Your draft confuses me jason.
1-You seem to push the value of YOUR free speech above the value of Hoovers free speech. Can free speech hurt? should some kind of vengeance be expected when free speech impacts someone or should it be "free".
2-Is the Eye coverage promoting or demonizing sensationalism? or both? "demonizing sensationalism started this mess...", howwhat? Can you provide a reference as to how demonizing sensationalism started, well, something, and maybe explain what this mess is, because that isn't really clear at all.
3-I don't think you can say that Hoover refuses to debate you publicly, maybe you should say instead that Hoover refuses to debate you AGAIN, right? Why would he anyway when you behave so uncivilly towards him. Another thread has you typing, "Perhaps Hoover would have the nerve to debate this matter and Hank can moderate. That is if Hoover isn't too scared to step outside cheap shots on the internet, his own paper or his buddy Matthews radio show." Any logically fallacies there? You had your shot and you came off unprepared.
4-I think that you use big words in a bad and confusing way, K.I.S.S. right. Who taught you to write anyway?
In Print This Week:
Dec 5, 2013
vol XXIV issue 49
The North Coast Journal Weekly
Website powered by Foundation