constitution defender 
Member since Sep 7, 2017


Stats

Friends

  • No friends yet.
Become My Friend Find friends »

Recent Comments

Re: “Resisting Reparations

Terry Escarda. You failed to mention the Indian tribes lost the wars to the United States Armed Forces as provided-for by the United States Constitution! Time to get over events more than 130-years ago.
Secondly, provide the historical facts you claim and not your unsupported opinion: " by murder, butchery, deceit, and theft."
Lastly, you did not disprove any of my Constitution-based truths.

1 like, 11 dislikes
Posted by constitution defender on 09/07/2017 at 5:05 PM

Re: “Resisting Reparations

Mr. Robin P. Arkley II is correct to demand answers to his questions of public servants who allegedly are giving away public land to a faux "Indian tribe" under what state Constitutional authority?

This article is an astonishing piece of a deplorable lack of journalist curiosity regarding U.S./State citizens with Indian ancestry/race since The Indian Citizenship Act of 1924! That single Indian Citizenship Act of 1924, made null all previous common law-state and federal-including Presidential Executive Orders, Commerce Clause and Treaty Clause alleged Indian Treaties (if any U.S. Senate confirmed Indian treaties actually existed pre-1924 Citizenship) regarding U.S./State citizens with Indian ancestry/race so often touted by politicians and Indian advocates as being legitimate law.
And yet, politicians and MSM continue to perpetuate willful blindness to the Constitutional absurdity that Congress, Presidents/Governors, Initiatives and Referendums can make distinguishable the capacities, metes and boundaries of a select group of U.S./State citizens with Indian ancestry/race post citizenship.
The United States Constitution makes for no provisions for:
1. Indian sovereign nations. None of the asserted tribes possess any of the attributes of being a sovereign nation: a. No U.S. Constitution recognition b. No international recognition c. No fixed borders d. No military e. No currency f. No postal system g. No passports h. et al
2. Treaties with its own constituency
3. Indian reservations whereby a select group of U.S./State citizens with Indian ancestry/race reside exclusively and to the exclusion of all others, on land-with rare exception-that is owned by the People of the United States according to federal documents readily available on-line that notes rights of renters as occupancy and use by these distinguished U.S./State citizens with Indian ancestry/race only with the land owned by the People of the United States.
4. Recognition of Indian citizenship asserted by various tribes. There is no international/U.S. Constitution recognition of Indian citizenship as there is no nation-state from which citizenship is derived.
A simple question for politicians and MSM to answera question so simple, it is hard:
Where is the proclamation ratified by the voters of the United States that amends the Constitution to make the health, welfare, safety and benefits of a select group of U.S./State citizens distinguishable because of their Indian ancestry/race?

0 likes, 11 dislikes
Posted by constitution defender on 09/07/2017 at 12:49 PM

Extra Extra!

Make sure you're signed up so we can inbox you the latest.

  • Weekly Update (Thursday)
  • Events This Weekend (Thursday)

Login to choose
your subscriptions!

Favorite Places

  • None.
Find places »

Saved Events

  • Nada.
Find events »

Saved Stories

  • Nope.
Find stories »

Custom Lists

  • Zip.
 

© 2017 North Coast Journal

Website powered by Foundation

humboldt