
today
8:30 a.m. Audubon Society Field Trip See Event Description
read >9 a.m. Arcata Farmers' Market Arcata Plaza
read >9:30 a.m. Discovery Walk: Unknown Waterfront See Event Description
read >9:30 a.m. Manila Dunes Restoration Manila Community Center
read >10 a.m. Manila Dunes Guided Walk Manila Community Center
read >10 a.m. Library Book Sale Humboldt County Library
read >10 a.m. Dia de los Muertos and Mexican Folk Art Sale Private Eureka home
read >10 a.m. Final Arcata Farmer's Market Arcata Farmers' Market (off the plaza)
read >11 a.m. Donlin Foreman Dance Workshop Dell'Arte
read >2 p.m. Humboldt Coastal Nature Center Draft Trails Plan Walk Stamps House
read >5 p.m. Bati Zado and Show Redwood Raks World Dance Studio
read >6 p.m. The Tumbleweeds Chapala Cafe
read >6 p.m. Ali Chaudhary (jazz duo) Libation
read >6:30 p.m. Not Evil, Just Wrong Humboldt Area Foundation
read >7 p.m. Guitar Stan (country) Old Town Coffee & Chocolates
read >8 p.m. Guitar Orchestra of Barcelona Arkley Center for the Performing Arts
read >8 p.m. Stones in His Pockets Arcata Playhouse
read >8 p.m. A Christmas Carol North Coast Repertory Theater
read >8 p.m. Donna Landry Swing Dance Moose Lodge
read >8 p.m. North Coast Wind Ensemble Fulkerson Recital Hall at HSU
read >8:30 p.m. The Last Minute Men (international) Cafe Mokka
read >9 p.m. Ian McFeron Band (folk rock) Six Rivers Brewery
read >9 p.m. The Michael Paul Band WAVE @ blue lake casino
read >9 p.m. The Generatorz (classic rock) Central Station Cocktail Lounge
read >9 p.m. Taxi Bear River Casino
read >9 p.m. VJ Itchie Fingaz Pearl Lounge
read >9 p.m. Jack Ruby Presents + Blue Street + Acufunkture (DIY rock) Jambalaya
read >9 p.m. 2nd Annual Scorpio Bash The Red Fox Tavern
read >10 p.m. Music by DJ Sidelines
read >10 p.m. DJ Icy Hot Aunty Mo's Lounge
read >10 p.m. Jemimah Puddleduck (rock) Humboldt Brews
read >10 p.m. White Manna + Midday Veil + The King Salmon Duo (rock) Jambalaya
read >11 p.m. Radio Moscow (psychadelic blues) + Mosquito Bandito (one-man surf/garage) The Alibi Lounge and Restaurant
read >previous columns
June 25, 2009
No Dry Eyes
Feel-good story of the week: 51-year-old Eureka resident Brian Connors, ...
read >June 18, 2009
Rob Me Two Times
By Hank Sims
read >That's a Wrap
By Hank Sims
By Hank Sims
We have received notice that some local videographers are massing to storm the Humboldt County Board of Supervisors next week in response to the "Rebranding Humboldt" YouTube campaign we wrote about a couple of weeks ago ("Rebranding Humboldt," June 25). The videographers, we understand, are more than a little incensed that out-of-county talent was hired to shoot the series of spots, which seek to promote a more "positive" image of Humboldt County than the one that actually exists -- that of a place where the streets are paved with cannabis indica.
Lest we be accused of inciting this mob with false facts, we would like to let the videographers know that we have discovered that certain aspects of that story, while not wrong, could be a bit misleading. We reported that the "Rebranding Humboldt" project has a budget of some $96,000 -- $44,000 of which came from the county's ever-controversial Headwaters Fund for economic development, another $40,000 of which came from a federal grant. These are the figures we got from the Humboldt County Economic Development Department, and they are still correct, so far as we know.
But it seems that there is more to "Rebranding Humboldt" than the YouTubes -- there's gonna be logos and packaging studies and a bunch of other cr... uh, stuff. According to Humboldt County Film Commissioner Mary Cruse, who led the film side of things after her agency won a bid to produce the spots, the Headwaters Fund only chipped in $10,000 to the YouTube project, with local businesses also kicking down a still unknown amount.
It's maybe natural that Economic Development gave us the sum total of their project, which may have led to the misleading perception that these quasi-government types were dropping $100 large on some YouTube videos. I had assumed that was the case, after reading Ryan Burns' story; only when I went back and read it did I realize that Burns had phrased things slightly more cautiously. Now Cruse is feeling besieged by the insurgent videographers, so we want to make the above facts crystal-clear, whether or not those facts can or should make any difference in the argument. So we do apologize for any confusion caused.
But it's all a bit galling, because Cruse pointedly refused to discuss her own portion of the budget when Burns asked her to do so before the fact. The numbers we had from Economic Development were the only accounting of taxpayer dollars spent on this project available. On Tuesday, I asked her why she declined to disclose to our reporter the amount of public funding she had received for this project.
"It just didn't seem like the right time," Cruse said. "I wanted to wait until we had all the facts in. I didn't want to give just part of the story -- I wanted to give the whole story. The people who have worked on it have worked so hard, and it's been a remarkable collaboration. It's been beautiful. And now people are trying to make it into something ugly."
There's maybe one other bit that needs clearing up, here. The Humboldt County Film Commission is supported almost entirely by taxpayers' dollars. Cruse herself has an official title: She is the Interim Humboldt County Film Commissioner. And yet the film commission itself is technically a nonprofit organization, not a governmental entity. So despite the quasi-official status of her agency, she may technically have the legal right to pick and choose when to disclose how, where and why she is spending public money.
Also, it appears she doesn't comply with the strict bidding procedure of a public agency. In this case, Cruse said, she did hire many local citizens to work on the "Rebranding Project," but the director of photography for the project does live in Los Angeles. (Though she called him a "part-time" Humboldt County resident.)
Cruse said she had a whole plan about how to roll the story out. It apparently did not involve pesky people wondering why they didn't get the job, or newspapers asking about the particulars of how much public money was spent. And the way she described it, it really did sound like something else -- almost the subject of a film itself. She talked about an opening night event at the Arcata Theater. There was to have been a Facebook page, where information would be slowly and tantalizingly leaked out in advance of the big night. There would have been an outpouring of thank-yous to everyone who made this project come true. There would have henceforth been a permanent change in the way Humboldt County looks at itself, and the way the world looks at it.
Well, all that is kinda ruined now. Does that make you happy, you awful people? Go smoke your reefers and giggle away. When these spots hit YouTube, boy -- then we'll see who gets the last laugh.


















1. Annamoose:
July 9, 10:02 p.m.
I must say I'm fairly new to the area and enjoy the insightful comments of Hank Sims and the NCJ. I did want to comment on the Film Commission. I've had the opportunity to meet a few and with all due respect they seem to be a bunch of bitter old lesbians and a couple gay guys (oh wait...maybe that was the high school drama club). They originally were part of the Convention and Visitors Bureau but thought Tony Smithers was a dildo and have now gone on to obtain their own financing (Federal, Headwaters, County and Municipal...all tax dollars in one way or another - quite resourceful). I would point out that most of them likely started there "film careers" in a dark room. Like any good pyramid scheme they prosper from the funds obtained to keep themselves employed at the expense, and or, exclusion of the new, innovative and talented film makers in this area.
2. Carol:
July 10, 10:52 a.m.
This sort of issue would never have come up with the former Film Commissioner, unfortunately thrown out of the position.
What a difference good ethics and a genuine desire to improve the community would make about now, as opposed to what seems like the very self-serving agenda of the current regime. It was -- and is-- pretty obvious to lots of - though sadly not enough- people that the 'friends of' organization was -- and is -- ethically flawed.
post a comment