Joel,
Methinks you doth protest too much. In fact, a bit of reading comprehension would fix what ails you.
You are the living embodiment of what is wrong with the Journal, showing open contempt towards those with a differing viewpoint, while unwilling to take constructive criticism.
Other than the last paragraph, I agree completely with the poster at 6:43. I don't see anything in the 6:43 post calling for publishing "pieces that I approve of", I see a call for a bit of objectivity, a showing of both sides of an issue, instead of just blatantly tearing down and dismissing out of hand sides of issues the journal editorially disagrees with and presenting that as hard hitting news.
I challenge you to go back and read the posts on this thread, particularly those from Thirdeye as well as the aforementioned post at 643.
Then when you respond, try and use a little thought instead of your presupposed witty snarky rejoinders.
0 likes, 0 dislikes
Posted by
pdidnt
on 10/22/2009 at 2:05 PM
Extra Extra!
Make sure you're signed up so we can inbox you the latest.
Re: “Just a Moment”
Joel, Methinks you doth protest too much. In fact, a bit of reading comprehension would fix what ails you. You are the living embodiment of what is wrong with the Journal, showing open contempt towards those with a differing viewpoint, while unwilling to take constructive criticism. Other than the last paragraph, I agree completely with the poster at 6:43. I don't see anything in the 6:43 post calling for publishing "pieces that I approve of", I see a call for a bit of objectivity, a showing of both sides of an issue, instead of just blatantly tearing down and dismissing out of hand sides of issues the journal editorially disagrees with and presenting that as hard hitting news. I challenge you to go back and read the posts on this thread, particularly those from Thirdeye as well as the aforementioned post at 643. Then when you respond, try and use a little thought instead of your presupposed witty snarky rejoinders.