|
COVER STORY | IN THE NEWS | STAGE MATTERS | BOOKNOTES | ARTBEAT November 22, 2007
Do Forests Protect Our Oxygen?by Don Garlick Our comfortable levels of atmospheric oxygen (O2) and carbon dioxide (CO2 ) are attributable to photosynthesis: H2O + CO2 = CH2O + O2. It is thus reasonable to assume that forests are needed to preserve the oxygen we breathe. But that is a common misconception. A mature redwood or Amazon forest busily recycles its products, yielding no net oxygen. Only if the wood is protected from rotting, as in a swamp, will net oxygen be released instead of recombining with dead wood.
Combustion of all the world’s forests would consume a negligible fraction of the atmosphere’s oxygen. On the other hand, the facts presented above imply that we would consume all our free oxygen by burning less than 10 percent of the organic material preserved in sediments. Luckily, the proportion of that organic sediment that is feasibly extractable as fossil fuel (mostly coal) is so small that the oxygen content of the atmosphere would remain above 20 percent (currently 20.9 percent). The dire consequences of converting fuel into carbon dioxide is another story (next week). We must conserve our forests for many reasons, including their carbon content. But one of the few resources we need not worry about is oxygen, thanks to black shale.
The geologically-correct photosynthetic reaction is: 218H20 + 4CO2 + 48CaCO3 + 70FeCO3 + 24FeS2 + 14FeSiO3 = 122CH2O + 48CaSO4 + 2H2O + 54Fe2O3 + 14SiO2 + 11O2
Don Garlick is a geology professor retired from HSU. He invites any questions relating to North Coast science, and if he cannot answer it he will find an expert who can. E-mail dorsgarlick@yahoo.com.
COVER STORY | IN THE NEWS | STAGE MATTERS | BOOKNOTES | ARTBEAT Comments? Write a letter! © Copyright 2007, North Coast Journal, Inc. |