and away the thing most on the mind of Arcatans this
election season: An astounding 98 percent of the populace supported
the idea of making pothole-filling one of the city's top high-priority
issues. Eighty-eight percent "strongly" supported the
idea. (For full results of the poll, which covers all kinds of
fascinating questions, see this week's Arcata Eye. Beware
the obvious typo in question number six, or go the the Eye's
website for a corrected version.)
As further proof, we mentioned that Arcata's manufacturing
sector is relatively healthy, unlike that of any other Humboldt
County burg you could name. It was at this point that the anonymous
blogger known as Anon.R.mous completely blew his stack.
The notion of Arcata having any sort of manufacturing sector
at all seemed to freak his head. It seemed to threaten his cherished
picture of Arcata as a town run by and for the lunatics, a place
hopped up to its head on LSD and flower power. "Are you
kidding me, Hank, you have zero facts to back up your story,"
he fumed. "NONE. So far, you have posted ZERO FACTS."
Now, let us say up front that unlike most of the
rest of the Humboldt County blogosphere, we thoroughly dig Anon.R.mous
("The Mouse") and his Super Happy Fun Blog! He enlivens
his hippie-hating world-gone-mad shtick -- not unappealing in
itself -- with a lively, bitter sense of humor. He can sometimes
go overboard, as he did when he encouraged his readers to graffiti
the home of a mural-lover a few months ago, but mostly he stays
within the bounds of decency. As per expectations, though, The
Mouse was wrong, wrong, wrong when he chose to step to The Dandy.
When we lauded Arcata's manufacturing sector, it
seemed obvious enough. After all, Arcata is the home of Wing
Inflatables, probably Humboldt County's only military contractor.
It's got Wallace and Hinz, Sunfrost, Fire and Light. For
Christ's sake, it's even got Amulet Manufacturing, makers
of heavy bulldozer add-ons. And Eureka has ... ? But none of
that overwhelming anecdotal evidence was good enough for The
Mouse. Until we came up with some hard numbers, he said, he would
continue to plug his ears and whistle.
Well, here you go, Mouse, courtesy of the U.S.
Census Bureau's North American Industry Classification System
Zip Code Business Patterns Survey of 2004. In 2004, the Arcata
zip code (95521) was home to 53 manufacturing firms, over one-third
of the county's total. Of those 53 firms, 26 had more than 10
employees, and six had over 50 employees. Among the types of
manufacturers represented: fabricated metal, rubber products,
glassware, construction machinery, furniture, clothing, appliances,
electrical fixtures, musical instruments and many others.
Now, how many manufacturing firms were in the Eureka
(95501) zip code? Twenty-seven -- just about exactly half, in
a city twice Arcata's size. Most of them were mom `n' pop places
-- only nine had more than 10 employees, and only two had more
than 50. What sorts of firms were they? The two big ones were
Schmidbauer Lumber and Pacific Choice Seafoods.
Moving down, we have: candy companies, a slaughterhouse, bakeries,
a tortilla shop and some commercial printers. That's pretty much
it.
And don't even talk to me about Fortuna (nine firms
total, about a sixth of Arcata's) or McKinleyville (eight). Chump
change for two Arcata-sized towns, both of them also-rans in
this particular game. (At the time, Pacific Lumber was the county's
largest single manufacturer by far, and it probably still is.)
So that's all for you, Mouse! Spin and sputter
all you like -- we're sure you will -- but you just got served,
son. There's another fun lesson about how the Arcata manufacturing
economy was in fact built by the scrungiest group of hippies
that ever ran the place -- including last week's subject, Wes
Chesbro -- but that'll have to keep for another day.
TOP
COVER STORY | IN THE NEWS | DIRT | ARTBEAT
TALK OF THE TABLE | THE HUM | CALENDAR
Comments? Write a letter!

© Copyright 2006, North Coast Journal, Inc.
|