Feb. 3, 2005
IN
THE NEWS | PUBLISHER | STAGE
DOOR | PREVIEW
| THE HUM | CALENDAR
On the cover:
Humboldt State University President
Rollin Richmond looks out his office window.
Photo by Kyana Taillon
by HANK
SIMS
TWO
WEEKS AGO, RICK VREM [photo
at right] , Humboldt State University's
vice president for academic affairs, convened a campus-wide "town-hall
meeting" at the university's Goodwin Forum. The theme of
the meeting was "Academic Quality at HSU," something
that Vrem said he had been thinking about for a long time.
It didn't take long for the
100 or so professors present to learn that Vrem, at least, feared
that the university's academic quality was not quite what it
could be. In fact, he said all the data he gathered suggested
that there were likely serious problems with the quality of teaching
-- the "academic rigor" of HSU coursework.
"Some of you may be saying,
`This is a direct affront to me,'" he said. "What I'm
about to talk about -- it could be perception, or it could be
reality. Even if it's simply perception, I think it's an important
issue for the university to address."
Vrem proceeded to show the assembled
professors a series of slides demonstrating that in the eyes
of many, Humboldt State is simply not a serious place to go to
school. A national survey of college students showed that HSU
students studied less than their peers elsewhere and came to
class unprepared more often. Prospective students gave Humboldt
low scores for academic reputation and intellectual life.
Perhaps worst of all, for someone
with Vrem's job, was this year's edition of the annual U.S.
News survey of the nation's colleges and universities --
for many parents, the definitive guide to whether the school
they're sending their children to is worth the money they'll
be spending. HSU ranked 39th among universities in the western
U.S. this year. Not so long ago, the magazine ranked it as high
as 10th.
"I felt like, as I've seen
this evidence, that I couldn't ignore it," Vrem said. "I
feel like it's something that as a campus -- especially as a
faculty -- we should engage with."
Sitting in the back of the room,
listening intently as the assembled faculty became increasingly
edgy during the hour-long presentation, was HSU President Rollin
Richmond. It's been two and a half years since the 60-year-old
Richmond was hired to rehabilitate the university after the long,
lackadaisical administration of Dr. Alistair McCrone. In that
time, Richmond has built an enviable reputation, both on campus
and off -- dynamic leader, respected scholar, model citizen.
Until recently, it was difficult to find anyone with a harsh
word for him, or even a mildly critical one.
Among HSU faculty, that is starting
to change. Richmond is increasingly turning his attention to
addressing the university's chronic inability to attract as many
students as it would like. His proposed solutions to the problem
are still tentative, but if they are carried out they would mark
a definite shift in the way the university defines itself as
an institution. Many faculty members are excited about Richmond's
ideas, which involve raising the academic profile of HSU so that
it can compete with better-known universities. Others are skeptical,
with some openly protesting what they see as a betrayal of HSU's
history and its mission.
With one or two exceptions,
the professors who spoke in Goodwin Forum that afternoon firmly
rejected the idea that the level of instruction at HSU is sub-par.
Near the end of the meeting, Dr. Stephen Cunha, a respected member
of the geography department, got up to speak. Vrem may have prefaced
his presentation with a disclaimer -- the data may either reflect
"perception" or "reality" or both -- but
if he did think there was something to it, Cunha sought to quash
his notions then and there. Why didn't Vrem look at more tangible
yardsticks of achievement -- for example, the percentage of HSU
undergraduates who had gone on to Ph.D. programs? Cunha said
that geographers around the state, some of them from big, prestigious
schools, salivated over Humboldt's resources and its ability
to turn out skilled alumni ready for graduate school or the workforce.
"They would think you're
smoking some of Humboldt's crop," Cunha said, to the crowd's
amusement. "I don't understand this at all. I don't think
it's that grim, Mr. Grinch."
Finding its `brand'
In his
office a few days after the town hall meeting, Richmond -- a
tall, bespectacled Midwesterner with a quick mind and a straightforward
manner -- pondered the statements members of the faculty had
made in response to Vrem's presentation. A bust of Alexander
von Humboldt rested on a table behind him.
"I think it's true that
there are many, many good faculty here, good courses and students
who benefit from them," Richmond said. "I also think
that there are probably some examples of courses and faculty
and students who could improve. I don't think that even the best
institutions in this country uniformly do a good job."
Richmond thinks that HSU needs
to get serious about addressing its own deficiencies if it is
going to pull itself out of a deepening hole. Compared with other
state universities, HSU is having a hard time finding customers.
Richmond stops just short of calling the campus's problems attracting
new students a "crisis," but there's clearly some cause
for serious concern.
In the last 20 years, California's
population has increased by nearly 10 million while HSU's number
of full-time students has hovered at around 7,000. The university
began a push to increase its student population a few years ago,
but it has been unable to do so. More and more students are applying
to Humboldt and more and more are being accepted, but in the
last five years the number of prospects who actually enroll has
remained steady. Presumably those students who don't enroll opt
for other schools. At the same time, the university has had a
hard time keeping the students who did enroll; last year, about
25 percent of the freshman class and 20 percent of the sophomores
either dropped out or transferred to other schools.
Although HSU ranks near the
middle among CSU campuses in both statistics enrollment and retention
the administration and faculty all agree the university must
do better.
With no increase in enrollment,
HSU is not playing its part as a state-financed institution to
meet California's demand for higher education. It also places
itself at greater risk when the state and the California State
University system divvy up funds for the year -- the fewer students,
the more likely that a university will get a raw deal.
"That's how the budget
is determined," said Scott Hagg, HSU director of admissions.
In the last few years, HSU has
been shooting for ever-higher "enrollment targets."
Right now, HSU is about 200 students short of its 2004-05 enrollment
target of 7,209. The enrollment target is set to increase every
year until at least 2006-07, when the university hopes to have
7,450 students attending. In other words, the university is seeking
to add 400 students -- over half of an entire freshman class
-- in two years. It will be an uphill battle.
Part of the answer to the problem,
Richmond believes, is to market the university better. If more
prospective students were aware of HSU's academic strengths and
its social character, more students would apply to the school
and enroll. Last year the university hired Noel-Levitz, a Colorado-based
consulting firm, to conduct research on campus in an effort to
define the HSU "brand" and figure out how to sell it
better. That's only part of the answer, though -- the rest, Richmond
feels, lies in transforming the university into a place where
more serious young people want to come to learn.
Pushing scholarship
Last semester, a working group
that Richmond had convened to plan for the future of the university
published a "penultimate draft" of its study, the HSU
Strategic Plan. Much of the draft dealt with everyday subjects
that a long-range plan would be expected to address -- new campus
buildings and physical infrastructure, budgeting, relations with
the community.
But one section of the report
proposed a fundamental change in the university's identity. It
recommended that faculty promotion should depend on a professor's
scholarship -- on work done within each faculty member's discipline,
apart from her work in the classroom.
For professors in the sciences
and humanities, scholarship was tightly defined as publishing
work in scholarly journals or securing grants to undertake research;
in the fine arts, it meant professional exhibitions and recognition
by critics and peers. Richmond was an early champion of the proposal.
"This institution, like
the CSU as a whole, its prime mission is to educate young people,"
he said last week. "But I don't believe that you can be
an effective teacher without being engaged in scholarship of
your discipline. That doesn't mean you have to go out and get
a research grant and publish a paper in Science, but it
does mean you have to be engaged, in some way, in trying to move
the field forward intellectually. It doesn't mean you pull books
off the shelf and read it the night before you go in and give
your lecture."
Immediately after the "penultimate
draft" was published, though, several faculty members voiced
strong opposition to the language. In the current faculty handbook,
"scholarship" is defined broadly and includes "development
of curriculum and innovative methods of teaching/librarianship
and practices that significantly enhance or add breadth to one's
skills, abilities and knowledge as a teacher." The change
proposed by the plan was the subject of strong debate in the
Academic Senate, a campus organization representing members of
the faculty.
Dr.
Martin Flashman, an HSU mathematics professor for more than 20
years, [photo at right] is one of the professors opposed to the change.
He said last week that an emphasis on scholarly activity, as
defined in the strategic plan, was inappropriate for a primarily
undergraduate institution such as Humboldt. HSU shouldn't try
to compete with UC Berkeley or UC Davis, he said; its professors
should strive, first and foremost, to be excellent educators.
"It's one of the things
that made Humboldt so special," he said. "It's that
at Humboldt, teaching was first and foremost. Even though it's
still that way in the handbook, various committees have moved
toward a much less accurate reading of that."
Flashman takes great pride in
his ability to get material across to his students and help them
to think creatively about math. The strategic plan, if enacted,
would freeze young professors who sought to follow his lead out
of promotions. Instead, Flashman said, they would be required
to divert their attention away from the classroom and into research
-- all the while moving further and further away from the primary
mission of the California State University system.
In late November, HSU's Associated
Students agreed with Flashman and other professors who thought
that the "scholarship" passage represented a misstep
by the university. The AS -- the legislative arm of student government
-- passed a resolution brought by one of its members, Kyle Zeck,
who said the passage had the "potential to erode the quality
of education at the undergraduate level."
"There is tremendous pressure
being put on professors to prove they are doing a good job by
publishing as much as possible," Zeck wrote in an e-mail
last week. "They don't need that pressure -- they have lives
outside of their job, and their job should be focused on educating
their students. At the end of the day, students don't work hard
through college so that they can subsidize their professor's
research career. They're here to learn."
Flashman's concern for future
generations of HSU undergraduates has led him to what most on
campus would still consider unthinkable -- a certain measure
of nostalgia for the days when Alistair McCrone was in charge.
McCrone may not have had great vision, but his heart was in the
right place, Flashman said.
"I saw McCrone as a person
who was not necessarily leading us some places, but who was flexible
and that his ultimate concern was with undergrads," he said.
"That might be a misreading of him, but the things that
I saw McCrone participating in and supporting at Humboldt seemed
to be aimed at the undergraduates."
More students,
fewer dollars
At
the same time that Richmond is beginning to ask people to work
harder -- in the classroom, in the community and in their disciplines
-- the state budget crisis is placing crippling limits on his
ability to compensate them for their efforts. The CSU system
fared relatively well in last year's budget, but the continuing
rise in health insurance, workers' compensation and other costs
mean that the university could be squeezed tighter in coming
years. If the university's enrollment drive doesn't produce more
students, the problem is likely to be worse.
Robin Meiggs [photo at left] ,
coach of the HSU Women's Crew team and chair of the local chapter
of the California Faculty Association, said last week that she
was concerned that the administration's drive to get faculty
to work harder -- in the classroom, in the community and in their
disciplines -- was coming at a time when faculty layoffs could
be looming.
Meiggs said that each academic
department, across the campus, is being asked to prepare budgets
for the 2005-06 school year that include across-the-board cuts
of 5.5 percent off the current year. There's no sign yet that
such cuts will come to pass, but Meiggs said the request didn't
bode well -- and that if such cuts were enacted they would have
a devastating effect on instruction at the university.
"If a 5.5 percent budget
reduction actually is mandated, then probably around 85 percent
of the part-time, temporary faculty would be without work,"
Meiggs said. Such lay-offs would mean that the regular faculty
would be required to teach more classes -- presumably taking
time away from their scholarly activities -- or that fewer classes
would be offered.
At the same time, Richmond said
that the university is "under-administered," compared
to other universities, and that he would be looking to hire a
few more administrators -- as well as more tenure-track professors
-- next year. "It's certainly possible to get a bloated
administration," he said recently. "This institution
is not in that category at all."
Dr. Milt Boyd [photo at right] ,
chair of the biology department, said that he had not yet been
asked to submit a reduced budget for next year, but that he had
heard from the dean of his college that such a request was likely
forthcoming. Boyd said that his department was hard-pressed as
it is.
"I'm at the department
level," Boyd said. "I'm putting faculty in front of
students. I had a student come into my office and burst into
tears because he thought that he would not be able to enroll
in a class that he needed to graduate at the end of this semester.
"Someone would have to
do quite a presentation to convince me that, that instead of
more faculty in front of students we need more administrators."
For her part, Meiggs questioned
Richmond's spending priorities in the upcoming year; not only
the new administrators he said he would try to hire, but the
over $80,000 paid to Noel-Levitz and $250,000 to fund a study
of a new administration building on campus.
"While I think that these
things are important, it's hard to see how you can do them concurrently
when people are being laid off," she said.
"[Richmond] is a good man,
but we don't always see eye to eye. I do truly believe that his
ideas when he first came to Humboldt were very good ideas. It's
just that faculty are very concerned about the declining budget
and the effect that's having on their ability to do a good job."
Keeping an agile
mind
Many HSU professors
still see Richmond as they first saw him in 2002 -- as someone
who could shake the university out of the doldrums and toward
the front of the collegiate pack. Among them is Dr. Dave Hankin [photo at left] ,
chair of the fisheries department and head of the strategic plan
subcommittee that wrote the new recommendations on research and
scholarly activity. For Hankin, Richmond's solid backing of the
plan is evidence that the president is truly interested in making
the institution great.
"There is an element of
the campus that has been like this ever since I got here, that
thinks that people who do research do it at the expense of their
classes," Hankin said. "I think that's completely preposterous.
In fact, I would argue that people who don't engage in research
or scholarship or something like that, in some respects ought
not to be teaching. When I first got here, this situation was
way worse. For it to continue to go on is really silly."
As evidence that scholarship
and instruction complement, rather than rob from each other,
Hankin cites the case of Dr. Tim Mulligan, his colleague in the
fisheries department. Mulligan, who was named HSU's "Scholar
of the Year" in December, is by Hankin's account a great
instructor -- with student evaluation forms "like I've never
seen" -- but is also actively involved in getting his students
into the field and securing large grants for research projects.
Hankin said that from his point
of view, Mulligan's case was extraordinary but also typical of
great faculty members. A former HSU Professor of the Year himself,
Hankin said that it is essential for scholars to stay involved
in the problems and arguments that every discipline grapples
with over the years. It keeps the mind agile, and is the only
thing that keeps a scholar enthusiastic about his field. If a
professor isn't passing that enthusiasm onto his students, he
isn't passing on anything worthwhile.
"I couldn't in good conscience
teach if I couldn't do this stuff," he said. "I guess
it doesn't bother other people, but it would bother me."
Hankin's
view is probably the dominant one on campus. Though a significant
number of HSU faculty are disgruntled by the fact that Richmond
seems to be pulling them in many directions at once -- more time
in the classroom, more time in the field -- the dissenters are
far from unified. At the town hall meeting, for example, many
of the professors who argued that there was no problem with the
quality of teaching at the university were among the most renowned
scholars on campus. Stephen Cunha, who pleased the crowd in Goodwin
Forum with his verbal jabs at Vrem, is forever flitting off to
Burma or Central Asia to do fieldwork. Most of them would probably
be in favor of receiving a reduced teaching schedule to support
their research activities.
Richmond last week acknowledged
the tension on campus these days, as some faculty with long and
distinguished careers at the university begin to feel that things
are going the wrong way. But he didn't seem inclined to let his
reputation as a bridge-builder and all-around nice guy prevent
him from taking a stand.
"This institution has been
stable for a very long time, and I'm asking it to do things that
it hasn't before," Richmond said. "That's bound to
make some people concerned."
Milt Boyd, who is paying close
attention to his department's funding and wondering how he's
going to "put faculty in front of students," is one
such person. Boyd said that he agreed with Richmond's support
of the strategic plan. He thought that more attention and credit
for research and scholarship would benefit the campus.
When he was asked to grade Richmond
as he would grade his students, though, Boyd said that there
was only one possible answer.
"Incomplete," he said.
IN
THE NEWS | PUBLISHER | STAGE
DOOR | PREVIEW
| THE HUM | CALENDAR
Comments? Write a
letter!
© Copyright 2005, North Coast Journal,
Inc.
|