the town dandy / By Hank Sims

Job Shop

(Sept. 6, 2007)  Hey, remember “term limits”? That was the quaint little theory proposed and approved by California voters back in 1990. The idea was that the business of government would be wrested from sharpies and placed in the hands of a new breed of “citizen-legislator.” These wholesome, Jimmy Stewart-esque superhumans would rise from the tilled soil to reclaim Sacramento on behalf of good, honest, hard-working people. And after six or eight years of service, just as his replacement became ready for harvest, the “citizen-legislator” would gracefully dissolve into thin air.

That was the theory, anyway. Things turned out a bit differently in practice. Last year, Tamara Keith of National Public Radio documented six separate cases in which a termed-out legislator sought to hand over his or her chair in the legislature to an immediate family member. And that was just in one election.

As anthropologists have long noted, here on the North Coast the Democratic Party apparatus serves as a ready substitute for flesh-and-blood kinship ties. The guillotine falls on Eureka’s Assemblymember Patty Berg next year, but arrangements have already been made to pass her crown to former State Senator Wes Chesbro, who was termie-termed out of his seat in 2006. And Chesbro’s seat, you’ll recall, was given to Santa Rosa’s Pat Wiggins, who was herself termie-termed from the Assembly in 2004.

You’ll notice there’s a wallflower at this waltz — Wiggins has the Senate seat locked up until 2014, denying Berg her patrimony. What’s she to do? Well, it looks like homegirl is going for the big brass ring. That’s right: She’s going statewide. California Insurance Commissioner John Garamendi terms out in 2010, and the hard-smoking Berg believes she has her opening. To that end, she’s put together a little somethin’-somethin’ called “Patty Berg for Insurance Commissioner,” coming soon to a fundraiser near you.

The election may be three years away, but you’ve gotta start early if you want to muscle aside potential competitors. They may not be from the North Coast, and would therefore have limited understanding of the way public offices are traditionally inherited. Berg’s war chest is looking pretty good right now, all things considered. In the first half of 2007, she’s collected over $42,000, most of it in $500-$1,000 chunks from various medical groups and associations. (No dollars from any insurance companies yet.) Once she becomes the presumptive nominee, that small trickle of cash will come to dwarf the mighty Eel.

But Berg is out in 2008, unless a term-limit-busting measure making the rounds actually qualifies for the February ballot and passes. What’s Berg going to do between 2008 and 2010? Here’s a suggestion: How about the California Integrated Waste Management Board, a meat locker used by the powers-that-be in Sacramento to store politicos in transition. A seat on the board pays about $120,000 a year. Chesbro’s not going to need his much longer.

Closer to the horizon: The campaigns that are seeking to shift or maintain the balance of power on the Humboldt Bay Harbor, Recreation and Conservation District have all come sputtering to life, only two months before the Nov. 6 election date. The issue is port development, and the idea that Humboldt Bay could be rebuilt as a container shipping facility and a waypoint on U.S. trade with Asia. The project faces massive, monstrously expensive hurdles, but the pro-port people (in this race, the two incumbents) have every faith those hurdles can be overcome. The anti-port faction — or the “pro-reality” faction, as some of them like to say — think that there’s better things to do with our money and time.

Second District (Fortuna to SoHum) challenger Carlos Quilez was first out of the gate, with a press conference on the Eureka Boardwalk last Wednesday. Quilez pumped his credentials — sport fisherman, Army veteran, retired California State University administrator. He played up his endorsements — Humboldt-Del Norte Central Labor Council, Operating Engineers Local No. 3. He spoke of his vision — “good stewardship for our resources and fiscal responsibility.”

1 2 NEXT PAGE >SHARE