|


by BOB DORAN
See also these
features at the end of this cover story:
From marshland
to post-industrial wasteland: Historical timeline of the Balloon
Tract
What's next
for the Balloon Tract?
THE BALLOON TRACK TRACT, that
slice of land between Eureka's waterfront and the elbow of Broadway
and Highway 101, is a mystery to many. Even its name is confusing.
(The "tract" actually got its name from the railroad
"track" that borders the site in the shape of a giant
hot-air balloon. [See
aerial photo in article below.])
What was once a bustling industrial
hub on the waterfront has fallen on hard times. The railway yard
slipped into disuse years ago. The structures have fallen into
disrepair. Oil soaks the ground. Weeds run rampant. Since overgrown
vegetation and abandoned buildings provide a haven for Eureka's
homeless and a party place for drug users, most people steer
clear of the area except those who sneak in to illegally dump
loads of trash. [A historical timeline of the Balloon Tract
appears after this article]
But Cindy Hooper [at right, in above title photo] an art professor at College of the Redwoods who
specializes in delicate oil paintings of "overlooked and
maligned places," landscapes strewn with trash or marred
by broken buildings finds beauty amid the blight. To celebrate
the much maligned parcel, the artist/professor became the prime
mover behind The Balloon Tract Project: An Exploration of
Misintentional Landscape Use, an installation that opened
last week down the street from the old railyard at Humboldt State
University's First Street Gallery in Old Town.
"Residual Appeal
2000," painting by Cindy Hooper.
The balloon-shaped tract has
been in the spotlight several times over the last few years.
In 1999 the owner, Union Pacific, agreed to sell to the giant
retailer, Wal-Mart. Controversy erupted over the wisdom of big
box stores in general and, in particular, using a piece of land
adjacent to the waterfront for retail purposes. The issue was
ultimately resolved at the ballot box with the defeat of Measure
J, an initiative that would have changed the zoning for the area
to commercial.
Last year the tract hit the
headlines again when the Eureka City Council shocked many observers
by refusing a $3 million gift from businessman Rob Arkley and
his wife, Cherie, who sits on the council. The money was to be
used to purchase the parcel, clean it up and develop it for light
industry, a park and a parking lot.
Hooper and her team of College
of the Redwoods professors from several disciplines who worked
on the current "Balloon Tract Project" steered clear
of those controversies, however. They focused instead on the
area's landscape and the way the land historically has been used
and abused.
Hooper sees the interplay "of
beauty and blight" as one of the primary subjects in her
work.
"These overlooked and maligned
places and objects can actually have a very formal abstract beauty,"
she said in a conversation at the gallery where she was supervising
the exhibit installation. "They are full of meaning and
aesthetic merits and can be explored and understood through a
variety of different perspectives.
"Humans have had a tremendous
impact on the land and to avoid that in art is being overly idealistic.
There are certainly many places here in Humboldt County where
you can look at a view and not see human intervention, but in
most places it's there."
Hooper drew inspiration from
an organization called the Center for Land Use Interpretation
based in Los Angeles, an interdisciplinary group combining art,
geography, sociology and other disciplines.
"Pink Shoe (I didn't Place
it There)" by Jim Pegoda
"When I walked into the
galleries and offices for the Center for Land Use Interpretation
[CLUI] in Los Angeles, I said, `Whoa, this is wonderful.' They
were expressing in a conceptual way the same issues I'm trying
to express with paint. I felt an immediate kinship."
Even before Hooper found out
about the CLUI she was exploring the Balloon Tract as a landscape
painter.
"I've been a painter of
industrial sites for a while. I don't know why, but they inspire
me. I'm interested in examining the way humanity shapes the land
by their actions on a grand scale that can be comparable to the
forces of nature."
She is also part of a second
show running this month at the First Street Gallery. Disruptive
Topographies features her work and paintings by two kindred
spirits, Erling Sjovold and Jerry Smith. All the work was produced
during a CLUI residency at an abandoned military base in Wendover,
Utah.
"A lot of the motifs that
you find at the Balloon Tract, the oil drums, the barrels, the
piles of trash are like what you find at Wendover," said
Hooper. "It's like 100 square miles of Balloon Tract.
"I think what most fascinates
me is the juxtaposition of incredible natural beauty and ravaged
industrial places the remnants of our post-industrial consumer-based
culture. The stark interplay of degradation, reclamation and
natural beauty is an ironic contrast that I find of interest
as an artist.
"The Center is very much
interested in abandoned and overlooked industrial sites and in
investigating these places," she said, adding that CLUI
has funded a show similar to the Balloon Tract Project at San
Francisco's Yerba Buena Center dealing with industrial sites
around San Francisco Bay.
"These are areas that are
absolutely essential to the infrastructure of our culture, but
they're also places people don't want to deal with," she
said.
"One of the things we found
was that this is a spot that many consider as blight, yet it
has a value," said Dave Bazard [at left, in top title photo],
a geology professor who worked on the project. "And that
value is not necessarily just as a site for future industrial
activity, for a Wal-Mart or even a park. It's a value for its
history, for what's in its subsurface, for the geologic story
that can tell us how our area was shaped, the archaeological
and sociological aspect.
"The whole Balloon Tract,
everything west of Broadway, was once a salt marsh similar to
what you see as you go over the Samoa Bridge on Gunther Island
and Woodley Island," said Bazard. "A railroad was put
around it and eventually it was filled in."
He found that an examination
of the area's geology spilled over into a history of its uses
and into an examination of the pollution and its clean up.
His job was not an easy one.
When he went to the Office of Environmental Health and asked
for the Balloon Tract file, they showed him a four-foot long
shelf full of reports from consultants. His task was to boil
down the mountain of data to a few "digestible" panels
that a layman can understand.
Bazard concluded from his research
that by the mid-'70s, the use of the rail yard was in serious
decline. The unused buildings were falling apart, the old roundhouse
had collapsed.
"That was also around the
time when they first started looking at the run-off from the
site," said Bazard. Every time it rained, oil and grease
that had spilled on the ground over the years would wash out
of the contaminated soil, draining oily water into the slough,
then into the bay.
"Up until that time the
thought was, `Well this is industry. This is what we do.' It
was accepted. As environmental awareness mushroomed in the early
'70s, the thinking changed."
In 1974 the Regional Water Quality
Control Board took a look at the site and did not like what it
found. Southern Pacific was asked to take countermeasures that
included installation of an oil-water separator.
Further remediation since then
has removed the bulk of the oil that was getting into the bay.
And since Union Pacific only uses the site as storage for a few
rusting locomotives and cars, there is no new pollution associated
with the railroad.
"There is still industrial
pollution," said Bazard, but that's not the only problem.
"Even though it's no longer an industrial site, the pollution
has been incrementally added to by dumping. People leave oil
drums, then there are the lead acid batteries from cars."
At this point the only clean
up of hydrocarbon contamination is what is termed "passive
remediation," relying on the natural breakdown process.
Any future development will require a major clean-up process.
A prime example is Bunker C,
the old oil storage tank.
"You walk in there and
a black ooze comes up, so obviously there's still something in
there," said Bazard. He explained that a cement pad underneath
prevents contamination of ground water, "but at some point
someone will have to remove it all.
"Whoever takes it on will
have some serious work to do. When you buy commercial property
that's contaminated you accept the liability for cleaning up
the contamination."
"But we don't want to overdramatize
or sensationalize the problems with contamination," said
Hooper. "This is certainly not a superfund cleanup site.
There have been remediation efforts and there are ongoing monitoring
efforts. In the large view [the contamination] is not that egregious."
Bazard pointed to other sites
along that waterfront that are much worse, places with lingering
PCBs, lead contamination, heavy metals and other toxic substances
that don't seem to be a problem in the Balloon Tract.
A portion of the exhibit supervised
by C/R biology professor Ben Hawkins examines the ecology of
the area.
The plant life is a classic
example of invasive non-native species overrunning natives. Himalaya
berries, pampas grass and fennel are among the non-native plants
that have colonized the site.
The slough may have been converted
into a drainage ditch, but it's still the home to egrets, herons,
kingfishers, possums and even otters.
There's a touch of tongue-in-cheek
humor at work when the exhibit discusses the area's other inhabitants.
For example, Hooper refers to the homeless encampments that dot
the site as "nests."
While she concedes that there
was no study to establish firm numbers, a "casual estimate"
is that 20-30 people call the area home.
"I think that the general
public sees the Balloon Tract as some sort of a problem, but
in a way it solves a problem for the community in that it does
provide a quiet refuge for homeless people where they are out
of sight."
Both Hooper and Bazard emphasize
that the intent behind their project was to present facts about
the area in a neutral fashion, not to make some social or political
statement.
"It's easy to take a vacant
lot with homeless people and some pollution and tell people it's
bad," said Bazard. "The challenge was to draw the value
out of it and lead people to go beyond black-and-white thinking.
"Understanding a place
like this takes some thought. There may be certain sadness to
the site, but there are not necessarily good guys and bad guys.
You have to get beyond the controversy and knee-jerk reactions."
The hope is that the project
will lead to meaningful discussion in the community and to new
inquiries.
"The more we researched,
the more we discovered," said Hooper. "We invite the
public to take up the components of the project that are not
finished, to find this space and others like it and find the
meaning in these overlooked and underutilized places."
The
Balloon Tract Project: An Exploration of Misintentional
Landscape Use will be on display through Nov. 3 in the East
Room of Humboldt State University's First Street Gallery, 422
1st St., Eureka.
In conjunction with the exhibit,
the gallery presents a talk by Matt Coolidge, director of the
Center for Land Use Interpretation on Thursday, Oct. 25, at 6
p.m. Exhibiting artist Erling Sjovold will give a gallery talk
on Saturday, November 3, at 4 p.m. For more information call
443-6363. The Website for the Center for Land Use Interpretation
is at www.clui.com.
From marshland to post-industrial wasteland
![[aerial photo of Balloon Tract]](cover1011-aerial.jpg)
Aerial photo by Merle Shuster, 1952
1850 -- Marshland
and a network of sloughs occupy the site west of the Eureka town
site.
By 1888 -- The western
side of the marsh is filled and a bayside rail line established.
The tidal marsh and Clark Slough remain undeveloped.
By 1915 -- Eastern
and northern portions of the tidal marsh are filled with a mixture
of silt, sand and gravel. The site is used as a railroad yard
for refueling and repair. Bunker C, an oil storage tank, is constructed.
1931 to 1939 -- Southeastern
corner of the site (near Washington Street and Broadway) leased
by Northwestern Pacific Railroad Co. to Richfield Oil Co. and
General Petroleum Co. and two above ground fuel storage tanks
are installed.
1946-1947 -- The last
remaining tidal marsh is diked off. Dredged material from the
bay is used as fill.
1954 -- Above ground
storage tanks installed in the Bunker C site to store diesel
fuel used by modern locomotive engines. By this time Clark Slough
appears as a drainage ditch.
1974 -- The Regional
Water Quality Control Board orders spill prevention, control
and a countermeasure plan. Northwest Pacific Railroad estimates
in a report that 5,000 gallons per day of oily storm water is
discharged into Humboldt Bay with rain runoff.
1975 -- The water
board orders discharge of oily storm water runoff discontinued
and countermeasures for release of petroleum hydrocarbons to
Humboldt Bay implemented.
1976 -- NWPR installs
an oil collection system and above ground oil-water separator.
1984 -- The on-site
diesel storage tanks are no longer in use. A tank truck is used
to fuel locomotives.
1986 -- Southern Pacific
Transportation Co. purchases NWPR, but discontinues operations
at the Eureka rail yard site. Eureka Railroad Co., formed, leases
the railroad yard from Southern Pacific to continue railroad
line operation.
1987 -- Aerial photographs
show the site as mostly inactive. The roundhouse has been demolished,
many of the buildings and other structures dismantled or in disrepair,
and most of the southern area overgrown with brush and grass.
The fuel distribution facilities have been removed.
1988 --
Site use has decreased significantly. Water board order for
oil collection and discharge expires and discharge system is
abandoned.
[At left, a disabled
oil-water separator.]
June 1988 --
At the request of Public Health Department, Southern Pacific
arranges to have four underground gasoline storage tanks removed.
No detectable concentrations of petroleum-associated compounds
are found in the soil surrounding the tanks. However, groundwater
samples contain up to 0.69 milligrams per liter (mg/l) benzene,
1.10 mg/l toulene, and 1.2 mg/l xylenes, all components of petroleum.
An environmental consultant states that the contamination is
likely from an off-site underground storage tank to the east
(near Broadway). The tanks are removed and no further investigation
is conducted.
July-Nov. 1988 --
An environmental impact statement is prepared for construction
of the Humboldt County Jail at the Balloon Track site. An investigation
of soil and groundwater contamination from shallow soil surveys
and groundwater monitoring wells indicates the presence of oil,
grease and petroleum hydrocarbons. Three samples exceed safety
thresholds for lead. The environmental consultant recommends
that the site be cleaned-up before the property is developed.
Another site is chosen for the jail.
1989 -- The water
board requests that Southern Pacific Transportation Co. assess
soil and groundwater quality beneath the Balloon Track Site.
An environmental consulting company is retained to assess the
site, remove potentially hazardous materials and make recommendations
for further clean up.
1989-1990 --
Consultants hired by Southern Pacific perform preliminary investigations
and cleanup activities at the site; about 980 gallons of uncharacterized
oil are removed from the site. Waste materials are either transported
to a recycling facility or disposed at a facility in Kettleman
City, Calif. Approximately 3,500 gallons of oily wastewater are
removed from the oil-water separator system and transported to
a recycling facility. The inoperative oil-water separator is
sealed.
June 1990 -- Aerial
photograph shows that most of the railroad tracks, except along
the northwestern site boundary, have been removed.
1999 -- Soil and groundwater
analyses of samples collected near former underground
storage tank show contamination levels below legal limits. Accordingly,
active remediation in this area is deemed unnecessary.
1999 to 2001 -- Continued
site evaluation. Consultants hired by Wal-Mart had intended to
study the presence of both heavy metals and arsenic in a study
proposed in 1999. Consultants for Union Pacific (formerly Southern
Pacific Transportation Co.) continue to monitor wells quarterly
and report the results to the water board.
Summarized from
maps and aerial photographs displayed in the "Balloon Tract"
exhibit at HSU's First Street Gallery and from the reports of
Geomatrix, an environmental geology consultant to Southern Pacific.
What's next for the Balloon Tract?
With 29 to 30 usable acres adjacent
to the Broadway/Highway 101 corridor and the bay, the Balloon
Tract is ripe for development, but the property has to be cleaned
up first that will not be an easy task.
The city and property owners,
Union Pacific, are looking at clean-up in three phases. Phase
one, already under way, is clearing some of the trash and vegetation.
"The summer of 2000 we
had a couple of fires," said City Manager Dave Tyson. "One
was kind of major -- three or four acres within the Balloon Tract
itself. We think it was transient-caused. It created quite a
bit of concern for the [Eureka] Chamber of Commerce, and of course
our fire marshal and businesses in the area, because it came
fairly close to the businesses that operate near there."
Tyson said one of the city's
primary concerns is the portion of Eureka's population that makes
frequent use of the property -- transients and drug users.
"As part of our abatement
process with Union Pacific we've indicated our fears for employees
who have to go in there -- police mainly, but also firemen who
have to go in the because of drug overdoses or fires, problems
that occur."
Union Pacific applied to the
Coastal Commission and the Department of Fish and Game and received
permission to remove some vegetation. Last spring rushes, berries,
fennel and other foliage that covered much of the parcel were
cut back. Under the terms of the permit, what was done was akin
to mowing a lawn -- and the results were about as permanent.
"Because of the time of
the year when it was cut, a lot of it has grown back," Tyson
acknowledged.
Phase two of the clean-up is
removal of debris -- piles of garbage, dirt, concrete and other
construction materials dumped there illegally. Union Pacific
removed some of the piles along with the vegetation, but like
the re-emerging weeds, it did not end the problem.
"It's a big vacant unpatrolled
piece of property and there has been quite a lot of dumping there,"
Tyson said. The debris removal is also complicated since some
of it is contaminated, which requires testing and more elaborate
disposal than simply hauling it to a landfill site.
"Then there's the removal
of the buildings," Tyson continued. "There are three
or four buildings on the site that need to be removed and [the
owners] are seeking permits to do so. The city is working with
Union Pacific to take them down as they are a fire danger as
well as danger to the public as an attractive nuisance."
The city will act as lead agency
seeking permits from the four or five overlapping government
regulatory agencies involved, including the Coastal Commission.
"The final phase, the clean-up
of the site, will require Union Pacific to work with the city
and more importantly with the state Regional Water Quality Control
Board," Tyson said.
"The [water] board has
quite a bit of say over the property because it is contaminated.
It is known to be affecting groundwater with those contaminates.
Not that it's creating a problem with drinking water because
that all comes through our water treatment plant. But there is
the possibility that it could be affecting the bay water as well
as the aquifers beneath the Balloon Track."
And once the site is cleaned
up, what then?
"At this point there is
no development proposed there," said Tyson. One problem
with planning a development is the zoning. Because it was once
a rail site governed by a public utility, the zoning is "P"
for public, which limits development.
Schools, city halls, jails and
wastewater treatment plants are among acceptable public uses.
Aside from a scuttled plan for relocating the jail there, no
other public use has been proposed. And it's unlikely that anyone
will resurrect the rail yard.
"Union Pacific is no longer
operating a rail operation in the area. A few years ago the Northern
Coast Rail Authority indicated that it has no need for the rail
yard other than [use of] the rails that run along the side of
the property."
While the public rejected Wal-Mart's
Measure J, which would have forced a change in the zoning from
public to commercial, it seems likely that a zoning change of
some sort will be required for development.
"The city, working with
some interested groups -- Friends of Humboldt, the Northcoast
Business Leaders Roundtable, our planning commission, our redevelopment
agency -- have been talking about changing the zoning of the
property and what that would mean," said Tyson. "That
has yet to take off as far as discussion in the community, but
I'm sure it will."
What uses are being suggested?
"Industrial uses, not heavy
industry, but light industrial manufacturing. And there's talk
about saving some of it for recreational use."
Whatever happens there will
be under the watchful eye of the public agencies that protect
the coastal zone and wildlife habitat.
"Most likely if development
was to occur there you would have to mitigate for the loss of
the marshes with more wetlands," said Tyson.
"It's an area we need to
work on as a community. The community has to get involved and
provide some guidance to the elected officials and staff as to
how it fits into the city's development. It is a key piece of
property; it's one of the largest available in our community
for development. We need to define what we'd like to do with
it."
IN
THE NEWS | ARTS! ARCATA | CALENDAR
Comments? E-mail the Journal: ncjour@northcoast.com

© Copyright 2001, North Coast Journal,
Inc.
|