'QUARK1 
Member since Apr 8, 2012


Stats

Friends

  • No friends yet.
Become My Friend Find friends »

Recent Comments

Re: “Political Polling Shenanigans

Mitch says: (on the anonymous blog he is now apparantly cohosting)

April 27, 2012 at 9:38 am

"It’s kind of funny-sad to watch all the people who are outraged by non-events launch into ridicule mode when the real dirty tricksters show up."

PRICELESS!!! So do you make yourself laugh and cry at the same time?

Your obsession of how the eye, the mack press , the ncj and the t-s treated the Sundburg dui paints you in the very light you so abhor.

If memory serves, Jack Durham, Kevin Hoover, and I believe Hank Sims all explained what happened with the dui coverage, and how it was covered the way it was.Time and time again...over and over again, it was explained.

As you were listed as the most prolific commenter over at Heraldanonymous for the past year (prolific enough to apparently become part of the flying heraldo staff), it is apparant that you have lost all sight of any kind of impartiality - and you are the guy who wants to monitor our local elections?

Very.Fucking.Scary.

Posted by wowza on 04/27/2012 at 9:34 PM

Re: “Don’t Anoint Susan

Typical of you Scatman Salzman, to dodge and deflect from the issue at hand and focus on an apt description of your character...

Posted by 'QUARK on 04/08/2012 at 6:46 PM

Re: “Don’t Anoint Susan

Only Dick would defend himself so vociferously, alas for your self, you've outed yourself, Richard, thus you posted that shit last election cycle. Go wipe yourself.

Posted by quark on 04/07/2012 at 1:59 PM

Re: “Don’t Anoint Susan

"“Quack” also protests too much about outing alcoholics" Not so fast you shitstain Salzman... First you allege (falsley) that the candidate was involved in an alcohol related traffic accident that involved major injuries...when bullshit is rightly called, you resort to just labeling her an alcoholic. Alas=Salzman, and Salzman, you are a reprehensible piece of shit.

Posted by quark on 04/07/2012 at 10:42 AM

Re: “Don’t Anoint Susan

"Despite a long, tiring string of conjecture " Which is exactly what salzman did in the last da race against jackson and you brought up, you piece of shit.

Posted by Quark on 04/05/2012 at 2:27 PM

Re: “Don’t Anoint Susan

The proof in the pudding that Alas is Salzman is from one of his recent posts: " I feel I know far more about Durham’s character than I do of Salzman’s, who, btw, was apparently correct about outing an alcoholic candidate." Wow...just wow, still going after the lie, an especially egregious one, given that she lost family member to a drunk driver. You are shit, Richard Alas Salzman.

Posted by Quark on 04/04/2012 at 9:34 PM

Re: “Don’t Anoint Susan

Alas, aka Richard Salzman, Aka R.Trent, the ends most certainly do NOT justifiy the means. That line of thinking will have alas....errrrr Richard justifying rounding up all those evil developer/conservative types and throwing em into camps where they can best be controlled. It's complete bullshit that the developers have controlled politics for all these year - if that were true, how does it explain two decades of Bonnie Neely? Larry Glass? Linda Atkins? Melinda Ciarabellini and Lance Madsen are certainly not in league with any developers, though if memory serves, she was appointed to her council seat.

Posted by Quark on 04/04/2012 at 9:31 PM

All Comments »

Favorite Places

  • None.
Find places »

Saved Events

  • Nada.
Find events »

Saved Stories

  • Nope.
Find stories »

Custom Lists

  • Zip.
 

© 2015 The North Coast Journal Weekly

Website powered by Foundation

humboldt