Eureka Injustice
Member since Feb 20, 2018
Recent Comments
Re: “Clean, Sober, Homeless”
707 4991108
[email protected]
Re :Linda Stansberry agape house..
I am responding to your article written earlier this month regarding
your meeting with Ms LigiaGiovannoni and the Agape house.
Your article includes many mis-representations, some of which I would like to address
I am the legal owner of 2145 C St. in Eureka, and I along with my family were evicted in Nov 2013 due to slanderous and factitious statements by Ms Giovannoni. At the time I had been paying the Mortgage on my own and all of the Utility bills and Insurance were in my name alone.
You have stated incorrectly that our;
`relationship turned sour and Grabzky moved out
Ms Giovannoni moved out in 2011 and lived next door with Mr. jack Stevens until he evicted her for non payment of rent in late 2013. In over 2 years she never paid him a penny More importantly
I did not move out.
I was restrained from the house by the actions of Ms Giovannoni and her attorney Mr Rory Hanson who helped her compile her vicious slanders.
She changed her statements three or four times.
In fact our relationship ended shortly after Ms Giovannoni stopped her Bi-polar medication in 2010. She had not lived in the house since 2011 until instigating her crime in late 2013.
You have stated incorrectly that :
`LigiaGiovannoni thought she was doing the right thing.
She knew exactly what she was doing and thought that she would get away with it by using her large inheritance to corrupt the system and
pay to `fix matters in her favour.
As can be seen from the many emails; ( some enclosed with this correspondence ) she threatened to do what she eventually enacted
on many occasions.
You have stated incorrectly that
`LigiaGiovannoni struggled to make her mortgage payments.
Ms Giovannoni had inherited `over $200,000 from her father in 2012
and stated to HUMBOLDT COURTS on Oct 20th of 2015 that she was earning $49,000 per year from renting out my house.
As you have correctly stated, she had not paid the Mortgage for 21 months and paid no rent. She also did not pay Utility bills.
Along with her inheritance Ms Giovannoni may have in her possession more than $300,000, more than enough to pay the back Mortgage.
One can assume that some of this money is in Buenos Aires Argentina.
Ms Giovannoni has not paid taxes in more than 10 years.
YOUR ARTICLE informs us that;
Giovannoni declines to say where the rent money she took from her tenants went while she wasn't paying her mortgage,
Her intention is to build on her property in the
DELTA region north of Buenos Aires
Ms. Giovannoni hates the American government and blames them for the death of her sister in 1976.
She has no concern that her actions t have cost tax payers more than
2.3 million dollars and will likely exceed $17,000,000 by the time it is resolved in the higher courts.
You have stated incorrectly that when I moved out:
`she converted five of its six bedrooms to dormitories and began accepting women who needed shelter.
This is not a fact.
As can be confirmed by Captain Stevens and three officers of the Eureka precinct, Ms Giovannoni along with her boyfriend
Mr David Mcveigh continued growing cannabis plants throughout the house( against my wishes).
Only when this venture failed did she turn my house into a drug rehabilitation home.
You have stated incorrectly that:
`Giovannoni's tenants knew nothing about this.
I personally informed the tenants of this eventuality on the
27th of Jan 2017 when the house went up for auction.
I also informed them in person 3 weeks early and this conversation was recorded
on two go -pro cameras and on my Iphone..
AND you state;
the nine women who called Agape House home had 10 minutes to grab their belongings and then leave in the driving rain.
I do feel sorry for them BUT they were most certainly warned.
However I was given little time to collect my family possessions and have claimed to the IRS that I have lost more than $43.000 of personal property. None of that property is still in the house.
I have personally brought this matter to the Eureka police on more than 14 occasions. I have 4 case/CAD numbers.
I have been told by 7 officers and two Captains that it is not their concern and it is a civil matter.
I have brought this matter to the Sheriffs office on more than 9 occasions and have been told the same.
I have spoken to District attorney Wayne COX on a few occasions and have been instructed to get an attorney as it is not in their jurisdiction and they could not help.
I have written to
THE STAE BAR OF CALIFORNIA
THE COMMISSION OF JUDICIAL CONDUCT
THE IRS.
many times without receiving a modicum of help.
I have written to
THE JUSTICE DEPT
THE GRAND JURY
GOVERNOR JERRY BROWN
and many state and county representatives and received no help in resolving this matter nor have I been allowed to retrieve valuable property from the house within the four year period.
Some of these letters I will include with this document so you can be assured of the validity of what I write.
Your article states that:
She went to court several times to file paperwork challenging the legality of the mortgage system.
I personally without any assistance from Ms Giovannoni obtained through diligence and fortitude a modification of our loan which reduced the original payment of $2700 per month to $1868 per month.
This was in 2012 while she was living next door and paid nothing for the upkeep of the house.
Her statement is ridiculous, however her next comment is infact very true,,
`but says the corrupt nature of the court system which she says works in tandem with the corrupt banking system
She knows well that Eureka may have the most corrupt court system in the country which is how she managed to succeed for this long of a duration.
I was personally informed by two Judges in the smalll claims court that although the crime against me was apparent they would not over-rule a higher court Judge.
Transcripts would be available to confirm this.
They told me I should get an attorney but due to the fact that Ms Giovannoni had stolen my money and possessions and put me out of both of my HOME-BASED businesses I could not .
Due to her crime I now rely on food stamps and disability payments.
My family and I have been traumatised and displaced.
Your article goes on to say
~Giovannoni says these expenses alone often topped $1,000 a month.
This is not a fact and in addition she did not pay the bills for many months
the following and conclusive statement of your article is extremely hurtful.
"I'm sad for her," says Elliot. "She doesn't seem to be able to see the big picture.
No one needs to be` SAD for this woman, she saw the big picture 4 and a half years ago.
Re: “We Are Humboldt — All of Us”
We can not expect resolution in this case.
Until somebody stands up to the blatant corruption in the Humboldt courts
we can not expect any Justice for Josiah or any other Male citizen.
Re: “Can Humboldt County Solve Addiction?”
Just to repeat
The Agape House closed down on Friday Nov 10th. Ligia Giovannini was less than honest with her residence. They had no idea she was ill-managing funds and without warning, 13 residents were ordered evicted from their home. They are now homeless, left scrambling for a place to live. Specifics are fuzzy at this point, but the fact is these girls and the Assistant manager of the Agape House are without a place to live.
Linda was informed of this criminal activity and may not be aware that because of it ,
we have more homeless and more drug addiction. Is it a coincidence that we have the greatest problem with homelessness and the most corrupt courts in the United states.
Citizens of eureka are shocked and sickened by these criminal acts assisted by the courthouse. Journalists are afraid to write the truth which is shameful. Just saying.....
In the 1860's journalists risked their lives to report the truth about the Genocide and Massacres.
Re: “Arkley Emails Foreshadow Litigation over Tuluwat Island”
Arkly must be stopped..!!!!
For more than 150 years one tragic event has dominated the history of Native and foreigner relationships in Humboldt County.
The massacre of the WIYOT PEOPLES
On the night of 26 Feb 1860, a small group of settlers crossed sunbelt bay to avoid drawing attention from the nearby Eureka residents, the bulk of whom may not have condoned the killings , carried out primarily with hatchets clubs and knives.
The village of Tolowot or Tuluwat on Duluwat Island was the site of the spiritual if not the political center of the Wiyot people.
The had lived there for such a long time that they changed the topography , in part due to the process known as shell mounding.
They had survived from subsistence fishery management in the same location for
at least 9000 years.
Arcatas local news paper the `northern Californian, described the carnage that followed.
`Blood stood in pools on all sides; the walls of the huts were stained and the grass coloured red. Lying around were dead bodies of both sexes and all ages from the old man to the infant at the breast.
`Some had their heads SPLIT IN TWAIN by axes, others beaten into jelly with clubs, others pierced or cut to pieces with bowie knives. Some had almost reached the water when overtaken and butchered.
The vigilantes who called themselves the Humboldt Volunteers, second Brigade, had been formed in early February 1860 and had vowed to;
kill every peaceable Indian-man-women-and child.
About 150 peaceful Natives died that night. Almost all were women and children, as the men had left for Harvesting elsewhere.
They and Many others from the Wiyot tribe who were LIVING in different locations
were also slaughtered that week.
The Humboldt times reported
`The law works beautifully.. We hear of many others who are having them bound to suit.
A Boston Transcript correspondent visited Humboldt and described Indians
`being hunted for their children..
Mr. Hanson reported that Kidnapping of Indians had become `
`quite a business of profit , and I have no doubt is the foundation of the so-called Indian wars.
Thus began the Genocide in Humboldt and the sanctioning of the native slave trade,
an operation funded by the federal government and implemented by the
Humboldt court under Indian affairs officer George Hanson.
Mercifully in the following year Hanson was replaced by superintendent Austin Wiley the former editor of the Humboldt times, and
the Us army started to alter its genocidal policies.
The Hoopa Valley In dian Reservation was established.
Such investigations may be painful, but in the context of genocide, recording deaths also dignifies the slain and gives voice to the departed.
Can there be any question on who the Island belongs too.?
Re: “As Wiyot Prepare to Dance Again, Eureka Fumbles With Contrition”
Arkley must be stopped..!!!!
For more than 150 years one tragic event has dominated the history of Native and foreigner relationships in Humboldt County.
The massacre of the WIYOT PEOPLES
On the night of 26 Feb 1860, a small group of settlers crossed sunbelt bay to avoid drawing attention from the nearby Eureka residents, the bulk of whom may not have condoned the killings , carried out primarily with hatchets clubs and knives.
The village of Tolowot or Tuluwat on Duluwat Island was the site of the spiritual if not the political center of the Wiyot people.
The had lived there for such a long time that they changed the topography , in part due to the process known as shell mounding.
They had survived from subsistence fishery management in the same location for
at least 9000 years.
Arcatas local news paper the `northern Californian, described the carnage that followed.
`Blood stood in pools on all sides; the walls of the huts were stained and the grass coloured red. Lying around were dead bodies of both sexes and all ages from the old man to the infant at the breast.
`Some had their heads SPLIT IN TWAIN by axes, others beaten into jelly with clubs, others pierced or cut to pieces with bowie knives. Some had almost reached the water when overtaken and butchered.
The vigilantes who called themselves the Humboldt Volunteers, second Brigade, had been formed in early February 1860 and had vowed to;
kill every peaceable Indian-man-women-and child.
About 150 peaceful Natives died that night. Almost all were women and children, as the men had left for Harvesting elsewhere.
They and Many others from the Wiyot tribe who were LIVING in different locations
were also slaughtered that week.
The Humboldt times reported
`The law works beautifully.. We hear of many others who are having them bound to suit.
A Boston Transcript correspondent visited Humboldt and described Indians
`being hunted for their children..
Mr. Hanson reported that Kidnapping of Indians had become `
`quite a business of profit , and I have no doubt is the foundation of the so-called Indian wars.
Thus began the Genocide in Humboldt and the sanctioning of the native slave trade,
an operation funded by the federal government and implemented by the
Humboldt court under Indian affairs officer George Hanson.
Mercifully in the following year Hanson was replaced by superintendent Austin Wiley the former editor of the Humboldt times, and
the Us army started to alter its genocidal policies.
The Hoopa Valley In dian Reservation was established.
Such investigations may be painful, but in the context of genocide, recording deaths also dignifies the slain and gives voice to the departed.
Can there be any question on who the Island belongs too.?
Re: “Correction/clarification:”
Karen Paz Dominguez attempted to speak the truth and was quickly reprimanded.
We the citizens of EUREKA REQUEST that the Journal apologize for all of the inaccurate articles
and errors of fact.
Is it not time to report the truth??
Your silence in this matter is not appreciated..
I am writing to inform you of a situation that I believe is occurring in the Eureka Superior courts on a much too frequent basis.
I have a legal and moral duty to reveal what I assume is blatant judicial misconduct and attorney conspiracies.
This aberration of justice not only destroys innocent families, it costs taxpayers many millions of dollars while providing only a few thousand dollars to the systemic corrupt practice.
My case alone is expected to cost citizens over 2 million dollars once it has reached the higher courts. More importantly, it can only soil the reputation of Eureka and the justice system.
The matter that I refer to is unequivocally one of the most pressing concerns that Eureka faces today. Eurekas reputation, from the genocide of the 1860s to the ecological devastation that followed, has never really been able to surface from the cesspool of historic facts.
Therefore I believe it is unquestionably irresponsible for individuals to milk the system for their own benefit, leaving tax payers to foot the bill. In addition, the reputation of these `kangaroo courts does little to promote our city or create trust among citizens. From the dozen or so conversations I have had with members of the law enforcement community, I have this belief.
The police and sheriff are highly opposed to this unjustifiable arrangement, and subsequently the judicial orders that they are forced to follow. To implement inhuman actions against innocent victims causes a professional conflict.
From my research, it would appear that Eureka California provides an extreme example of this type of sanctioned `domestic terrorism perhaps more than anywhere in the country.
The Commission on Judicial Performance will reprimand a judge who takes an early paycheck but is hesitant to investigate a potential `kids for cash scandal even when it is clear that the emperor has no clothes.
We, as men do not have equal protection under the laws as stated in the 14th Amendment. The loop-holes built into the complicated legal language give rise to misinterpretation and obstruction of justice and allows criminals to get away with the most henous crimes.
I ask for your assistance on behalf of my family and the citizens of Eureka to investigate my allegations to the best of your abilities. I will continue to voice my concerns as is my duty as a citizen of the United States.
Just about every aspect of the family law system has an inherent predisposition to treat you as a threat to your family. Especially if you are a male.
While the law has very good intentions, it is being misused regularly. The most egregious abuse is the false allegation of domestic violence that is, one party flat-out lies about the conduct of the other. The more insidious abuse is the allegation of domestic violence as a tactic to get the upper hand in divorce proceedings that is, the party doesn't outright lie but makes the allegation with the hope that the court will buy it. The courts do buy it, all the time!
Judges most definitely have adopted a better-safe-than-sorry approach whenever presented with an allegation of domestic violence. After all, you may be the next O.J.
But wait... it gets worse. You can be hauled into family court with no notice and no preparation to defend yourself against an ex parte allegation of domestic violence. Whether or not you dodge this bullet, you'll be back in court 21-days later to defend yourself again. But even if there is scant evidence of any threat, you are likely to lose since the burden of proof is so low and the risk, in the court's eyes, is so high.
What does losing mean? Most likely you will be immediately removed from your home, restrained from seeing or speaking to your children, and lose all your possessions until a later (usually much later) trial. In the meantime you are now a perpetrator of domestic violence in the eyes of the law. Your name will be registered as such throughout the state and you will have a three-year restraining order against you
In the wake of the Simpson case, AB 840 (2000) added section 3044 to the Family Code, which makes it very easy to use restraining orders as a tactical weapon in custody battles. Specifically, the change allows restraining orders which are given out in assembly-line fashion with little or no evidence required to be considered a finding of abuse, thereby making the restrained person ineligible for joint custody of the children.
AB 840 was opposed by a very credible group, including the Family Law Section of the State Bar, California Judges Association, California Judicial Council, among many others.
They recognized that the change proposed by the bill would open Pandora's Box and leave the door open for abuse of the restraining order process in divorce and custody proceedings.
California AB 99 amended Family Code section 6361(b) to provide that Domestic Violence Protective Orders issued in family law proceedings can be extended for a maximum duration of 5-years (effective January 1, 2006). Though AB 99 passed, it was again opposed by a significant group that included the California Public and most of the Judicial bodies.