It is always challenging to write something that may be controversial. Consequently, it is really rewarding when someone as informed as Peter DeAndreis supports your effort. There are usually so many limits on free-expression that most of these things go unsaid. Thank you, Peter, for helping me to feel at least somewhat accurate.
My parents insisted that integrity was a virtue. How did it become out-dated? Perhaps 2 of the Supervisors could've been expected to sell-out, but the other two are more of a mystery. Their willingness to compromise themselves for favorable consideration by those that bought them their office should be a lifetime embarrassment.Their ravaging of the GPU contradicts their promotion of "environmental safeguards." Their shift from "public guardians" to "the public be damned" will reverberate for years to come. I hope they don't sleep well at nite.
Re: “Dysfunctional??”
George Clark has again hit the nail on the head. If good sense were all that is needed to guide our community, Clark would be a Supervisor. But since corruption, of which Ulansey is intimately involved, puts sycophants in Supervisor roles, we have supervisors who put favoritism first, and the community second.