At a public meeting at the River Lodge in Fortuna on Dec. 15, Piercy fire commissioner Jeff Hedin questioned why a recently released Draft EIR (DEIR) does not mention emergency first responders. Highway 101 in Southern Humboldt and Northern Mendocino is served almost exclusively by volunteer fire departments; Hedin asked how they would be expected to respond to a potentially increased number of accidents in the narrow corridor. Caltrans recently dropped the speed limit from 40 to 35 m.p.h. in sections of the grove, “but the truckers and the tourists don’t even notice the speed-limit reduction,” Baleme alleged. “There’s safety only as long as the CHP is on either side of the grove, writing tickets. As soon as they’re gone, it gets crazy again. I don’t have a problem with the big trucks, but I don’t think the road can handle it — I think they either need to do much more work, or not do it at all.”
Paradoxically, in this case there’s agreement between a business owner and an environmentalist — namely, Scott Greacen, Executive Director of the Environmental Protection Information Center. Like King, Greacen feels passionately about bicycle access through the grove, which is, after all, a state park. “Caltrans has said that this is about access, not safety,” Greacen said on Jan. 2. “But the [Highway Code] policy specifies that bicyclists and pedestrians must be taken care of at the same time. It’s appalling that some of the places that are a real draw — the old-growth groves — have virtually no bike access. The policy exists because whenever they’re split [drivers’ and bicyclists’ concerns], the bike stuff never gets done.”
Does this mean that Greacen is in favor of a substantially larger project? Not exactly. “We would prefer a solution that wouldn’t change the roadway, like signalizing the grove, and — I know this won’t be a popular idea in some quarters — making it one-way through the narrowest portions, so the trucks do have the space. It would cost a lot less than $6 million.” In that vein, Greacen asked, “Why, with the budget being what it is, does this rise to the level of ‘must be done immediately’?”
On another note, Greacen touched upon “the pervasive lack of trust” in Caltrans that has long permeated the environmental community. “The overall take is, there’s a tremendous amount of skepticism over the rush to develop the place, and the need for it. Certain cattle trucks can travel through it at this point, but we’re hearing they might not be able to at some point in the future. Why they should be exempt, when small manufacturing trucks are not, is very confusing to me.”
While the naysayers may feel stymied in their attempts to get clear answers from Caltrans, their efforts certainly haven’t been undertaken in vain: In early May 2008, the agency agreed to a full EIR “after getting input from all over the state,” Caltrans spokeswoman Julie East said. A DEIR was released in early December 2008, and about 50 people braved snow and rain to attend the Dec. 15 meeting. On Dec. 19, East said the agency had not kept a running tally of the number of comments received to date, but a full accounting will be made before the final EIR is released. She added that, in response to continued concerns about the number of trees that would be removed, the agency has “refined and reduced the [proposed] tree take,” especially in the area where the retaining wall would be built.
How many trees? East couldn’t say, but a map on page 82 of the DEIR indicates that a maximum of 89 trees would be removed, 41 of which would be where construction of the retaining wall is proposed. On page 80, Caltrans states: “The majority of the tree removal occurs outside the park (67 percent). Over half the trees to be removed are tan oaks, with the majority ranging from four to ten inches in diameter. About 30 percent of the trees to be removed consist of Douglas fir trees ranging from 4 inches to 24 inches in diameter. Seven redwood trees would be removed, ranging from 4 inches to 16 inches in diameter. The two redwood trees to be removed from the park are 6 inches and 7 inches in diameter. Understory vegetation including smaller ‘seedlings’ would also be removed.”
Want your own copy of this exciting, 181-page read? Go to the Caltrans website, www.dot.ca.gov/dist1/d1projects/richardson_grove/reports.htm. If you’re a troglodyte, you can pick up a hard copy, available at both branches of the Humboldt County Library. Additionally, the DEIR may be reviewed or purchased at the Caltrans District 1 office, 1656 Union St. in Eureka. To cover the cost of printing, $10 will be charged for each copy purchased.
A May 2009 “target date for [project] clearance and approval” has been set. If approved, Caltrans will seek a contractor in late 2009. Written comments will be accepted through January 30; they should be addressed to Kim Floyd, Project Manager, P.O. Box 3700, Eureka, Calif., 95502. Floyd can also be contacted directly at 441-5739, or via e-mail at Kim_Floyd@dot.ca.gov.
Proposed lines ‘set rich blood a-tingling’ in early 1900s
Exposing this east-west rail nonsense
Will chides Andrew for lack of attention to detail and makes plans for his inevitable victory.
The beauty police keep a sharp eye on Caltrans as it studies ways to make Broadway safer
For super work, say the county's five supervisors
STAFF PICK / events, art, outdoors, sports, for kids, free / 9 a.m.-6 p.m. A 3-day, 42-mile kinetic sculpture race over land, sand, mud and water! LeMans start at the Noon Whistle on the Arcata Plaza. Follow the race through Manila, Eureka and into Ferndale on Memorial Day for the Glorious Finish. kineticgrandchampionship.com. 889-3024.
STAFF PICK / events / 8 p.m. Arcata Theatre Lounge, 1036 G St. Student designed and produced clothing. Fundraiser for Arcata Arts Institute. $35/$25 students. artsinstitute.net. 822-1220.
events / 8 a.m.-noon. Woodside Preschool, 900 Hodgson St, Eureka. www.woodsidepreschool.com. 445-9132.
STAFF PICK / outdoors / 9:30 a.m.-12:30 p.m. Meet at Pacific Union School. Help remove non-native invasives at the Lanphere Dunes Unit of the Humboldt Bay National Wildlife Refuge. Tools and gloves provided, wear work clothes and bring water. Carpool to the protected site. 444-1397.
More →
12 Comments
Comment / By Jeff Muskrat / Jan. 9, 2009, 9:57 a.m.
Together, WE WILL STOP THIS PROJECT!
Please contact: humboldtforestdefense@gmail.com to get involved.
Comment / By Jay Darin / Jan. 9, 2009, 9:31 p.m.
I love these trees and in my opinion if Caltrans can perform this constuction with minumum impact to the trees it will protect the tree from future harm. You can see were they have been hit. If there’s a large truck accident and the truck is carring a load of fuel what is that going to do to the roots of the trees. The question about the bicycle riding on the highway, if you can see around the tree sooner than you can see the bicycle sooner.
Comment / By Even Steven / Jan. 11, 2009, 9:48 a.m.
I also love these beautiful, historic trees. We need to preserve as many of them as possible while improving the roadway. The businesses in the area need to give Cal-Trans their estimated cost of doing business for the amount of time of construction. Cal-Trans needs to include that amount into it’s budget so that closing those businesses during construction is part of the plan. Nothing should be done if all parties aren’t included in the revision. Bikes as well, this is a riders paradise and we need to get with the program. This roadway revision has to be an improvement, or not at all. If other cities can do it, we can do it better.
Comment / By Ernie’s Place / Jan. 11, 2009, 10:09 a.m.
Well, it is beginning to look like my Flying Pig plan is the most viable to keep the north coast freight business alive. My stockholders and I are setting pretty to cash in big time!
Kill the Richardson’s Grove Project! Stop the north Coast from becoming part of the real world!
Comment / By Barbara / Jan. 14, 2009, 5:32 p.m.
On the surface this looks like a reasonable project. However, when reviewed in detail there is much to be concerned about. First, while no old growth trees will be cut, their roots will be cut and paved over in places - their environment, including the hydrolic environment will be disturbed and no serious study of these effects has been undertaken. Secondly, the issue of the cumulative effects of the highway widening up and down 101 has not been studied as a whole. Thirdly (but not exclusive of other concerns) why should the interests of local businesses trump the interests of the citizens of the State - this is THEIR Park and these are their tax dollar? Do not be lulled by this CALTRANS sales job!.
Comment / By Jeff Muskrat / Jan. 15, 2009, 2:25 p.m.
“Kill the Richardson’s Grove Project! Stop the north Coast from becoming part of the real world!” Ernie Branscum
I finally agree with you, Ernie. You really should go back to the real world. A lot of us would prefer to keep the “humble” in Humboldt.
Comment / By hah / Jan. 15, 2009, 11:50 p.m.
Bahh. fix the richardsons grove so i can go south quicker and we can get cheaper products up here and give buisnesses in humboldt a break on shipping! We loose local buisnesses because we are not competative! Humboldt brews used to be made here untill they got so big they needed to relocated to redding so they could ship products out easyer. This project will barely affect what the area looks like. Its also a very dangerous area to drive. Its too bad people are such yuppies that the entire community can rally behind saving a few trees but the larger problems in our communitys, Meth, Crime, Poverty. dont get any time! its all save the trees! forget about humans they are the problem! welcome to Neo Liberalism!
Comment / By X Trucker in Piercy / Feb. 12, 2009, 4:32 p.m.
The Feds raised the gas tax $.05 per gallon in 1982 for STAA projects like this. That was 28 frickin years ago. The “Big Box” carriers will bring welcome logistical competition for all with this safer road project. Note: The Caltrans public comment period has been extended till March 12th, 2009.
Comment / By CARRIE E. CONINE / March 12, 2009, 3:24 p.m.
P.S.Can you please, add our names to those of us who are strictly against any and all construction by Cal Trans or any other, in widenning the road at Richiardson Grove, in Southern Humboldt County.
We are, on record, verbalising our disdain for this project. Ms. Carrie E. Conine Garberville (a voteing homeowner) Mr. Daniel J. McDonald Shelter Cove Please forward this message to any and allorganizations that would believe otherwise-so that our voice is heard
Comment / By Humboldt resident / March 17, 2009, 4:01 p.m.
Kindly spare us the predictable hysterics. We’re talking about a minor road project that will save lives, lower freight costs and shorten our drive. It’s a great deal for everyone.
Comment / By Cal-Trans workers dynamited a / April 17, 2009, 5:55 p.m.
the same will happen to R-Grove
Comment / By Jeff Muskrat / May 7, 2009, 12:37 p.m.
Learn more about this project at http://saverichardsongrove.org/
Please visit http://saverichardsongrove.blogspot.com/