Re: “No Settlement”

King of Misinformation! Greg King is still misrepresenting the terms of the Klamath Settlement and the science upon which it is based even after being canned by the NEC. No one supports flows in the Klamath River of 414 cfs! In the KBRA, flows to irrigators do not trump the ESA - in dry years we will have a drought plan based on the best available science establishing minimal flows for fish. The difference is that today - the minimums is all we ever see. In the future, the minimums will be exceeded in most years and relied upon only in the dry years. King et al seem to think the current management strategy works for fish when nothing could be farther from the truth.