pathfindersbooks
Member since Jun 5, 2008
Recent Comments
Re: “No, Sister!”
"Wait a minute…..I’ve been corresponding with Wade Long who thinks he is really a witch!" Why not? You think you're really a journalist. The difference, once again, is that this isn't about me. The fact that you keep attacking me personally instead of discussing the subject only highlights the fact that you've lost faith in your own argument. That means you've simply lost.
Re: “No, Sister!”
"Wade, get your ego under control. I’m under no obligation to respond to the questions of someone who calls another “a dog”." Um, it's called "Journalistic Integrity" and you are under obligation to at least provide some sort of support for your accusations. You stated openly that vast untold throngs of people were offended by the Sisters of Perpetual Indulgence, but you couldn't produce a single one, or even grab a quote from one of them. And I didn't call you a dog - if you did on a soccer field what you just did here, you'd get tagged for "Flopping". So show a little integrity and produce one of these voiceless unseen victims of the Sisters. "You seem angry and a bit unstable Wade." This isn't about me, no matter how much you'd like to make it so. This is about your unsupportable accusations against the Sisters of Perpetual Indulgence. You know, those same accusations that make you seem angry and a bit unstable.
Re: “No, Sister!”
Why on earth would you appreciate support for such a bigoted, ignorant viewpoint? I notice you didn't have a single word of rebuttal or apology to all the people who pointed out the hateful ignorance of your little screel. I WAS right, and you were unable to produce all these throngs of people disgusted at the Sisters' performances. You CLAIM they exist, and you cannot produce a single one. That makes you a liar. "BTW, Wade, I’m a man. Dixon is a man’s name." Dixon is a dog's name. I have no idea what gender you are, and I don't care. You see, mature people don't make an issue out of things like that.
Re: “No, Sister!”
Funny Ms Sommers, you go on repeatedly and at length how just a wee touch of journalistic integrity on Ms Walters' part might have turned up untold thousands of people who were offended by the Sisters of Perpetual Indulgence, and that interviewing those (alleged) people would let everyone know just how ticked off the entire world (allegedly) is at them. Yet ... for all your bluster about Ms Walters' journalistic integrity, you don't seem to have done that wee touch of investigation yourself. You PROPOSE that there are HIV+ people out there who fled the AIDS Walk because of the Sisters, but you don't produce them. You PROPOSE there are women out there offended by the obvious parodic nature of the Sisters' burlesque, but you don't produce them. You claim there's some sort of dark hidden unsavoury underbelly to the Sisters of Perpetual Indulgence and their (alleged) unholy agenda, but you don't produce it. YOU should be able to do better.
Re: “Old Town Hunkers Down”
If you're looking for one of the new businesses, Pathfinders Books is one of them. They're in the back of Imperiale Square's courtyard at 2nd and D.
Re: “No, Sister!”
Oh my freaking god. "Dicks in Summer" Okay, that was the nuke. This is officially over. I'm laughing waaaaaay too hard.