disclosures
Member since Mar 15, 2014
Recent Comments
Re: “Candidates Spar at first DA Debate”
Is it true that on or about 8/22/1997 Dollison was hired to file a bankruptcy petition, the Cruz matter. Dollison cashed the two checks he was given by Cruz. Dollison never returned any of the Cruz telephone calls, and never filed the bankruptcy paperwork. Dollison abandoned his client, moved out of his office without contacting any of his clients. Dollison was found guilty of willful failure to communicate with his clients and to return unearned retainer fees. These are more acts of moral turpitude.
Re: “Candidates Spar at first DA Debate”
On or about 09/24/1997 Dollison intentionally prepared a FALSE Notice of Ruling for a Motion to Set Aside a Default Judgment obtained against his client, Ms. Maisterra. Dollison never filed the motion. Dollison then forged the signature of the Plaintiff’s attorney, Anthony Head, on the FALSE Notice of Ruling for the Motion to Set Aside the Default Judgment as well as the Proof of Service, which Dollison never filed. Dollison was paid by the client to perform the promised work, and was found to have never earned the fees and failed to return the funds. The State Bar Court found that Dollison had committed not less than 6 acts of dishonesty in this single case. But there is so much more!
Re: “Candidates Spar at first DA Debate”
Allan Dollison's was disciplined by the California State Bar for stealing from his clients. Check out the California State Bar web site and read the details. He is not fit to be the District Attorney. Moral turpitude is a fatal character defect and one which proves he is unfit to seek or hold the highest law enforcement office in Humboldt County
Re: “Answering the critics”
Dollison has learned nothing from his past illegal conduct. His recent departure from the Humboldt District Attorney's Office was not voluntary, unless you agree that "be fired or resign" is voluntary. What Dollison did in the Adams trial was not only lie to Judge miles, but knowingly commit prosecutorial misconduct. If this matter is submitted to the State Bar Dollison would once again likely find himself disbarred. It should be noted that any citizen can refer this case to the State Bar for consideration of opening an investigation. That is exactly what is being prepared as this is being written. Dollison has gotten away with far more than most lawyers who participate in the type of conduct he has repeatedly done.