Pin It

Parallel Crises 

Humboldt desperately needs housing but how it's built may determine the county's role in combating climate change

click to enlarge The Eureka City Council recently approved the multi-use Eureka Regional Transit and Housing Center (EaRTH Center) proposed to be built on the parking lots of Third and H Streets in Old Town Eureka.

City of Eureka Facebook

The Eureka City Council recently approved the multi-use Eureka Regional Transit and Housing Center (EaRTH Center) proposed to be built on the parking lots of Third and H Streets in Old Town Eureka.

If you've tried to find housing in the last few years, you know what a difficult task it is. Humboldt County property managers say local rental vacancy rates run between 0 and 3 percent — extreme, even in California, which has a roughly 4-percent vacancy rate statewide.

Buying a home in Humboldt is also cost-prohibitive for most people, with the median price for a single-family home coming in at $451,000, according to statistics published by the California Association of Realtors. Homes for sale in Humboldt also only stay on the market for an average of 12 days before they are snapped up, another indication of a significant housing shortage.

The reasons are multiple and include climate and wildfire refugees, as well people fleeing the city since COVID-19 enabled people to work from home. But the underlying issue is that demand for housing has outstripped the supply. The obvious answer is to build more housing, but that is a lot harder and more complicated than it seems.

"California housing has become the most expensive in the nation," states the preamble to Senate Bill 9, the Affordable Housing Act. "The excessive cost of the state's housing supply is partially caused by activities and policies of many local governments that limit the approval of housing, increase the cost of land for housing, and require that high fees and exactions be paid by producers of housing."

The state has stepped in with both sticks and carrots to get communities to increase their housing stocks. One such law is Senate Bill 9, which basically does away with single-family zoning. Under S.B. 9, property owners need only get a simple ministerial building permit to add a second home on their lot. Each of these two homes can also have an additional "granny flat" or be divided into duplexes, resulting in four housing units on a lot zoned for single-family use. Some California cities have resisted what they believe to be an illegal incursion into local control and are filing suit against the state for violating the California Constitution's legal designation for charter cities.

Several cities in the San Francisco Bay Area, meanwhile, have reported that almost no landowners are taking advantage of these loosened restrictions. Here in Humboldt, County Planning Director John Ford reported that his department had seen an "uptick" in building permits for accessory dwelling units but was not specific as to the numbers. Likewise, Eureka City Manager Miles Slattery expects there will be an increase in people wanting to increase the housing density on their properties because it will increase their value.

City and county planners are familiar with the state's Regional Housing Need Allocation (RHNA, pronounced ree-na). In 2019, the California Department of Housing and Community Development presented each individual county with a requirement to build a certain number of new housing units by 2027. While the state cannot require the county or city to actually construct or pay for the units, it establishes that local governments cannot prohibit such building through restrictive zoning codes, and requires they change their codes, if necessary. These code changes are supposed to be reflected in the Housing Element of the county or city's General Plan.

It is not easy to determine how the state comes up with RHNA numbers for each locality, but, according to Humboldt County Association of Governments (HCAOG) Senior Planner Oona Smith, it is a formula based on census population data and on the number of jobs a region offers.

The state wants 3,390 new housing units built in Humboldt by 2027. Of these, 829 must be affordable for very low-income households, 532 for low income, 613 for moderate income and the rest for above average income households. The figures are further broken down by HCAOG into allocations for the seven incorporated cities and the unincorporated areas of the county.

These RHNA numbers are supposed to be reflected in the Housing Element of the city or county's General Plan, which must also be updated periodically.

Failure to meet RHNA goals can result in difficulty in obtaining state grants. Compliance gives the jurisdiction "brownie points."

While there are different definitions of "affordability," most agencies feel that housing costs should not take up more than a third of a family's total income. For a family with a single wage earner, making $60,000 a year, that would be about $1,666 per month.

California, particularly under the Newsom administration, places a strong emphasis upon infill. There are two reasons for this: One is the protection of natural resources; the other is directly associated with climate change. The more miles people drive to work each day, the more emissions from their cars contribute to global warming. If jobs and housing are both available in the same area, theoretically, the number of vehicle miles traveled would be reduced, resulting in fewer greenhouse gas emissions.

In the past, Caltrans' primary objective was to keep traffic moving, both in towns and on the highways, with as little delay as possible, keeping air pollution to a minimum. Recently, this objective changed to reducing the total number of vehicle miles traveled, hopefully leading to a diminution of greenhouse gases. Plans for new development are supposed to reflect this transportation goal.

Humboldt has many limitations on where new housing can be built. To meet the RHNA requirements, new housing must be in areas that already have municipal services, such as public water and sewage treatment systems. That eliminates many of the more far-flung regions of the county. The California Coastal Commission limits what can be built near the coast. Forests, floodplains, marshlands and agricultural lands all have various degrees of legal protection. That leaves only one direction — upward.

"The city [of Eureka] is already built out, and that is why we are allowing people to build higher," said Slattery. "We are changing the zoning codes to allow higher buildings, and also to allow residential uses in areas where it could not previously happen."

In recent months, Humboldt residents have considered three different styles of urban development. In Eureka, city officials are considering building affordable housing on city-owned parking lots. This has resulted in pushback from local businesses, who fear that a lack of parking will discourage people from shopping, though Slattery does not think the loss of a few parking lots would harm the city's business community.

In Arcata, the city wants to re-zone a large swath of formerly industrial land that is now largely vacant and under-utilized. Known as the "Gateway Area Plan," a variety of buildings of all sizes would be constructed, including some as high as eight stories. Most would be for housing, but retail and light manufacturing would also be permitted. Roadways would be designed to encourage bicycling and walking, and the area would be enhanced by open green spaces.

In the Cutten area, which is under the county's jurisdiction, an 81-acre tract of land, the North McKay Ranch Project, is planned for a more traditional type of development — with 146 new single-family houses and 174 units in multi-family structures. Municipal services, such as water, sewer and gas lines, would be constructed, making the project eligible to meet RHNA goals. However, this would necessitate the clearing of forestland and is being opposed by a number of environmental groups, which have threatened to sue the county over it.

Each of these projects has its upsides and downsides. Although the Gateway Project seems to fit in with the environmental goals that many Arcatans espouse, some residents feel it would change Arcata's small-town rural atmosphere to one of a city, a change they resent.

Additionally, the Arcata Fire Department does not have the equipment to deal with high-rise buildings. Much of the land in Arcata's Gateway Area was used for industrial sites and may be polluted. Ground pollution can be expensive and difficult to clean up. As an example, a prime piece of Arcata real estate, located near the plaza, has stood empty for decades because after the building it supported burned down, the ground was found to be polluted. Some people also question the wisdom of building high-rises in an earthquake-prone area.

An even more serious problem has to do with sea-level rise. Arcata's wastewater treatment plant is, by necessity, close to Humboldt Bay, and will be vulnerable to inundation. While the city has plans to increase the capacity of the plant, it has not yet figured out when, where and how to move the facility, as the ocean moves in. Some residents feel Arcata should not be encouraging more growth until this problem is resolved.

Eureka is potentially facing a similar problem. According to Slattery, the city's wastewater treatment plant has plenty of additional capacity and can easily handle a lot more residential development, but he did not address the threat to the wastewater facility posed by sea level rise.

There are also project-level decisions beyond the questions of building up or out that determine their impacts on the climate crisis.

The five environmental groups that have threatened to sue the county if it approves the North McKay Ranch Project in Cutten, for example, say the county's environmental review violates the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). The consortium particularly dislikes the project's reliance on natural gas as an energy source, believing the project should rely entirely on electrical energy, for both health and climate reasons.

In contrast to much of the rest of the state, one issue that will not be a problem when it comes to housing development in Humboldt is drinking water. Humboldt Bay Municipal Water District General Manager John Friedenbach says even with a mega drought, there is enough water coming down the river from Ruth Lake to supply plenty of additional growth, both residential and commercial.

In the meantime, while citizens and policymakers hash out their differences, homeless people still camp in gulches and parks, while working-class families wonder what they will do if their landlord converts their home to a vacation rental. Cal Poly Humboldt plans on importing thousands of new students into Arcata and, if plans for an offshore wind farm go forward, massive industrial development could result on the peninsula and in Eureka, resulting in the need for even more housing.

Meanwhile, the climate crisis grows more ominous by the day, with each new scientific report indicating the window to reduce emissions in time to stave off global catastrophe is shrinking.

Clearly something must change but a great many questions still need to be answered.

Elaine Weinreb (she/her) is a freelance journalist. She tries to re-pay the state of California for giving her a degree in environmental studies and planning (Sonoma State University) at a time when tuition was still affordable.

Pin It

Tags: ,

Comments (4)

Showing 1-4 of 4

Add a comment

Subscribe to this thread:
Showing 1-4 of 4

Add a comment

About The Author

Elaine Weinreb

more from the author

Latest in News

Readers also liked…

  • 'A Brutal End'

    The Great Timber Strike of 1935 and lessons from our past
    • Sep 9, 2021
  • Through Mark Larson's Lens

    A local photographer's favorite images of 2022 in Humboldt
    • Jan 5, 2023


Facebook | Twitter

© 2023 North Coast Journal

Website powered by Foundation