Feb. 12, 2004
IN
THE NEWS | ARTBEAT | THE HUM | PREVIEW | CALENDAR
Tamah Sutfin-Nelson, photo by
Helen Sanderson.
by HELEN
SANDERSON
IT WAS THANKSGIVING MORNING
2002, BRIGHT AND SUNNY, and Tamah Sutfin-Nelson had brought her
dogs down to the river bar underneath Fernbridge. As she watched
them chase each other in circles, a man's voice boomed from a
truck passing by on the bridge overhead: "Look, everyone,
it's a beached whale!"
Moments like that were not uncommon,
nor original, but they still had the ability to darken a beautiful
day.
Weight has always been an issue
for Sutfin-Nelson, a 36-year-old Fortuna resident who works as
an in-home caregiver and part-time security guard. Her mother
put her on skim milk when she was just 3 months old. She remembers
having her meals monitored as early as second grade.
At age 12 she went to "the
fat doctor," a family practitioner in Eureka who ran tests
on the adolescent girl to make sure that her heart was strong
enough to handle weight loss pills.
"It
was basically like prescription speed. I would take that in the
day, and then I would take something that helped me sleep at
night," Sutfin-Nelson said.
She entered her freshman year
of high school at 160 pounds. At 5 feet 7 inches, she was hardly
petite, but she wasn't obese either. She just thought of herself
that way.
"I was the fat cheerleader,"
she said. "When I look back at pictures of myself then,
I look so small, but at that time I felt like I was 400 pounds."
By her sophomore year her weight
had climbed to 220. Forcing herself to vomit after eating wasn't
helping keep the pounds off, so she started taking methamphetamines,
real speed. She continued to use the drug until she was 23, when
she became pregnant.
"When I found out [about
the pregnancy], quitting speed was not even a question. It wasn't
hard at all and I never went back. But food, that's something
you can't quit forever, no matter how bad you want to lose weight."
That was the question Sutfin-Nelson
confronted a year ago: How badly did she want to lose weight?
Years of dieting had proved fruitless. She was now close to 400
pounds, and her doctors were telling her that if she didn't lose
weight, the knee problems she'd been experiencing would become
worse -- to the point where she would end up in a wheelchair.
There was a way out, possibly
-- gastric bypass surgery, an inherently risky operation that
shrinks a person's stomach and bypasses most of the small intestine
where calories are absorbed. It was a last resort, but Sutfin-Nelson
didn't see what choice she had. She'd done some research and
felt fairly confident. But she was hesitant to tell her family
and friends. No wonder. Her older brother, Jim, had had the operation
three years before. He died from complications.
[PHOTO ABOVE LEFT:
Tamah Sutfin-Nelson two months before surgery in March 2003.]
Risky
business
The probability of a patient
dying from the procedure, in which the stomach is reduced to
the size of an egg, is estimated at one in 100. The staples used
to secure the reduced stomach can come loose, blood clots can
develop and infections can set in. In Jim Sutfin's case, it was
an infection of the pancreas. [See story
below]
Gastric bypass surgeons and
patients point out that death is a possibility in all surgeries
-- like a liver transplant or heart surgery. The difference is
that a gastric bypass procedure is a choice -- an elective surgery
that is not performed in an emergency situation. Critics say
that both doctors and patients are opting too readily for the
surgery, putting the patient unnecessarily at risk and ignoring
the emotional problems that come with being chronically obese.
Only
a few years ago gastric bypass surgery was considered a radical
operation, limited mainly to overweight celebrities like singer
Carnie Wilson (daughter of the Beach Boys' Brian Wilson) and
comedian Roseanne Barr -- waning stars desperate for Hollywood's
validation. But with obesity reaching epidemic proportions
-- 39 million adult Americans are obese or overweight, according
to the National Institutes of Health -- the procedure's popularity
has spread from big cities to breadbasket communities across
the nation. The number of surgeries has quadrupled in the past
five years. Last year alone, more than 100,000 Americans underwent
the $25,000 operation, and waiting lists are growing.
Since the surgery is not performed
in hospitals on the North Coast -- no doctor here does it --
Humboldt residents are traveling hours away to get it, to places
like San Francisco, Sacramento, Fresno, even as far as the town
of Delano, north of Bakersfield. Fledgling gastric bypass, or
"bariatric," programs are cropping up closer to home,
however. Doctors in Redding; Klamath Falls, Ore.; Coos Bay, Ore.;
and Santa Rosa are beginning to accept overflow patients stuck
on the waiting lists of more experienced doctors.
Support groups for people who
have either undergone gastric bypass surgery or are contemplating
doing so have been in existence for about two years at St. Joseph
Hospital in Eureka. Another one got started recently in Fortuna.
At a meeting late last month, 10 people expressed interest in
having the surgery; another 19 had already gone through it. Nadine
Hartman, the 46-year-old Fortuna resident and daycare provider
who started the group, is in the latter category. Since having
the surgery in Fresno last August, her weight has dropped from
the 280 range to around 200.
[ABOVE RIGHT: Tamah
Sutfin-Nelson's abdomenimmediately following her gastric bypass
surgery in May.]
For
many, diets don't work
Dr. Edward Asa Stockton, an
orthopedic surgeon in Eureka, has had an even more dramatic result
in his own surgery: He lost 160 pounds, dropping from 420 before
the surgery to 260 today. The surgery was done three years ago,
proof that its benefits last. It would never have happened, Stockton
said, through dieting alone.
Other overweight people are
coming to the same conclusion -- diets don't work, at least not
for the long term. What typically happens is that people initially
shed weight only to eventually regain it, and then some. They
then go on another diet, and the same thing happens.
The reason lies in the body's
metabolism. When a person who once consumed an above-average
amount of calories, say 2,600 a day, begins to consume a below-average
amount, say 1,400 calories, they slim down. But in time the body
reacts to the new eating pattern by slowing down its metabolism.
If at some point the dieter begins to eat more than that below-average
quantity -- even if it is less than their previous caloric intake,
2,000 calories for example -- their body stores the extra calories
in response to their slowed metabolism.
In other words, their body misreads
the reduced nutrition as a threat and goes into a self-preservation
mode, essentially becoming more successful at holding onto extra
fat.
Some people see gastric bypass
surgery as an easy way out for an obese population unwilling
to work hard enough to stay thin. Patients disagree.
"To say that obesity is
a question of willpower is insulting and simplistic," said
Susie Spitzer, an RN with Mad River Hospital who underwent
the surgery. "We have not failed dieting, dieting has failed
us."
Sutfin-Nelson echoed Spitzer's
assertion. "I think that fat people have more will power
than almost anyone. There isn't an overweight person I know who
hasn't starved themselves to try to lose weight."
Spitzer, 55, went on to cite
studies that show that only 6 percent of those who have attempted
diets succeed -- meaning they keep the weight off for three years
or more.
"Atkins, the Zone, South
Beach, fen-phen: You name it I've done it all," she said.
"When you get down to brass tacks, the yo-yo effect of dieting
is bad for your body, and it's bad for your self-esteem."
To even become a candidate for
gastric bypass surgery, the applicant must demonstrate that she
has tried dieting and that it has failed -- meaning that substantial
and long-term weight loss never occurred.
Some critics suspect that dieting
programs like Weight Watchers and Jenny Craig are
set up this way intentionally: the system reaps huge profits
by ensuring that diets are unsuccessful. According to estimates,
the dieting industry in America alone rakes in $40 billion
dollars annually while obesity rates continue to climb.
Types
of surgery
Although the recent popularity
of gastric bypass surgery makes it seem like a new operation,
a form of the stomach-shrinking surgery has been around since
the 1950s.
One of the earliest procedures,
known as the jejuno-illeal bypass (JIB), connected the upper
part of the small intestine to the lower part. With food essentially
bypassing a long middle section of the small intestine where
most calories are absorbed, patients could still eat large quantities
without absorbing calories or nutrients -- a phenomenon called
malabsorption. Patients lost weight from the procedure, but over
the long term the lack of nourishment led to life-threatening
health effects, including kidney and liver failure. The procedure
fell out of favor by the 1970s.
"Twenty to 30 years ago
it was basically considered a charlatan operation," Stockton
said. "It didn't really catch on again until five or six
years ago."
Stomach stapling, called gastroplasty,
was introduced in the 1980s. But a problem soon became apparent:
The stomach walls would stretch despite the staples and calories
were still being absorbed in the intestine. Just as with dieting,
people would lose weight only to put it back on.
The solution doctors eventually
hit on was to combine the nutrient deprivation technique of the
1950s with the size restriction method of the 1980s.
Under the most commonly performed
gastric bypass procedure today, known as the roux-en Y, doctors
staple off much of the stomach, leaving just a small pouch that
can only contain a few ounces of food. The pouch is then connected
to the lower part of the small intestine, bypassing about one-third
of the digestive tract where calories are absorbed. The procedure
is typically completed in about 90 minutes and patients are out
of the hospital within three or four days.
A more drastic procedure, called
a duodenal switch, actually removes close to 80 percent of the
stomach. While the remaining pouch is slightly larger than that
in the roux-en Y, allowing the patient to eat more, a greater
portion of the small intestine is bypassed, so the body absorbs
fewer calories.
Both operations require that
patients take vitamins and minerals, particularly pills containing
calcium and iron, to maintain normal levels of nutrients after
the surgery. Duodenal switch patients, because of the higher
rate of malabsorption, tend to lose more weight than those who
have the roux-en Y.
In a third, less invasive gastric
surgery, a plastic band is placed around the stomach, restricting
how much it can contain. With this procedure, patients cannot
overeat but they still absorb calories and nutrients as they
did before. For that reason, the results are not as dramatic
as the other surgeries, but the band is removable and therefore
the surgery is relatively easy to reverse.
Hartman, Spitzer and Stockton
all opted for the roux-en Y procedure. Not only have they lost
weight, but other problems are also beginning to abate. Stockton
no longer suffers from sleep apnea. (The stoppage of breathing
while asleep.) Spitzer takes only a fraction of her high blood
pressure medication and Hartman says that her diabetes is becoming
easier to manage.
`Not
a magic bullet'
Dr. Alan Glaseroff [photo below left]
, who runs a family practice in Arcata with his wife, Dr. Ann
Lindsay, is the chief medical officer for the Humboldt Independent
Practitioners Association (IPA). He does not think gastric bypass
surgery is the answer to the obesity epidemic.
"This
surgery is not a magic bullet," Glaseroff said. "But
it's promoted that way for people who have been looking for a
magic cure for a long time."
"Morbid [extreme]
obesity does not happen overnight," Glaseroff went on.
"It's the result of an eating disorder that surgery can't
fix."
Glaseroff described a patient
of his who was suffering from depression. She had the surgery,
and although she lost more than 100 pounds, she still had emotional
problems. With a postoperative stomach that could only contain
four ounces of food, eating for emotional comfort was
no longer an option. Although she never had issues with alcohol
before, the woman began to drink heavily. She later became suicidal
and has since been seeing a counselor.
"Oftentimes obese people
use food as a barrier. Maybe the person was molested and food
becomes a comfort or a form of protection. They might think,
`If I'm fat, my abuser won't find me attractive, they'll leave
me alone,'" Glaseroff said. "Years later, their weight
becomes an external sign of unhappiness. So the person has surgery,
and as they lose the weight they feel like their shield is gone
and they're terrified."
After seeing cases like these,
while simultaneously being flooded with requests from people
needing a doctor's referral to have the surgery, Glaseroff decided
that an alternative approach was needed to combat obesity problems
locally.
He put a call out to health
professionals in the area requesting help to develop a program
that worked specifically with severely obese people. He said
the response was encouraging. Registered dieticians, doctors,
physical therapists and psychotherapists decided to work together
on the problem.
Each of the 40 patients in the
Morbid Obesity Case Management Program has a nurse assigned to
him or her, are medically evaluated and put on a diet and exercise
plan along with counseling sessions. Glaseroff says that the
people on the program, while still in its beginning stages, are
steadily losing weight, and just as important, are dealing with
the emotional strain of their weight problems.
A
profitable procedure
Since the IPA is a mediator
of sorts for insurance providers, people who carry certain insurances
-- like some Blue Cross plans -- must get the approval of the
IPA before having surgery. And in the past year, the IPA, in
part because of Glaseroff, has made it harder for obese people
to qualify.
Not only that, the IPA only
refers patients to the University of San Francisco Medical Center
and Stanford University. In most cases those hospitals require
that patients lose 10 percent of their excess weight before surgery.
"There's been this pushback
from patients who have surgeons telling them that it's their
right to have the surgery, that they shouldn't have to wait.
Well, that's an economically driven response," Glaseroff
said.
Doctors, of course, are aware
there's money to be made. The Fresno surgeon who operated on
Hartman, the woman who started the Fortuna support group, recently
offered to pay rent for a space for the group if 50 people
interested in having the surgery show up for a meeting. He
has also offered to make the eight-hour drive north to host an
informative seminar about the surgery. Fifty more patients, at
$20,000 to $25,000 per surgery, equates to $1 million or more.
Still, surgeons require that
the patients jump through some hoops before they can have the
surgery. Among the list of requirements are a psychological
evaluation, documentation of a failed diet history, blood work
and an EKG in addition to other lab tests. Also, patients
must be overweight by at least 100 pounds. Those with at least
three obesity-related disorders -- type 2 diabetes, heart
disease, high blood pressure, sleep apnea -- can be somewhat
less overweight.
Even
in light of the growing requests for the operation, the economic
incentive and patients' claims of becoming healthier post-surgery,
Glaseroff is not convinced that the weight loss procedure will
be around for much longer.
"Ten years from now I imagine
that they won't perform it anymore," he said.
The reason? Long-term medical
studies will eventually show that the surgery is detrimental
to a person's health. Glaseroff cited a Swedish study that is
so far the only long-term investigation of the effects of gastric
bypass surgery conducted on a large sample of people -- close
to 8,000. While the study showed a significant post-operative
drop in diabetes among patients, it did not reveal diminished
rates of heart disease, the leading cause of death for diabetics.
So what's the solution? Glaseroff
said hope lies in advances in pharmaceuticals -- particularly
in creating a medicine that controls a hunger-inducing hormone
called ghrelin.
`Comfort
eating'
Since having a duodenal switch
performed, Sutfin-Nelson has lost 143 pounds, but her battle
with weight is not over. On average, patients shed pounds steadily
for close to 18 months before reaching a size that remains fairly
constant. Nine months out of surgery, the rate at which Sutfin-Nelson
is shedding pounds appears to be slowing.
She admitted to some "comfort
eating." No one could blame her. Just two months ago, her
husband Lee, who was not obese, died unexpectedly of heart failure
at age 54. Since then, Sutfin-Nelson hasn't been quite as strict
with her diet as she should be -- opting, for example, to have
a bowl of cereal instead of preparing a small, low-carbohydrate,
high protein meal for herself.
If she hadn't had the surgery
at all, she has no doubt that she would have turned to food for
solace big time.
"I probably would have
gained 40 to 60 pounds by now," she said.
[ABOVE RIGHT: Tamah
Sutfin-Nelson, six months after surgery, nearly 140 pounds lighter.]
A
surgery gone wrong
STANDING
6 FEET 4 INCHES AND WEIGHING 511 POUNDS, 38-year-old Jim Sutfin
decided enough was enough. He'd tried diet after diet since high
school, and not once was he able to permanently shed weight.
It's true, at one point he did lose 180 pounds, but he gained
that and more back even as he continued to diet.
In March 2000, Sutfin left his
home in southern Oregon and drove to the Sacred Heart Medical
Center in Eugene, where Dr. Latham Flanagan was to operate on
him. It was no minor surgery that was scheduled. It was a type
of gastric bypass surgery called a roux-en Y in which a large
part of the stomach is literally stapled shut. Approximately
one in 100 people die from it.
His family was supportive, but
worried that complications could occur. Sutfin played down their
concerns. When his mother said that she would leave her home
in Humboldt County to see him through the surgery, he said it
would be best if she waited a few weeks instead, so that she
would be able to see the results.
When they got the call that
he was in intensive care, his mother and his sister, Fortuna
resident Tamah Sutfin-Nelson, drove immediately to Eugene. By
the time they arrived he had fallen into a coma. Thirty-six hours
after surgery, he died, leaving behind his wife, Mary, and three
children, ages 11, 9 and 7. The cause of death was "acute
pancreatitis," an infection of the pancreas.
In addition to being a tragedy,
it was also a shock, as Sutfin, despite his bulk, led a vigorous
life. He played volleyball three times a week and was an avid
hunter and fisherman. He managed his diabetes with insulin, and
aside from knee problems -- something his sister suffers from
as well -- he was an active person. That's why doctors had told
the family ahead of time not to worry.
For the next two years, his
sister -- who successfully underwent a similar procedure last
year, researched gastric bypass surgery, partly in the hope of
finding an answer to Sutfin's death. But she came up empty-handed.
-- Helen Sanderson
IN
THE NEWS | ARTBEAT | THE HUM | PREVIEW | CALENDAR
Comments?
© Copyright 2004, North Coast Journal,
Inc.
|