Comment Archives: stories: News: News Blog

Re: “EPD Retracts Plans for Homeless Meal Voucher System

I find it absolutely disgusting that EPD would even consider a program that uses starvation as a punishment tool. Can you say, "obvious human rights violation" boys and girls? But then again, EPD has quite the reputation for human rights violations.

Posted by WhoAreThesePeople? on 07/27/2017 at 6:11 PM

Re: “'Not the Norm': HSU Students, Faculty Speak out on Racism

I was diagnosed with HepB 3 months ago and was devastated by the news. I have been ill and sore for over 10 years, with no one being able to figure out what was wrong with me. It was always written off as a virus or infection. Then 2 years ago the severe muscle cramps started. I had them from scalp to toes, and it was when they ran the full spectrum of tests to figure the cramps out, that they discovered the HepB along with severe Vitamin D deficiency, which I link to the HepB. I was so tired and nauseous and in constant pain. I am just sick and tired of feeling sick and tired!!nothing was really working to help my condition.I went off the Sebivo (with the doctors knowledge) and started on hepatitis B herbal formula i ordered from Health Herbal Clinic, my symptoms totally declined over a 5 weeks use of the hepatitis B virus natural herbal formula the disease is totally reversed!! Visit there website www. healthherbalclinic. net

Posted by Bonnie Klein on 07/27/2017 at 5:07 PM

Re: “Online Fortuna Fire Comments Spark Controversy

Holy shit, tell your kids to stop giving a fuck about the internet, stop staring at screens all day yourselves. Teachers, politicians, media reps, PARENTS are setting the worst example possible then scratching their heads over why internet commentary is as it is. Get the fuck over that bullshit, retards...youre literally retarded, retarding your own mental growth and maturity, and turning out retarded kids by example. Next thing you know your kid will grow up to be a hypersensitive idiot.

Posted by What do you expect? on 07/26/2017 at 7:54 AM

Re: “Online Fortuna Fire Comments Spark Controversy

I agree that the firefighters shouldn't have to read the comments and the comments should also remain.
It is all still better than the days when living in a small community without plains and cars when all there was was ink and gossip for info and public mobs...oh wait, maybe that led to more empathy? Don't think so.

0 likes, 1 dislike
Posted by Noyb on 07/23/2017 at 10:43 AM

Re: “Online Fortuna Fire Comments Spark Controversy

reynard, more likely i think he may be have been unfamiliar w/how the anonymous commenters on the internet work. especially those who are always going to be there with a bad attitude and a bunch of blather, no matter what the topic.

i'm positive mr. Winburn is too familiar with & being honest in his assessment of how his personnel feel and the toll paid even without the bs that some will throw out.

please, fortuna firefighters, know for certain - ignorant written comments directed at you were made by those who chose being anonymous for a good reason - they lack strength of character and have little ability to deal with being told by their peers their machinations are without merit. have they ever earned a pat on the back?

anonymous commenters are hiding in shadows, throwing shit and fanning embers & their egos (no matter what the web site).
--- every firefighter wears their name in huge bold lettering on their back, a firefighter must check their ego at the door of an emergent task so as to get that job done safely, not as one man but as a team for the overall good of all.
firefighter don't look for pat on the back for the job done with great valor.
i pity these miserable commenters - they do prove they have too much to say concerning that which they do not & can not know.

6 likes, 1 dislike
Posted by judi on 07/22/2017 at 11:36 PM

Re: “Online Fortuna Fire Comments Spark Controversy

This is interesting. I can understand and support Winburn's standing, but the press also. It's neither that is causing this conflict, it's the public comments. What I don't understand and find hard to accept, are the toxic comments and opinions of people that are broadcast and can be hard to dismiss on the receiving end. And a lot of the time, the 'opinions' or remarks are not from a knowledgeable stance but personal & biased opinion without all the facts. Sometimes it's best to say nothing at all!!

9 likes, 1 dislike
Posted by Joyce Radelich on 07/22/2017 at 1:21 PM

Re: “Online Fortuna Fire Comments Spark Controversy

Winburn is clearly unfamiliar with how the internets work. Also the First Amendment.

6 likes, 5 dislikes
Posted by Reynard on 07/22/2017 at 12:00 PM

Re: “EPD Retracts Plans for Homeless Meal Voucher System

We would modify ours, if it is even feasible, to fit the needs and capabilities of our community. We're just trying to control behavior, reduce crime and disorder problems, and improve the safety and beauty of our Old Town area (and the rest of the city) through creative crime fighting that is firm when needed but fair. Think outside the box and find other options beyond just enforcement. You sound interested. Why don't you help us find a solution? Contact our Homeless Programs Manager Lynette Mullen (lmullen@ci.eureka.ca.gov) if you've got a better idea or want to help us find one.

Interim Chief Watson

2 likes, 0 dislikes
Posted by SW on 07/20/2017 at 3:32 PM

Re: “EPD Retracts Plans for Homeless Meal Voucher System

I find this interesting in that the program in Santa Cruz that Watson talks about has not started yet so there is no way to know if it is a good idea or not. The Santa Cruz program is believed to cost around $400,000 this year. They closed the emergency shelter because of a short fall of $600,000. The shelter not only provided a place for people to sleep but showers, meals and mail service. Something is wrong here.

"Watson said his team was exploring a different approach similar to that implemented by a nonprofit in Santa Cruz, which recruits homeless people as volunteers for beautification projects, rewarding the effort with gift certificates for laundry or transportation needs."

Posted by Keith McHenry on 07/20/2017 at 10:12 AM

Re: “EPD Retracts Plans for Homeless Meal Voucher System

Homeless need and we need to treat them as INDIVIDUALS. We won't diminish the numbers unless we treat them as the individuals that they are. Relying on religious organizations (with agendas, even when hidden) should be ILLEGAL. SOME homeless would benefit from community service and volunteering OTHERS are :
1. suffering and in need of R&R, mental health care etc. WE DON"T ASK THOSE WITH SIGNIFICANT PHYSICAL issues like cancer to volunteer WHILE fighting the disease yet we subject those with mental health problems to higher expectations than the general public who does not volunteer especially at random ..they volunteer if and when and for what they choose.
2. and/or needing to recoup and then need to spend all of their time finding ways to survive ..housing, work or whatever. Looking for work is a full-time job!! Especially a livable wage when you are over 50!

Volunteerism is great if you are retired AND don't have to work or have a partner who supports you or a family inheritance or whatever.

1 like, 0 dislikes
Posted by Noyb on 07/20/2017 at 9:49 AM

Re: “State Conducting Sweeping Investigation of DHHS's Handling of Child Abuse Reports

sureno gang members of vagos vgs 13 are corrupting monterey county cps / fcs in monterey county i can prove are employed by this county ive got pictures transmissions emails and am a victim of this corruption something needs to be done here!

Posted by Jk Puga on 07/20/2017 at 12:53 AM

Re: “UPDATED: Chief Mills' Last Day Set for July 21

IF only everybody knew what really happened.
The night Tommy died the officers were under the control of Sgt. Stephens, The events reported were inaccurate and misleading. The police claim Tommy had a confrontation with a person that drove up driving a dark colored Ford truck. I seen the persons statement, there was never a confrontation between the driver and Tommy to justify such a concern. During the trial Sgt. Stephens sat with Linfoot at the defense table. I watched Stephens texting on his cell phone, most of the time holding his phone in his lap just under the table. I couldn't help but to think that he must have thought the rules of the courtroom did not apply to him or he was above any consequences. Every elected officials have the ability to do what is right and what's expected of them, Eureka City's Council has the same ability. This is not an isolated instance, there's a serious threat to the welfare and safety to the people in Eureka. The Mayor, is a former EPD officer, he has not taken a stand to protect the people in the community. Members of the city council, have delegated their responsibilities, they have not acted within the scope of their authority. When police officers or elected officials abandon or abuse their power, we are all put in danger.
I have always admired and respect law enforcement, the death of Tommy has not changed that. Unfortunately, I assumed that all officers are honest so the ones that are not don't take their position very seriously. The officers illegal and unethical actions were a state violation of Tommy's individual constitutional rights, law-enforcement are here to protect us not jeopardize our lives.
That night Tommy was killed, the officers operational plan was based on an unreliable tip Stephens received from some girl walking down the street late at night. Stephens was the first officer to confront Tommy. Tommy and his cousin and his cousins wife had returned home after they celebrated Tommys cousins birthday, yes Tommy and his cousin were drinking but they did the responsible thing and made arrangements to have a designated driver. Stephens pulled up on Tommy in the dark, just after midnight started yelling and pointing a gun at him. Tommy was standing up on his porch, posting to Facebook, his Facebook timeline shows him texting at 12:25am thanking his cousins wife for a good time and again at 12:27am Tommy was shot at 12:30am.
Stephens stated as he commanded Tommy to "Come Down Here Now" and "Put Your Hands Up" Stephens claimed Tommy showed resistance, but Tommy did not, he put his hands up, stepped off the porch and started walking down to the officer. Just because Tommy was asking, "what's going on?" "why are you doing this to me?" "what did I do?" Questions are not acts of resistance. Linfoot describes the encounter as a fishing expedition. It's my belief the officers provoked and instigated the altercation with McClain the officers actions were unprovoked and lacked provocation. Linfoot said everyone out there was saying the same thing, there was no conflicting demands being made which he knows can confuse the situation. It was very specific "Keep Your Hands Up" Stephens, Harkness and McElroy backed up his story. Harpham asked... where was Thomas located? Linfoot answers, He was just walking in a straight pathway off of the porch, he just continued to walk straight.
Linfoot states he was comfortable with Tommy's actions, he was doing what he was instructed to do.
Officer Linfoots actions were excessive and performed with a deliberate indifference to the circumstances. Law enforcement officers must take into account the totality of the circumstances. The objective factor is to determine the reasonableness of force. Tommy McClain did not commit any violation or offense, he wasn't wanted for any contravention or malefaction, he did not attempt to resist or evade apprehension. Mr. McClain was cooperative and responded to the verbal commands, the length Tommy walked as Stephens commanded him to "Come Down Here Now" the was a significant distance and showed a willingness to comply. The officers vehicles are equipped with Watch Sentinel Surveillance System, albeit it does not show the accrual shooting Tommy is up in his yard out of the camera's view. The video taken from Sergeant Stephens car will show, Linfoot barreling around the corner from the west side, he jumps out of his quad car pulls his firearm and points it in the direction where Tommy McClain was standing. The audio from Linfoot's car has confirmed all the officers simultaneously yelling conflicting commands such as get down, get down hear right now. Tommy slightly lowered his hands and hesitated but quickly bringing them back up again as the officers yelled even louder "keep your hands up, "keep your hands up, . The last commands heard on the audio is the voice of officer Linfoot yelling "Get Down" and another officer yelling "stop."stop" stop" during trial Mr. Galipo asked Linfoot if he recognize the voice that yelled "Get Down" Linfoot stated he believed it was his voice he heard.
Blaming Tommmy for dropping his hand is a ridiculous excuse for Linfoots for own actions. Mills concluded that the utilization of force was justified and dismissed all inopportune police conduct. But the investigation was predicated on fallacious information that was propitious to his officers and the department. The outcome of the investigation was reached from a plenarily partialness conclusion by consummately ignoring the facts that the officer's own temerarious or deliberate conduct during the initial contact with Tommy unreasonably created a situation, that evidently ended the life of Tommy James McClain. EPD Ronald Harpham labeled the death of Tommy justified homicide. A mistake is never justified and Linfoots intentions to shoot Tommy on the ground was not a mistake. Tommy's death certificate says, he was in altercation but all he was doing was standing outside in his yard..........
Sgt. Stephens might not have killed Tommy, but he certainly lacks integrity by not coming forward with the truth, completely disregarded any concern for the Publics Safety. When it comes to law-enforcement standing agents these types of wrong doings is more important then defending them.

Posted by jamiyssalinn on 07/18/2017 at 9:13 AM

Re: “UPDATE: Fortuna City Manager Arrested for Second DUI

Maybe the conservative little town of Fortuna ought to forbid the sale of alcohol within city limits. You know, sort of like the cannibis ban.

Posted by Toni Brockington on 07/16/2017 at 8:18 AM

Re: “UPDATE: Budget Committee Reverses Trump's Tsunami System Cuts

When was the last significant tsunami in Humboldt? Does anyone know? It seems like our bay has a very different and favorable configuration than Crescent City.

1 like, 0 dislikes
Posted by uri driscoll1 on 07/13/2017 at 4:59 PM

Re: “Eureka Police Seek New Leverage Against Homeless on Third Street

6 years ago, I was homeless in Eureka. My tent was by the bay, my food was from miss Betty and free meal. My clothes were from the free store. I saw the drugs, alcohol, and crime from the inside. I also saw the anguish and the pain the homeless were experiencing at how they were being treated. Drug and alcohol abuse, and some mental disibilties are made worse if those suffering are abused more. I got housed because I achieved stability by creating a drug and alcohol free homeless camp in Berkeley. I suggest that if you allow the homeless to help themselves in a responsibly run camp, you will help some. After seven months in Berkeley, The Poor Tour has not had one problem. The homeless involved understand the importance of The Poor Tour as an example of how to do it. The camp has cost the city zero money, and has wide community support. Over twenty saved enough money to house themselves, or move on. To help the homeless, the city needs get them stable. Stability means no hours of operation, no need to ever have your gear on you, and the ability to come and go as you please.

It's horribly cold and wet in Eureka. Not at all a good place to be homeless.

4 likes, 2 dislikes
Posted by Mike Zint on 07/11/2017 at 1:12 AM

Re: “Tent Cities: An Expert's Opinion

This expert says, "Keep track of where the semi-permanent people go that did not move into housing. Outreach needs to follow up with them daily for at least the next month and work on other options to living outdoors." The fatal problem is other options. Eureka, Humboldt, California all have a severe shortage of affordable housing. In response some have chosen to live in tents or self-made structures. This is the "problem". Why are we spending so much time and energy on "sweeps", "clean-ups" and "addressing" camps?

"Don't make tent cities a possible solution, regardless of a lack of existing shelter options"? What then, force people into the Mission or similar non-solution? Why is a legal camp not an alternative to opening another shelter?

"Do not try to arrest your way out of it or damage/take peoples belongings as a tough love approach to resolving the tent city." Eureka Police Department may have refused to do this, but individual officers and City workers have done exactly that, or simple damaged tents to make them unusable. And though there are few arrests for camping, there are many tickets written that later become warrants for failure to appear.

And what is the Court's response? For some it is summary probation with the condition of "obey all laws". How is that possible for someone that does not have housing? I told a person to go back and talk to the conflict counsel assigned to the case. The answer was that the state and city have said camping is illegal; others manage out there without getting ticketed, you were sleeping in a doorway, find somewhere else. The officer there when the person's camp was cleared told me some people have to hit rock bottom before accepting help. I didn't tell him that I was told by a social worker that no matter how great the service, a high success rate only comes with the desire to participate.

"The issue is economic poverty." And what do we do in the meantime? Clear camps and don't let them reestablish? It was a textbook clearing of the Marsh, and now over a year without a "limited enforcement area" (to avoid having a legal camp). Still no solution to economic poverty, still a housing shortage. Still poor people sitting on sidewalks and sleeping under bushes and on doorsteps. Now there are people who decided Betty Chinn's stored tents and sleeping bags should be given to those they were intended for. While there they took things intended for others. Betty didn't deserve that, those who depend on St. Vinnie's didn't deserve to have it shut down, the person who got the first no sitting ticket didn't deserve that, the woman trying to contact her social worker didn't deserve to be politely told to move-on eight times in one day. I have heard people without housing refer to jail as three meals and a bed. Now what, Mr. De Jong?

The City and County have a Homeless Strategies and Implementation plan. It quotes the United States Interagency Council on Homelessness, "The forced dispersal of people from encampment settings is not an appropriate solution or strategy, accomplishes nothing toward the goal of linking people to permanent housing opportunities, and can make it more difficult to provide such lasting solutions to the people who have been sleeping and living in the encampment." On the other hand, "a legal encampment creates costs which can prevent funding from being directed to supporting and creating permanent housing and service options." When will the costs of not having a legal option for those willing to accept living in a tent be considered?

1 like, 0 dislikes
Posted by janelle on 07/10/2017 at 10:05 AM

Re: “Eureka Police Seek New Leverage Against Homeless on Third Street

Location...location...location...move the food dish. Move it outside the house if you don't want to Look at the mess all day, every day.
Move St. Vincent's to the newly empty Kmart. Fence that massive parking lot in.

1 like, 3 dislikes
Posted by Kirsten on 07/10/2017 at 7:17 AM

Re: “Coroner Identifies Man Pulled From Humboldt Bay

R.I.P., Shane

1 like, 0 dislikes
Posted by Janice T. on 07/09/2017 at 10:32 AM

Re: “Eureka Police Seek New Leverage Against Homeless on Third Street

The time is long overdue to dispose of the enablers:
1. Betty Chinn
2. St. Vincent de Paul Society in Eureka
3. Andrew Mills (he's on his way to Santa Cruz - thank you for taking him, Santa Cruz)
4. Much of Humboldt County's population that maintains permissive attitudes about the use of alcohol, prescription and street drugs. When Eureka Natural Foods boasts of the "tap room" in their McKinleyville store, it is an unmistakable indicator of how relaxed many people in Humboldt County are about using (and often abusing) alcohol.

Disclosure: Since January of this year, I have worked every week with the homeless population in Humboldt County. I can empirically state that they are a group largely comprised of people committed to taking advantage wherever they can, spewing their ill-will toward others, and destroying property wherever they can. Until the enablers are shut down, the homeless population will find an enticing welcome mat in Humboldt County. Disgusting.

12 likes, 7 dislikes
Posted by vkqw4721 on 07/08/2017 at 2:57 PM

Re: “Eureka Police Seek New Leverage Against Homeless on Third Street

" it looked like a neighborhood people had given up on.
No, Cap'n... it's PEOPLE (you know, humans- like you and me) that people have given up on.

I was in Seattle recently, and I saw homeless people. They have respect for their city and its people. They pick up litter and throw it in the trash. They panhandle, but not in your face. They say 'please' and 'thank you'.
Some of them steal, but so do bankers and Naomi Judd. They have problems with drugs and alcohol. They have pasts.
The difference between here and there? Seattle feeds, clothes, and respects its people. They can take a shower. They can wash their clothes. They can sleep at night, sit in a park, share a joint, walk their dog- without police harassment.
Another 'move-along' campaign won't help the situation any more than the last one did. Helping them won't create more problems, but harassing people with nothing left to lose is unwise. But the mayor and the police want the problems to grow, so they can ask for more funding.
And where does that funding come from? You. And me. Hate and greed. Us and them. Haves and have-nots. These ideals make up the culture of our lawmakers and the street gang that enforces them.

Such a 'Christian' society we have here. I bet your Master Satan is proud.

8 likes, 12 dislikes
Posted by WhoAreThesePeople? on 07/08/2017 at 1:38 PM

© 2017 North Coast Journal

Website powered by Foundation

humboldt